Numbers don't lie, but they sure can be loud. When you start digging into the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program to figure out what percentage of crimes are committed by race, you’re basically walking into a statistical minefield. It’s messy. People argue about it on social media constantly, usually without actually looking at the spreadsheets. Honestly, if you want the real picture, you have to look at the raw data from the FBI and the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), while also acknowledging that these numbers are just "arrest data"—which isn't exactly the same thing as "crimes committed."
Let's get into it.
The most recent full-year data sets we have (looking at the 2023 and 2024 reporting cycles) show some pretty stark patterns. According to the FBI, White individuals account for the largest share of total arrests in the United States. It's about 60% to 70% of all arrests depending on the year and specific category. Specifically, for property crimes like larceny and burglary, White people make up roughly 67% of arrests. Black or African American individuals, who make up about 13% to 14% of the U.S. population, account for roughly 26% to 30% of total arrests.
Why the Gap Exists
Why does that disparity exist? It’s the million-dollar question. If you just look at the raw "what percentage of crimes are committed by race" stat, you miss the context of poverty and geography. Criminologists like Dr. Robert Sampson have pointed out for years that when you control for "neighborhood disadvantage"—things like high unemployment, low-performing schools, and lack of social services—the racial gap in crime rates starts to shrink significantly.
Basically, crime follows poverty.
If you take a poor neighborhood in Chicago and a poor neighborhood in rural West Virginia, the crime rates look surprisingly similar regardless of the skin color of the people living there. But because of historical housing patterns and economic shifts, a higher percentage of the Black population lives in high-poverty urban areas. That’s a huge factor that a simple pie chart won't tell you.
Homicide and Violent Crime: The Hard Numbers
When people talk about what percentage of crimes are committed by race, they usually focus on violent crime. This is where the data gets the most attention and causes the most friction.
In the category of "Murder and Nonnegligent Manslaughter," the numbers lean heavily. According to the FBI’s 2022-2023 data releases, Black individuals were arrested for roughly 52% of homicides, while White individuals accounted for about 45%. Other groups, including Asian and Native American populations, account for the remaining small percentage.
📖 Related: Snow This Weekend Boston: Why the Forecast Is Making Meteorologists Nervous
It's a heavy stat.
But you've also got to look at victimology. Crime in America is overwhelmingly "intraracial." That means White people mostly victimize White people, and Black people mostly victimize Black people. According to the BJS, about 80% to 90% of homicides involve victims and offenders of the same race. The idea of "stranger danger" or cross-racial crime being the norm is mostly a myth driven by sensationalized news cycles.
Aggravated Assault and Robbery
Robbery shows a similar trend to homicide, with Black individuals making up about 53% of arrests. However, as we move into "Aggravated Assault," the numbers shift back toward the general population distribution. White individuals make up about 57% of arrests for aggravated assault, compared to about 33% for Black individuals.
Asian Americans consistently show the lowest arrest rates across every single category. They make up about 6% of the population but usually less than 1.5% of arrests for violent crimes. It's a massive outlier that researchers attribute to higher average household incomes and strong community social structures.
The Problem with "Arrest Data"
Here is the thing: "Arrest" does not equal "Guilty."
When we ask what percentage of crimes are committed by race, we are using police activity as a proxy for criminal behavior. It’s not a perfect 1:1 match. Over-policing in certain neighborhoods leads to more arrests for things like drug possession, even though self-report surveys show that drug use rates are nearly identical across racial lines.
Take marijuana, for example.
👉 See also: Removing the Department of Education: What Really Happened with the Plan to Shutter the Agency
For decades, Black and White Americans have used cannabis at almost the same rates. Yet, Black Americans have historically been 3.6 times more likely to be arrested for it. If you only looked at the arrest stats, you’d think one group was "committing" more crime, when in reality, they were just being watched more closely by law enforcement.
The Hispanic/Latino Data Gap
You might notice that "Hispanic" or "Latino" often isn't listed as a separate race in older FBI reports. They are an ethnicity, not a race. So, in many data sets, Hispanic individuals are grouped under the "White" category. This can make the White arrest percentage look higher than it would be if the categories were separated.
Recent updates to the FBI's NIBRS (National Incident-Based Reporting System) are trying to fix this. When you pull Hispanic data specifically, they generally fall in the middle—higher arrest rates than Asian Americans but lower than Black Americans for most violent offenses. In 2022, Hispanic individuals accounted for about 19% of the population and roughly 20-25% of arrests for certain property crimes, showing a closer alignment with their share of the population.
White-Collar Crime: The Invisible Stats
We talk a lot about "street crime," but what about "suite crime"?
When looking at what percentage of crimes are committed by race, white-collar offenses like embezzlement, fraud, and tax evasion are often ignored. These aren't usually the crimes that show up on the nightly news, but they cost the economy billions more than petty theft or robbery.
In the category of "Embezzlement," White individuals make up about 62% of arrests. For "Fraud," it's about 65%. These numbers actually align pretty closely with the racial makeup of the professional workforce. Because White Americans still hold a majority of corporate leadership positions, they have more "opportunity" to commit these types of crimes.
It's about access. You can't embezzle from a bank if you don't work at the bank.
✨ Don't miss: Quién ganó para presidente en USA: Lo que realmente pasó y lo que viene ahora
Real-World Nuance: The Role of Age and Gender
If you really want to understand who is committing crime, race is actually a weaker predictor than age and gender.
Men commit about 80% to 90% of all violent crimes. Period. Across every racial group, the "crime curve" peaks in the late teens and early twenties and then falls off a cliff once people hit 30. If you’re a 45-year-old man, regardless of your race, you’re statistically very unlikely to go out and rob a liquor store.
So, when we fixate on the percentage of crimes committed by race, we're often ignoring the fact that the vast majority of crime is committed by a very small slice of the population: young men in high-poverty environments.
The Impact of Education
There is a direct correlation between high school graduation rates and crime. A report by the Economic Policy Institute found that increasing the high school completion rate for men by just 1% would save the U.S. up to $1.4 billion a year in reduced costs from crime.
When you see a racial disparity in crime stats, you are often seeing a racial disparity in school funding and graduation rates. It's all connected.
How to Read the Data Without Getting Fooled
If you’re looking at these stats on your own, keep these three things in mind:
- Look for the "Rate" per 100,000: Raw numbers are misleading because there are more White people in the U.S. than any other group. To compare fairly, you have to look at the rate per 100,000 people in that specific demographic.
- Check the Source: Only trust the FBI's CDE (Crime Data Explorer) or the BJS. Third-party websites often cherry-pick one year or one specific city to prove a point.
- Mind the "Unsolved" Gap: About 50% of violent crimes and 80% of property crimes go unsolved. We actually don't know the race of the perpetrator for a huge chunk of the crime that happens in America. We only know the race of the people who got caught.
The conversation about what percentage of crimes are committed by race isn't going away, but it's one that requires more than just a glance at a headline. It's a mix of socioeconomics, geography, and systemic policy.
Actionable Next Steps
If you want to look deeper into this or use this data for a project or policy discussion, here is what you should actually do:
- Visit the FBI Crime Data Explorer: Don't take a summary's word for it. Use the filters to look at your specific state or city.
- Compare Crime to Poverty Maps: Overlay your local crime data with a map of household income. You will almost always see that the "high crime" areas are the "low income" areas, regardless of who lives there.
- Support Diversion Programs: Data shows that programs focusing on job placement and education for at-risk youth are more effective at lowering these percentages than increased policing alone.
- Read the NCVS: The National Crime Victimization Survey asks people if they've been victims of crime, even if they didn't report it to the police. It gives a much better "real world" view than arrest records.
Understanding the data is the first step toward actually fixing the issues that lead to crime in the first place. Statistics are a tool, not a destiny.