People usually think of the stars when they talk about "the others." They look up. But for a few hours in a wood-panelled room in Washington D.C., everyone was looking down. Deep down. The aliens in the ocean congress meeting—officially known as the House Oversight Committee hearing on Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP)—basically flipped the script on the whole "little green men" trope. It wasn't about Mars. It was about the "transmedium" capabilities of crafts that seem to move through water and air as if the laws of physics are just polite suggestions they’ve decided to ignore.
Honestly, it’s wild.
We’ve spent decades scanning radio waves from distant galaxies while, according to some of the most decorated veterans in the U.S. military, there’s something weird happening right in our "backyard" waters. When David Grusch, a former intelligence official, sat down under oath, he didn't just talk about crashed saucers. He talked about "underwater anomalies" that have been tracked by Navy sensors for years. It’s not just sci-fi fluff anymore. This is entered into the Congressional Record.
Why the Navy is Obsessed with the Deep
The ocean is huge. Like, terrifyingly huge. We’ve mapped more of the surface of the Moon and Mars than we have of our own seabed. That’s why the aliens in the ocean congress meeting felt so grounded in reality; the military isn't chasing ghosts, they’re chasing sonar hits.
Retired Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet has been one of the most vocal experts on this. He’s not some guy with a tinfoil hat. He’s a guy who ran the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Gallaudet has gone on record—and shared his insights during these briefings—about a specific video from 2019. It shows a spherical object flying over the ocean before dipping into the water without a splash. No wake. No spray. It just... entered.
Think about the physics of that for a second.
When a plane hits water, it disintegrates. When a diver hits water from a high board, they need a specific form to avoid injury. But these objects, dubbed "USOs" (Unidentified Submerged Objects), move through the medium of water as easily as they move through air. Scientists call this "transmedium" travel. If you’re looking for a smoking gun for non-human technology, this is it. We don't have engines that can do that. Not even close.
What the Witnesses Actually Told Congress
The hearing wasn't a bunch of people talking about abductions. It was clinical. It was dry. And that made it scarier.
📖 Related: Whos Winning The Election Rn Polls: The January 2026 Reality Check
Commander David Fravor, the guy who chased the "Tic Tac" UFO back in 2004 off the coast of California, described something that most people forget about that encounter. Before the Tic Tac started mimicking his flight patterns, he saw a disturbance in the water. It was a cross-shaped object just below the surface, much larger than the craft in the air. The water was "frothing," even though the sea was calm everywhere else. It looked like something was docking or hovering just beneath the waves.
- The object showed no visible means of lift.
- It moved at hypersonic speeds without a sonic boom.
- It transitioned from 80,000 feet to sea level in seconds.
- It disappeared and reappeared at a "cap point" miles away before the pilots could get there.
This isn't just one guy's story. It was backed up by radar data from the USS Princeton. When people talk about the aliens in the ocean congress meeting, they’re usually referencing this kind of hard data that makes the "oceanic" origin theory so much more plausible than the "distant star" theory. If you wanted to hide on Earth, would you hide in a forest? No. You’d hide in the 70% of the planet where humans literally cannot breathe or see.
The "Underwater Base" Theory: Fact vs. Speculation
Okay, let's get into the weeds. During these discussions, the idea of "bases" comes up. It sounds like a movie plot. But the logic used by some researchers, and hinted at in certain classified briefings mentioned by Congressmen like Tim Burchett and Anna Paulina Luna, is simple: if these objects are seen entering and exiting the water constantly, they’re going somewhere.
The Guadalupe Island area is a hotspot. So is the coast of Florida.
There’s a specific term used in intelligence circles: "Fast Movers." These are acoustic signatures picked up by sonar that move at hundreds of knots. For context, the fastest nuclear submarines do maybe 35-40 knots. These "Fast Movers" are doing 400. Under water. Without being crushed by the pressure.
During the aliens in the ocean congress meeting, the frustration from lawmakers was palpable. They weren't just mad about the "aliens." They were mad about the "Over-Classification." They want to know why the Navy’s underwater sensor data (the SOSUS system) is kept so tightly under wraps that even the people funding it can’t see the reports on these anomalies. It suggests a "program" that exists outside of Congressional oversight.
Is it Really Aliens? Or Just "Them"?
We keep using the word "aliens," but the experts at the hearing were very careful. They used the term "Non-Human Intelligence" (NHI).
👉 See also: Who Has Trump Pardoned So Far: What Really Happened with the 47th President's List
Why? Because they might not be from space.
There is a growing "Interdimensional" or "Ultraterrestrial" hypothesis. This suggests that whatever is in our oceans has been here as long as we have. Maybe longer. If you’re a civilization that lives in the deep ocean, you’re protected from solar flares, asteroid impacts, and the surface-level drama of human wars. You’re stable. You’re hidden.
Representative Jared Moskowitz pointed out during the sessions that if a foreign adversary had this tech, they’d own us. If Russia or China had crafts that could go from the bottom of the Atlantic to Washington D.C. in three minutes, the war would be over. Since the US hasn't been "conquered" by a known human power using this tech, the logical conclusion is that it’s either ours—or it’s not human.
The Stigma is Dying (Slowly)
For a long time, talking about the aliens in the ocean congress meeting would get a politician laughed out of the room. Not anymore.
The turning point was the 2017 New York Times expose that revealed the existence of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP). Since then, the floodgates have opened. We have Ryan Graves, a former F/A-18 pilot, testifying that these sightings were a "daily occurrence" for his squadron. Imagine going to work every day and seeing objects that defy gravity, and being told by your superiors to just... keep your mouth shut.
That’s what changed. The pilots started talking.
The ocean aspect adds a layer of "National Security" that the air alone doesn't. Our undersea fiber optic cables carry the world’s internet. Our nuclear deterrent relies on submarines being "invisible." If there is something down there that can track our subs with ease, we have a massive tactical problem.
✨ Don't miss: Why the 2013 Moore Oklahoma Tornado Changed Everything We Knew About Survival
What Most People Get Wrong About the Hearings
People expected a "body" to be wheeled out. That didn't happen.
Instead, what we got was a roadmap. We got names of programs like "Gateway" and "Sentinel." We got specific locations of "crash retrieval" sites. The aliens in the ocean congress meeting was about the bureaucracy of secrecy. It was about whistleblowers claiming that a "shadow government" or a group of private contractors (like Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman, though they deny it) are holding onto "exotic material" found in or near the ocean.
- It’s not just "lights in the sky." We’re talking about "physical craft" that show "biological signatures."
- The government isn't a monolith. The Pentagon is fighting with Congress. One side wants to hide it; the other wants to tax it or oversee it.
- The data is real. Sensor data, thermal imaging, and multiple-witness accounts aren't "hallucinations."
How to Track This Moving Forward
If you’re interested in where this goes next, stop looking for "leaked" shaky footage on YouTube. It’s mostly fake. Instead, follow the legislative trail.
The UAP Disclosure Act, originally championed by Chuck Schumer, is the most important piece of paper in this whole saga. It uses the term "Non-Human Intelligence" over 20 times. It explicitly mentions "recovered technologies of unknown origin." This isn't the language of people who think they’re chasing weather balloons.
Keep an eye on the "Immaculate Constellation" leaks. This is the alleged code name for a secret Pentagon database of high-quality UAP imagery and sensor data. If this comes to light, the aliens in the ocean congress meeting will look like just the tip of a very, very large iceberg.
Next Steps for the Informed Citizen:
To truly understand the implications of the aliens in the ocean congress meeting, you should move past the headlines and look at the source material.
- Review the "UAP Disclosure Act" language: Read the specific definitions of "transmedium craft" in the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). It provides the legal framework for what the government is actually looking for.
- Study the Sol Foundation papers: This is a group of legitimate academics (like Dr. Garry Nolan of Stanford) who are treating this as a serious scientific inquiry rather than a conspiracy theory.
- Monitor the AARO reports: The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) is the official government body for this. While critics say they are "de-bunkers," their quarterly reports are the only official channel for new sighting data.
- Support Transparency Legislation: Contact local representatives to support the "UAP Transparency Act," which aims to declassify documents that are over 25 years old related to these phenomena.
The ocean remains the final frontier on Earth. As the Congressional record now shows, it might be more crowded than we ever dared to imagine. Regardless of whether these are "aliens," "ancient residents," or "top-secret drones," the reality of something unexplained in our waters is now a matter of public record. Dealing with that reality is the next great challenge for both science and government.