National security is usually a quiet business. Most of the time, the public only hears about the "chatter" after a threat has been neutralized or, unfortunately, after something goes wrong. But behind the scenes, there is a specific, high-stakes ritual that keeps the country running: the FBI DHS conference calls with governors. These aren't just casual check-ins or bureaucratic formalities. They are the literal nervous system of American domestic security.
Think about it.
The federal government has the intel, but the states have the "boots on the ground." When a threat emerges—whether it’s a foreign cyberattack targeting power grids or concerns about domestic civil unrest—the bridge between Washington D.C. and your state capital is a secure phone line. Honestly, most people don't even realize these calls are happening until a major election or a national crisis hits the news cycle.
It’s about coordination. It’s about making sure the guy in a suit in D.C. and the governor in a state house three thousand miles away are looking at the exact same data.
What Actually Happens on FBI DHS Conference Calls With Governors?
People often imagine these calls like something out of a Tom Clancy novel. Dark rooms. Blue-lit screens. High-level officers whispering about classified satellites. The reality is a bit more grounded, though no less intense. Usually, these briefings involve the Director of the FBI, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the nation’s governors (along with their top state police or National Guard advisors).
The goal? Situational awareness.
They talk about "threat vectors." This could mean anything from a specific extremist group's online manifesto to a spike in ransomware attacks hitting municipal water systems. During the lead-up to the 2024 elections and into the 2026 cycle, these calls have become increasingly focused on "foreign malign influence." Basically, they are looking for ways that adversaries—think Russia, China, or Iran—might be trying to stir the pot in local communities.
The feds share the "what" and the "why," while the governors ask the "how do we stop this in my backyard" questions. It’s a messy, fast-paced exchange of information that has to happen in real-time. If the DHS sees a credible threat to a state's voting infrastructure, they can't wait for a formal letter to be mailed. They get on the horn.
The Role of "The Fusion Centers"
You've probably never heard of a Fusion Center, but they are the reason these conference calls work. These are state-owned and operated hubs where local, state, and federal law enforcement sit in the same room. During these high-level FBI DHS conference calls with governors, the Fusion Centers act as the translators. They take the high-level intel from the FBI and turn it into actionable orders for the state trooper on the highway or the IT director at the county clerk’s office.
Without this link, the calls would just be noise.
🔗 Read more: When is the Next Hurricane Coming 2024: What Most People Get Wrong
Cybersecurity: The New Front Line
If you looked at the transcript of one of these calls from twenty years ago, it would be all about physical threats. Terrorism. Bombs. Physical infrastructure. Today? It’s almost all digital.
Cybersecurity is the "everything" threat now.
When the FBI and DHS gather the governors for a call, a massive portion of the time is spent discussing "critical infrastructure." We aren't just talking about banks. We’re talking about the software that controls your local hospital’s oxygen supply or the digital ledger that tracks who actually owns a piece of property in a rural county.
Governors are often the ones left holding the bag when a state agency gets hit by a "lock-and-leak" ransomware attack. They use these calls to beg for federal resources or to get the "indicators of compromise" (the digital fingerprints) that the FBI has found in other states. It’s a weird kind of support group for people trying to keep the lights on while invisible hackers try to turn them off.
Kinda terrifying, right?
Why the Transparency Debate Never Goes Away
There is a natural tension here. On one hand, the public wants to know what their leaders are talking about. On the other hand, if you broadcast these calls, the "bad guys" are listening too.
Critics often argue that these FBI DHS conference calls with governors are too secretive. They worry that "threat assessments" can be used to justify over-policing or to suppress legitimate political protests. We saw this tension peak during the 2020 protests and again during the various controversies surrounding the 2024 election cycle.
Christopher Wray, the FBI Director, and various DHS Secretaries have repeatedly testified that these calls are strictly "apolitical." They claim the focus is on public safety and the protection of constitutional rights. But when you get 50 governors—each with their own political agenda—on a call with federal law enforcement, things can get complicated.
It’s a balancing act.
💡 You might also like: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection
Some governors have been very vocal after these calls, hopping on X (formerly Twitter) or doing press conferences to warn their constituents about specific threats. Others keep it close to the vest. This inconsistency can lead to a lot of confusion for the average citizen. Who do you believe? The governor who says everything is fine, or the one who says the sky is falling?
The 2026 Landscape: New Threats on the Radar
As we move through 2026, the nature of these calls is shifting again. We are seeing a massive uptick in discussions regarding AI-generated disinformation.
"Deepfakes" aren't just for making funny videos anymore. They are being used to create fake audio of election officials or fake videos of governors declaring states of emergency. On recent calls, the DHS has been providing "detection toolkits" to state governments to help them verify what is real and what is a machine-generated lie.
Then there’s the issue of domestic extremism.
The FBI has been very clear in recent years: the biggest threat to the U.S. right now often comes from within. Managing this is a political minefield for governors. How do you talk about domestic threats without sounding like you're attacking your own voters? The FBI tries to provide the raw data, but the governors have to handle the PR. It’s a tough gig.
How States Actually Use This Intel
So, the call ends. The governor hangs up the secure phone. What happens next?
It’s not just talk. These calls trigger specific actions:
- Activation of the National Guard: If the DHS warns of a massive natural disaster or a large-scale civil disturbance, governors use that info to pre-position troops.
- Emergency Funding: Often, these calls serve as the "go-ahead" for a governor to declare a state of emergency, which unlocks state and federal dollars.
- Public Safety Alerts: You know those emergency alerts that pop up on your phone? Sometimes the "why" behind those starts on an FBI conference call.
- Cyber Defense: State CIOs (Chief Information Officers) might be told to patch a specific piece of software within the hour because the FBI saw it being exploited in another state.
It’s a massive logistical chain.
What Most People Get Wrong About Federal Coordination
One of the biggest misconceptions is that the FBI is "giving orders" to governors. That’s not how the U.S. system works.
📖 Related: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think
The U.S. is a collection of sovereign states. The FBI doesn't have the authority to tell a governor how to run their state police. Instead, these calls are a "service." The feds provide the intelligence, and the governors decide how to use it.
Sometimes, they completely disagree.
We’ve seen instances where federal agencies warned of threats that governors dismissed as "overblown" or "politically motivated." Conversely, governors have often slammed the feds for not sharing enough information. There’s a constant tug-of-war over who "owns" the data.
Improving Your Own Security Based on These Trends
While you aren't on these calls, you can read the room. When you see news reports that the FBI DHS conference calls with governors are focusing on a specific topic—like hospital security or election integrity—it’s a signal.
Pay attention to the warnings. If the DHS is briefing governors on a new type of phishing scam targeting state employees, there’s a high chance that same scam is coming for your personal inbox.
Trust but verify. In an era of AI-generated chaos, look for "official" channels. If your governor’s office and the local FBI field office are saying the same thing, it’s likely legitimate. If they are contradicting each other, wait for the dust to settle before panicking.
Understand the "why." These calls exist because our world is hyper-connected. A hack in California can shut down a pipeline in Georgia. We are only as strong as the weakest link in the communication chain.
Actionable Steps for the Informed Citizen
Don't just be a passive consumer of "breaking news." Take a few proactive steps to understand the security environment in your own state.
- Follow your State's Emergency Management Agency (EMA): These are the people who actually implement the stuff discussed on the FBI calls. Their social media feeds are usually the first place real info hits the public.
- Monitor the FBI "National Press Office" releases: They often put out "Public Service Announcements" (PSAs) immediately following these major briefings to give the public a sanitized version of the threat.
- Audit your own digital "Infrastructure": If the feds are worried about cyber threats to states, you should be worried about your own. Use a password manager. Turn on 2FA. Don't be the easy target.
- Look for "Joint Statements": When the FBI and DHS issue a joint statement, it usually means the information was important enough to warrant one of these governor calls. Read them. They are surprisingly informative.
The relationship between federal law enforcement and state executives is a permanent part of the American landscape. It’s not always perfect, and it’s definitely not always transparent, but it’s the primary way the country tries to stay one step ahead of the next crisis. Keeping an eye on these interactions gives you a much better "weather map" of the risks facing the country than any 24-hour news cycle ever could.