Elon Musk and Sam Altman used to be on the same team. Back in 2015, they sat around a table with Greg Brockman and Ilya Sutskever, dreaming of a non-profit that would save humanity from a "Terminator" style AI future. Fast forward to now, and the relationship has basically imploded into a series of lawsuits, public insults, and constant speculation that Elon Musk has launched a hostile takeover bid of OpenAI. It's messy. It’s loud. And frankly, it’s one of the most complex corporate dramas we’ve seen in the Silicon Valley era.
But we need to get one thing straight right away: a "hostile takeover" in the traditional sense—like what Elon did with Twitter—is legally almost impossible with OpenAI. Why? Because OpenAI isn't a typical public company. You can't just go out and buy a majority of shares on the open market because there is no open market for them. Yet, the narrative persists. People see the lawsuits and the constant pressure from Musk’s xAI and think he’s trying to seize the wheel of the ship he helped build.
Why the Elon Musk Has Launched a Hostile Takeover Bid of OpenAI Narrative exists
When people talk about a takeover, they’re usually looking at the legal filings. Musk sued OpenAI and Sam Altman, alleging that the company shifted from its original mission of being a "non-profit for the benefit of humanity" to being a closed-source, profit-maximizing subsidiary of Microsoft. He wants the court to force OpenAI to open its code. He wants the money he donated back. Some legal experts argue that if he wins, the resulting restructuring could effectively hand him or a new board control over how the technology is governed.
It’s personal.
Musk feels like he was the primary benefactor who got played. He put in the early cash—roughly $44 million—when nobody else believed in the project. Then, according to his legal team, once the tech actually started working, Altman and company "set the founding agreement on fire." This isn't just about money; it's about the soul of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence).
The Microsoft Complication
Microsoft has poured billions into OpenAI. They own a massive chunk of the for-profit arm's future profits. If Musk were to actually succeed in any kind of "takeover" or forced restructuring, he’d have to fight through the legal armor of one of the largest corporations on earth. It’s a three-way chess match between Musk’s xAI, Altman’s OpenAI, and Satya Nadella’s Microsoft.
Honestly, the term "hostile takeover" is a bit of a misnomer here, but the intent feels the same. Musk is using the court system as a battering ram. He’s trying to break the current governance structure. If the court rules that OpenAI must return to its non-profit roots and stop benefiting Microsoft, the current board would likely collapse. That creates a power vacuum.
And Elon Musk loves a power vacuum.
💡 You might also like: Memphis Doppler Weather Radar: Why Your App is Lying to You During Severe Storms
The xAI Factor: A Takeover by Competition?
Maybe the "bid" isn't happening in a courtroom. Maybe it's happening in the data centers. While the headlines scream about the lawsuit, Musk is busy building xAI and its Grok model. He recently secured a massive $6 billion in Series B funding. He’s building "Colossus," a massive supercomputer in Memphis that uses 100,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs.
By scaling xAI at a breakneck pace, Musk is attempting a market takeover. He’s trying to make OpenAI’s talent leave and join him. He’s trying to make their "closed" model look obsolete compared to his "pro-humanity" approach.
- He’s poaching top researchers.
- He’s leveraging the X (formerly Twitter) data firehose.
- He’s positioning himself as the only "safe" alternative.
This is a war of attrition. If you can’t buy the company, you try to replace it. You out-compute them. You out-fundraise them. You make the public distrust their leadership so much that the "hostile takeover" happens via a mass exodus of users and developers.
Is OpenAI actually "Open" anymore?
This is the core of Musk’s argument. He argues that the name "OpenAI" has become a lie. He’s not entirely wrong. GPT-4’s weights aren't public. The training data is a closely guarded secret. For a company that started with the goal of sharing everything to prevent a monopoly, they’ve become the definition of a walled garden.
This irony is what fuels the "Elon Musk has launched a hostile takeover bid of OpenAI" headlines. He’s framing his legal and competitive moves as a "rescue mission." He says he’s trying to save the original mission. Skeptics, however, say he’s just mad he’s not the one in charge of the world’s most powerful AI.
The Legal Reality of Hostile Bids
In a standard corporate takeover, an acquirer goes to the shareholders and says, "I'll give you 20% more than the current stock price if you vote out the board." But OpenAI’s "capped profit" structure is a maze. The non-profit board technically oversees the for-profit entity. This board has the power to fire the CEO—as we saw during that wild weekend in November 2023 when Sam Altman was briefly ousted.
Musk isn't a shareholder. He’s a former founder and donor.
📖 Related: LG UltraGear OLED 27GX700A: The 480Hz Speed King That Actually Makes Sense
His legal standing (standing to sue) is actually quite shaky. Most legal scholars, like those at Delaware’s Court of Chancery, usually require a direct stake to bring these kinds of claims. But Musk is swinging for the fences. He’s hoping the "founding contract" (even if it was just a series of emails and a handshake) holds up as a binding agreement.
If it does? Everything changes.
If a judge decides OpenAI breached its contract with Musk, they could be forced to divest from Microsoft. They could be forced to open-source their models. At that point, the company’s valuation—reportedly over $80 billion—would vanish. Why pay for a subscription if the weights are on GitHub?
That’s Musk’s "kill shot." It’s not a takeover to own it; it’s a takeover to dismantle it.
What about the users?
You’re probably wondering how this affects your ChatGPT subscription. In the short term, it doesn’t. But in the long term, this battle dictates whether AI becomes a public utility or a proprietary product.
If Musk wins his "hostile" legal battle, we might see a more fragmented AI landscape. If OpenAI holds the line, we’re looking at a future dominated by a few massive, closed-source giants. It’s a fork in the road for the entire industry.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Feud
A lot of folks think this is just about ego. It’s easy to dismiss Elon as a disgruntled ex-boyfriend of the tech world. But there’s a deeper philosophical divide here.
👉 See also: How to Remove Yourself From Group Text Messages Without Looking Like a Jerk
Altman believes that AGI is so dangerous that it must be controlled by a small group of people who can "switch it off" if things go south. Musk believes that a small group of people controlling AGI is the most dangerous thing possible. He wants decentralized, open-source AI so that no single person (including himself, theoretically) has the "God-key."
It’s the "Cathedral vs. the Bazaar" argument, but with stakes that could redefine human civilization.
- The "Takeover" isn't for money. Musk is already the richest person on earth. He doesn't need OpenAI’s profit.
- The "Bid" isn't a check. It's a lawsuit and a competing supercomputer.
- The "Hostile" part is real. The rhetoric coming from both sides is venomous.
Wait, let's look at the timeline. Musk left OpenAI in 2018. He said it was because of a conflict of interest with Tesla's self-driving AI. But internal reports suggest he actually tried to take control of OpenAI back then because he thought they were falling behind Google. They said no. He left.
So, in a way, the Elon Musk has launched a hostile takeover bid of OpenAI story has been going on for nearly eight years. We’re just seeing the final, most aggressive chapter now.
Actionable Steps for Navigating the AI Shift
Regardless of who "wins" this fight, the AI world is changing. You can't rely on just one ecosystem anymore. If you're a developer or a business owner, you need to be hedge-betting right now.
- Diversify your API usage. Don't just build on OpenAI. Integrate Anthropic’s Claude, Google’s Gemini, and Musk’s Grok. If one company gets tied up in a three-year legal battle that freezes their development, you don't want your business to freeze with it.
- Explore Local LLMs. Start looking at Llama 3 or other open-source models you can run on your own hardware. This is the "Elon-approved" way of ensuring you aren't dependent on a single corporate board's whims.
- Watch the Courts, not the Tweets. The real news isn't in Musk's memes on X. It's in the motions to dismiss filed in the San Francisco Superior Court. That’s where the "takeover" will actually be decided.
- Audit your data privacy. As these companies fight, their terms of service often change. Make sure you know exactly who owns the data you’re feeding into these models.
The drama between Elon Musk and OpenAI is far from over. Whether it's a "hostile takeover" or just a high-stakes corporate divorce, it’s going to dictate the pace of AI innovation for the next decade. Keep your eyes on the court filings, but keep your code portable.