The Tudors TV Show: Why We Still Can't Get Enough of Henry VIII's Messy Life

The Tudors TV Show: Why We Still Can't Get Enough of Henry VIII's Messy Life

Let’s be real for a second. If you’re watching The Tudors TV show for a perfectly accurate history lesson, you’re doing it wrong. It’s a soap opera with a massive costume budget. It’s loud, it’s sweaty, and it’s basically "Gossip Girl" but with more beheadings and velvet.

Michael Hirst, the creator, didn’t set out to write a textbook. He told The New York Times back when the show premiered that he wanted people to actually care about the history, even if that meant fudging the dates or making everyone look like they just stepped off a runway. It worked. Millions of us spent four seasons watching Jonathan Rhys Meyers transform from a pouting, athletic prince into a bloated, paranoid tyrant.

People still argue about this show. Some historians hate it. Fans love it. But why does it still feel so relevant years after the finale aired?

The Great Hot Henry Debate

The biggest hurdle for anyone who knows their history is Jonathan Rhys Meyers. The real Henry VIII was a big guy. By the time he died, his waist was roughly 54 inches. He had to be hoisted onto his horse with a crane. In The Tudors TV show, Henry stays relatively fit until the very end.

It’s a choice.

Hirst argued that Henry’s "bigness" was about his presence, not just his literal weight. While that sounds like a bit of a reach, it allowed the show to focus on the psychological decay of a man who thought he was a god. You see him go from a guy who just wants to play tennis and hunt to a man who executes his best friends because he’s bored or scared.

The supporting cast actually carries the heavy lifting here. Henry Cavill—long before he was Superman—played Charles Brandon. In the show, Brandon is Henry’s best friend and a total playboy. In real life, Brandon was just as messy. He married the King’s sister, Mary, without permission. The show changes her name to Margaret to avoid confusion with Henry’s daughter, which is a bit annoying for history buffs, but honestly? It makes the family tree a little easier to follow on screen.

The Anne Boleyn Effect

If there is one reason to rewatch The Tudors TV show, it’s Natalie Dormer.

🔗 Read more: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa

Most portrayals of Anne Boleyn make her a one-dimensional villain or a helpless victim. Dormer plays her as a strategist. You see the gears turning. You see the desperation when she realizes she can’t produce a male heir.

  • She’s witty.
  • She’s terrifying.
  • She’s incredibly vulnerable.

The chemistry between her and Rhys Meyers is what fuels the first two seasons. When she finally walks to the scaffold, it hurts. Even though we all know how it ends, the show makes you hope for a different outcome. That’s good television. It’s also where the show gets surprisingly accurate. Anne’s final speech in the show is almost word-for-word what was recorded by observers at the Tower of London in 1536.

Where the Show Gets It Totally Wrong (and Why It Matters)

Okay, let’s talk about the inaccuracies. They are everywhere.

For starters, the Pope looks like he’s about 100 years old and lives in a version of the Vatican that looks suspiciously like a cold Irish castle. In reality, the Papacy was a whirlwind of Italian politics and military alliances. The show simplifies the "Great Matter"—Henry’s divorce from Catherine of Aragon—into a personal grudge match.

Then there’s the timeline. The Tudors TV show moves at the speed of light.

Events that took decades are squashed into a few episodes. Henry’s sister marries the King of Portugal in the show and kills him in his sleep. In real life, she married the King of France, he died of natural causes (likely from "exhaustion" in the bedroom, if you believe the gossip of the time), and she lived a relatively long life afterward.

Does it matter?

💡 You might also like: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch

If you’re writing a thesis, yes. If you’re looking for a gripping drama about power, not really. The show uses these factual shortcuts to get to the emotional core of the story. It’s about the isolation of power. Every character in this show is terrified. One wrong word to the King and you’re in the dungeon.

The Costumes are a Fever Dream

The costume designer, Joan Bergin, won multiple Emmys for her work on the series. But if you look closely, half the outfits aren't even remotely 16th-century. There’s a lot of leather. There’s a lot of exposed chest hair.

Real Tudor clothing was about layers. It was about showing wealth through the sheer amount of fabric you could afford to wrap around your body. The show goes the opposite way. It uses clothes to tell us about the character's internal state. When Henry is happy, he’s in bright golds and whites. When he’s spiraling, he’s in dark, heavy furs.

The Politics of the Reformation

Underneath all the sex and violence, The Tudors TV show actually does a decent job of explaining the Reformation.

It wasn't just about Henry wanting to sleep with Anne Boleyn. It was about money. The Church in England was incredibly wealthy. By breaking away from Rome, Henry could seize all that land and gold.

The show highlights Thomas Cromwell, played by James Frain. Cromwell is often the villain in Tudor stories (look at A Man for All Seasons), but here, he’s a pragmatist. He’s the low-born son of a blacksmith who rises to become the most powerful man in England. His downfall is one of the most brutal sequences in the series. It serves as a grim reminder: in Henry’s court, loyalty meant nothing if the King’s mood shifted.

  1. Cromwell's Rise: He uses the law to give Henry what he wants.
  2. The Dissolution: He shuts down the monasteries, fueling the crown's coffers.
  3. The Fall: One bad marriage recommendation (Anne of Cleves) and he’s done.

Why We Are Still Obsessed With This Era

There is something about the Tudors that feels modern. They were the first real celebrities. Their portraits were the Instagram of the 1500s—heavily edited, designed to project a specific image of power and beauty.

📖 Related: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later

The Tudors TV show leans into this. It treats the court like a high-stakes corporate office. Everyone is trying to climb the ladder, and everyone is willing to kick the person below them to stay there.

The show also doesn't shy away from the sheer weirdness of the time. The medical practices (bloodletting, anyone?), the religious obsession, and the bizarre rituals of the royal bedchamber. It’s a world that is completely foreign yet strangely familiar in its greed and ambition.

The Later Wives: Lost in the Shuffle?

The show struggles a bit in Season 4. Once Anne Boleyn is gone and Jane Seymour passes away, the show has to cycle through three more wives in a very short amount of time.

  • Anne of Cleves: Portrayed by Joss Stone. The show makes her out to be quite charming, which makes Henry’s rejection of her even more baffling.
  • Catherine Howard: Tamzin Merchant plays her as a naive teenager. It’s uncomfortable to watch, which is exactly how it should feel. She was a kid caught in a shark tank.
  • Catherine Parr: Joely Richardson brings a much-needed maturity to the final episodes. She’s the survivor.

The ending of the show is surprisingly quiet. There are no big battles. It’s just an old, sick man haunted by the ghosts of the people he killed. It’s a somber reflection on what a "successful" reign actually costs.

How to Watch and What to Look For

If you’re diving in for the first time, or maybe a rewatch, keep an eye on the background characters. The show is great at showing how the "little people" in the court react to the King's whims.

Pro Tip: Don't Google the history while you're watching. It will ruin the surprises. Watch a season, then go read a biography of Catherine of Aragon or Thomas More. You’ll appreciate the show's drama more when you see the "boring" reality it's based on.

Actionable Takeaways for History Fans

If The Tudors TV show sparked an interest in the real-life monarchy, here is how to bridge the gap between fiction and fact:

  • Read "Wolf Hall" by Hilary Mantel. It’s the gold standard for Tudor historical fiction. It focuses on Thomas Cromwell and provides a much deeper, more grounded look at the politics than the TV show.
  • Visit the Tower of London (virtually or in person). Seeing the actual site of the executions mentioned in the show puts the stakes into perspective.
  • Check out the Primary Sources. Many of Henry VIII’s love letters to Anne Boleyn still exist. They are surprisingly sappy and prove that the "obsessed" version of Henry we see on screen isn't all that exaggerated.
  • Look at the Portraits. Go to the National Portrait Gallery's website and look at the Hans Holbein paintings. Look at the eyes of the people Henry killed. It adds a layer of reality that no TV show can match.

The legacy of The Tudors TV show isn't its accuracy. It's the way it brought these dead figures back to life. It made them human, flawed, and deeply messy. We don't watch it to learn dates; we watch it to see ourselves in the vanity and the drama of the past.

For those looking to continue their journey into the era, start by comparing the show's portrayal of Mary I (Bloody Mary) with her actual reign. The show ends before she takes the throne, but the seeds of her future are sown in her mistreatment during the divorce of her parents. Understanding the trauma she endured as a princess explains a lot about the queen she eventually became. Explore the letters between her and her father to see the real-life tension that the show only begins to scratch.