Let’s be real. If you’ve ever spent seven hours cramped in a middle seat over the North Atlantic, breathing recycled air and wondering if that "chicken or pasta" choice was a trick question, you’ve probably thought about it. You’ve thought about a tunnel from New York to London.
It sounds like pure sci-fi. Honestly, it kind of is.
People have been obsessed with this idea for over a century. We’re talking about a 3,400-mile stretch of ocean that drops to depths of over 12,000 feet. To put that in perspective, the English Channel Tunnel—the "Chunnel" that connects the UK and France—is only 31 miles long. We are talking about a project over 100 times that length.
It’s not just a big job. It’s arguably the most impossible engineering feat ever conceived.
Why the Transatlantic Tunnel is the "Holy Grail" of Engineering
When engineers talk about a tunnel from New York to London, they aren’t usually talking about digging through the seabed. That would be insane. The pressure at the bottom of the Atlantic would crush just about anything we can build today. Instead, the leading concept is a submerged floating tunnel.
Think of it like a massive straw held in place by cables.
This isn't just a fantasy from a 19th-century Jules Verne novel. In the early 2000s, the Discovery Channel’s Extreme Engineering actually broke down how this might work. They envisioned a vacuum-sealed tube floating roughly 150 to 300 feet below the surface. By removing the air from the tube, you eliminate air resistance. Without air resistance, you can use maglev (magnetic levitation) trains.
How fast? We’re talking 5,000 miles per hour.
At that speed, you could leave Manhattan and arrive in London in under an hour. You’d literally get there faster than it takes to get through security at JFK.
The Vacuum Problem
To reach those speeds, the tube has to be a total vacuum. Keeping a 3,000-mile pipe vacuum-sealed while it’s being tossed around by ocean currents and internal tectonic shifts is... well, it’s a nightmare. If even a tiny leak occurred, the air rushing back in at supersonic speeds would likely vaporize anything in its path.
🔗 Read more: The MOAB Explained: What Most People Get Wrong About the Mother of All Bombs
Then there's the heat.
Maglev trains produce heat. In a vacuum, there’s no air to carry that heat away. You’d basically be riding in a giant toaster oven unless someone figures out a revolutionary cooling system that doesn't rely on traditional convection.
The Trillion-Dollar Price Tag (And Other Realities)
Money is usually where these dreams go to die.
Building a tunnel from New York to London would cost somewhere between $12 trillion and $175 trillion. To give you some context, the entire GDP of the United States is around $27 trillion. You’d basically need the entire world to stop spending money on anything else for several years just to pay for the concrete and steel.
And the steel? You’d need more than the world currently produces.
Frankly, we don't have the materials. Not yet. We’d need tens of thousands of anchors to hold the tube in place, reaching down miles to the ocean floor. The logistics of shipping that much material to the middle of the Atlantic—one of the most volatile environments on Earth—is enough to make any project manager quit on the spot.
Geopolitics and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge
The Earth isn't a static ball. The Atlantic Ocean is actually getting wider.
The Mid-Atlantic Ridge is a tectonic plate boundary where the plates are pulling apart. This creates volcanic activity and earthquakes. If you build a rigid tunnel across a line where the earth is literally splitting open, you’re going to have a bad time.
Engineers would have to build "expansion joints" on a scale never seen before. Imagine a bridge that can stretch and contract by several feet while maintaining a perfect vacuum seal and supporting a train moving at Mach 6.
💡 You might also like: What Was Invented By Benjamin Franklin: The Truth About His Weirdest Gadgets
It’s a lot to ask.
Has Anyone Actually Tried This?
In short: No.
But people have tried smaller versions. The Sognefjord in Norway has been a testing ground for the concept of "Submerged Floating Bridges." Because the fjords are so deep, traditional bridges aren't feasible. Norwegian engineers have spent years researching "Archimedes Bridges"—tubes that stay underwater because of buoyancy.
If they can make it work for a few kilometers, it proves the physics. But moving from a Norwegian fjord to the open Atlantic is like moving from a backyard pool to a Category 5 hurricane.
There's also the "Transatlantic Tunnel" mentioned by Michel Verne (Jules Verne's son) in 1888. Even back then, people realized that the only way to make the trip bearable was to make it fast. He imagined pneumatic tubes shooting carriages across the sea. We’ve moved from air pressure to magnets, but the core desire remains the same: we want to shrink the world.
Why We Might See It (Eventually)
Technology has a funny way of making the impossible look inevitable.
Fifty years ago, the idea of carrying the world’s knowledge in your pocket seemed like sorcery. Today, we’re looking at SpaceX’s Starship and Starlink. Maybe the tunnel from New York to London won't be a tunnel at all.
Elon Musk’s "Hyperloop" concept is essentially the land-based version of this transatlantic dream. If the Hyperloop can be proven over long distances on land—say, from LA to San Francisco—the appetite for an underwater version will skyrocket.
The Environmental Angle
Aviation is a massive carbon emitter. A maglev tunnel powered by renewable energy (like tidal power from the very ocean it sits in) would be the ultimate "green" transport.
📖 Related: When were iPhones invented and why the answer is actually complicated
- Tidal Energy: The North Atlantic has some of the most powerful tides on the planet.
- Speed: Removing the need for short-haul and long-haul flights would reshape global commerce.
- Connection: It would effectively merge the economies of the US and the UK into a single mega-region.
But don't sell your airline stocks just yet.
The safety concerns are staggering. How do you evacuate a train in the middle of the ocean? You can’t just walk out the door. You’re 200 feet underwater and 1,500 miles from the nearest coast. Any accident would be 100% fatal for everyone on board. Developing the fail-safes for that kind of risk takes decades of testing.
Realistic Alternatives We’ll See First
Since a tunnel from New York to London is likely a century away, what's actually happening now?
We are seeing a resurgence in supersonic flight. Companies like Boom Supersonic are working on planes that could do the trip in 3.5 hours. It’s not an hour, but it’s a lot better than what we have. Also, suborbital space flight (point-to-point rockets) could potentially bridge the gap in under 45 minutes.
Rockets are actually more likely than tunnels.
It sounds crazy, but launching a rocket into space and landing it in London is actually cheaper and easier than building a 3,000-mile vacuum tube under the ocean. Gravity and physics are easier to deal with in the vacuum of space than in the crushing weight of the Atlantic.
Final Practical Realities
The concept of the transatlantic tunnel remains a beautiful, terrifying dream. It’s a testament to human ambition that we even talk about it. If you’re following this topic because you want to see it happen, keep your eyes on two specific fields: material science (specifically carbon nanotubes) and the Norwegian fjord projects.
If we can’t build a stable tube in a calm fjord, we have no business trying it in the Atlantic.
Actionable Next Steps:
- Follow the Sognefjord Project: This is the "canary in the coal mine" for floating tunnel technology. If Norway succeeds, the tech becomes "proven."
- Monitor Maglev Progress: Look at the Chuo Shinkansen in Japan. It’s the closest thing we have to the speed and tech required for a transatlantic crossing.
- Research Carbon Nanotubes: Until we have a material that is significantly stronger and lighter than steel, the structural requirements for a 3,000-mile floating tube cannot be met.
- Look into Suborbital Travel: For those wanting New York to London in an hour, watch SpaceX and Blue Origin. Their point-to-point travel plans will likely beat any tunnel by at least 50 years.
The world is getting smaller, but the Atlantic is still a very, very big place.