Basketball has changed. You see it every night on League Pass. Guys are pulling up from the logo like it's a layup, and nobody even blinks anymore. But when we talk about hall of fame 3s, we aren't just talking about a lucky hot streak or one season where a guy shot 42% from deep. We’re talking about the fundamental shift in how the game of basketball is played, evaluated, and immortalized in Springfield.
It's about gravity.
If you can’t shoot, you’re a liability. If you can shoot, you’re an asset. But if you hit those hall of fame 3s—the kind that define a decade—you become a legend. Most people think the three-point revolution started with Steph Curry. They're wrong. It’s been a slow burn for forty years, and the barrier to entry for the Hall of Fame is getting higher because the league is suddenly full of "good" shooters. Good isn't enough anymore.
What Actually Defines Hall of Fame 3s?
Let's be real for a second. Is Kyle Korver a Hall of Famer? He’s top ten all-time in makes. He had a season where he shot 53.6% from downtown. That is literally insane. But most voters look at him and see a specialist, not a cornerstone. This is the great debate in modern basketball history. To reach that "Hall of Fame" tier of shooting, you need a mix of volume, efficiency, and—this is the part people forget—playoff "clutch" factor.
Think about Reggie Miller. Reggie didn't have the handle of Kyrie or the frame of LeBron. He had a quick release and a death wish for the New York Knicks. He retired as the all-time leader in makes. That's the baseline. You have to move the needle. You have to change how the opposing coach draws up his defensive schemes. If the scouting report doesn't start with "don't let him breathe behind the arc," you aren't hitting hall of fame 3s.
Ray Allen is the gold standard here. People remember the shot in Miami—Game 6, corner, no room, pure ice—but they forget he was a slasher in Milwaukee and a primary option in Seattle. His shooting evolved. It became his identity. When we look at the tracking data from Second Spectrum or NBA.com, we see that the players who end up in Springfield are the ones who make "contested" shots at a rate others make "open" ones.
The Evolution of the Arc
The line wasn't even there in the early days. It was a gimmick. ABA stuff. When the NBA adopted it in 1979, Larry Bird was one of the few who realized it was a weapon. Bird didn't take ten a game. He didn't need to. He just needed to make the ones that broke your spirit.
Then came the 90s. The line was shortened for a few years to boost scoring. Suddenly, everyone thought they were a marksman. But the true hall of fame 3s stayed rare. Steve Kerr. Glen Rice. These guys were outliers in a league that still obsessed over the "post-up" game and the "mid-range" jumper. If you look at the shot charts from 1995 versus 2025, it looks like two different sports. Literally.
💡 You might also like: NFL Pick 'em Predictions: Why You're Probably Overthinking the Divisional Round
The Curry Threshold
We have to talk about Stephen Curry because he broke the math. Before Steph, shooting 40% on seven attempts a game was considered elite. Now? That’s just a Tuesday for a lot of guys. Steph didn't just make shots; he expanded the geometry of the court. Defenses have to pick him up at 35 feet. That creates "gravity," sucking defenders away from the rim.
This creates a problem for the Hall of Fame.
If the average player now shoots better than the stars of the 80s, how do we judge greatness? Honestly, it has to be about how you compared to your peers at the time. Klay Thompson belongs in the Hall because he has the greatest "heat check" ability in the history of the sport. 60 points on 11 dribbles? That’s not just shooting. That’s a glitch in the Matrix.
The Numbers Behind the Legends
Statistics can be boring, but in the world of hall of fame 3s, they are the only thing that doesn't lie. Look at the "True Shooting Percentage" (TS%). It factors in the added value of the three-point shot.
- Stephen Curry: Career 42%+, nearly 4,000 makes. Locks.
- Ray Allen: 2,973 makes, 40% career. The pioneer of the modern form.
- James Harden: Massive volume. People hate the style, but you can't argue with the production.
- Damian Lillard: The king of the "deep" three. Range is his calling card.
But what about the guys on the bubble? Buddy Hield? Duncan Robinson? They have the percentages. They have the volume. But they lack the "gravity" that dictates a playoff series. To get into the Hall based on your jumper, you have to be more than a turret. You have to be a threat that changes the entire ecosystem of the floor.
Why "Specialists" Often Miss the Cut
There’s a reason Steve Kerr isn't in the Hall of Fame as a player (he’s in for his coaching/contributions, but you get the point). He was the most accurate shooter ever for a long time. But he was a role player. Hall of Fame 3s are usually attached to players who can do something else—pass, rebound, or lead a locker room.
The Hall of Fame is about impact.
📖 Related: Why the Marlins Won World Series Titles Twice and Then Disappeared
If you look at guys like Dirk Nowitzki, his shooting was revolutionary because of his size. A 7-footer trailing on the break and canning a triple? That was unheard of in 1998. Dirk’s shooting opened the door for Kevin Durant and Victor Wembanyama. That's the legacy. If you don't change the game, you're just a guy who was good at his job.
The Lost Art of the Mid-Range 3
Wait, that’s a contradiction, right? Not really. There’s a specific type of shooter who lives in that 22-to-24-foot range but treats it with the precision of a free throw.
Chris Paul isn't known as a "3-point shooter" in the traditional sense, but his late-career adaptation to the long ball is what kept him elite into his late 30s. He’s an example of how hall of fame 3s aren't just for the young and bouncy. It’s a skill that ages better than any other. You might lose your vertical, but you rarely lose your touch.
Misconceptions About Modern Shooting
One of the biggest myths is that "nobody plays defense anymore." That’s nonsense. Defenses are faster, smarter, and more switchable than ever. The reason players are making more hall of fame 3s is simply because the training is better.
Kids are growing up with shooting coaches. They have "Noah" systems tracking the arc of every shot in practice. They have data telling them exactly where their "hot zones" are. Back in the day, Larry Bird was shooting in a cold gym in French Lick by himself. Today’s shooters are products of a high-tech assembly line.
How to Evaluate Future Hall of Famers
If you're trying to figure out who the next great shooter is, don't just look at the box score. Look at how the defense reacts when they cross half-court.
Is the defender "top-locking"? Are they "shading" him toward the help? Are they "doubling" off a screen? These are the marks of a Hall of Fame talent.
👉 See also: Why Funny Fantasy Football Names Actually Win Leagues
Take a guy like Tyrese Haliburton or Trae Young. Their forms are weird. They wouldn't be in a textbook. But the results? They’re undeniable. They create offense out of thin air. That is the essence of what we're talking about. It’s not just about the ball going through the hoop; it’s about the fear it instills in the opponent.
Actionable Steps for Analyzing the Greats
If you really want to understand the mechanics and the impact of these legendary shooters, you should stop watching the ball and start watching the feet.
- Analyze Footwork: Notice how Klay Thompson squares his shoulders in mid-air. It doesn't matter how he catches it; his feet are always perfect by the time he releases.
- Check the "Off-Ball" Movement: Watch how Reggie Miller or Rip Hamilton (who was more mid-range, but the principle applies) used screens to create an extra inch of space.
- Study the "Dip": Almost every great shooter "dips" the ball to their waist before bringing it up. It creates rhythm.
- Look at Context: A 35% shooter on a team with no spacing is often more impressive than a 40% shooter playing next to LeBron James. Context is everything in the Hall of Fame debate.
The reality is that hall of fame 3s are becoming more common, which ironically makes them harder to achieve. To stand out now, you have to be truly "generational." You have to hit shots that make the crowd gasp and the opposing coach throw his clipboard.
Basketball is a game of runs, and nothing fuels a run like a barrage from deep. The players who mastered this aren't just shooters—they are the architects of the modern NBA. They took a line on the floor and turned it into the most important real estate in sports.
If you want to track who is next in line for this honor, keep a close eye on the "attempts per game" combined with "win shares." The guys who take the most, make a high percentage, and actually win games? Those are your future legends. It's a short list, but that's why the Hall of Fame is so hard to get into. You can't just be good. You have to be historical.
Start by looking at the career leaders in "3-Point Field Goals Per 100 Possessions." This levels the playing field across different eras. You'll see names like Buddy Hield and Duncan Robinson high up there, but you'll also see why the "all-around" stars like Luka Dončić are slowly climbing the ranks. The game isn't just about the shot anymore; it's about the threat of the shot.
Next time you watch a game, don't just count the makes. Count the number of times a defender panics because a certain player has the ball behind the arc. That panic is the greatest compliment a shooter can ever receive. That is the true mark of a Hall of Famer.