History isn't just a collection of dusty papers. Sometimes, it’s a living, breathing conflict that shapes how people live right now. Take the Treaty of New York. Signed in 1790, this wasn't some minor real estate deal. It was a high-stakes gamble between a brand-new United States government and the Muscogee (Creek) Nation.
Henry Knox and Alexander Hamilton were there. So was Alexander McGillivray, a man who basically played the Americans and the Spanish against each other like a grandmaster.
The Chaos Before the Ink Dried
Georgia was a mess. In the late 1780s, the state of Georgia was basically acting like a rogue nation, trying to grab Muscogee land through "treaties" that the Native leaders didn't actually agree to. George Washington was stressed. He knew that if a full-scale war broke out on the frontier, the bankrupt U.S. government would collapse. It couldn't afford a war. Honestly, it could barely afford the paper the laws were written on.
Washington sent commissioners to the South to fix things. They failed. The Creeks weren't interested in talking to people who let settlers steal their crops. So, Washington tried something different. He invited Alexander McGillivray to New York City, which was the nation’s capital at the time.
Imagine the scene. McGillivray arrives with a massive delegation of twenty-six Creek chiefs. They marched through the streets of Manhattan. People stared. This wasn't just a meeting; it was a diplomatic summit between two sovereign powers. The Treaty of New York was supposed to be the "perpetual peace and friendship" that saved the Southeast from a bloodbath.
Alexander McGillivray: The smartest guy in the room?
You’ve got to understand who McGillivray was. He was the son of a Scottish trader and a high-ranking Wind Clan woman. He was literate, wealthy, and incredibly savvy. He held a commission as a colonel in the Spanish army while he was negotiating with Washington. Talk about playing both sides.
He knew the U.S. wanted to stop the Creek Nation from trading with the Spanish in Florida. He used that leverage to get the best deal possible, even though he knew he was giving up land. He wasn't a "sellout"—he was a pragmatist trying to prevent his people from being wiped out by an aggressive Georgia militia.
💡 You might also like: 39 Carl St and Kevin Lau: What Actually Happened at the Cole Valley Property
What the Treaty of New York Actually Said
The document was signed on August 7, 1790. It was a massive deal for the Federal government because it was the first treaty negotiated and ratified under the new U.S. Constitution.
- The Muscogee Nation gave up a huge chunk of land east of the Oconee River.
- The U.S. guaranteed the remaining Creek lands would be protected from white settlers.
- The Creeks were allowed to punish non-Native people who trespassed on their land.
- The U.S. promised to provide tools and training for "civilization," a condescending term for turning hunters into farmers.
But there was a "Secret Article." Always is, right?
The secret part of the Treaty of New York gave McGillivray a commission as a Brigadier General in the U.S. Army with a salary of $1,200 a year. It also allowed the Creeks to import goods through American ports without paying U.S. duties, effectively bypassing the Spanish monopoly.
Georgia was furious
You might think a peace treaty would be celebrated. Nope. Georgia politicians were absolutely livid. They felt the Federal government had overstepped its bounds by "giving away" land that Georgia claimed was hers. This was one of the earliest sparks of the "States' Rights" fire that would eventually lead to the Civil War.
Basically, Georgia ignored the treaty.
Settlers kept crossing the Oconee River. The federal government, despite its big promises in the Treaty of New York, didn't really have the troops or the willpower to kick out the squatters. It’s a recurring theme in American history: the feds sign a paper, and the locals ignore it while the feds look the other way.
📖 Related: Effingham County Jail Bookings 72 Hours: What Really Happened
Why this matters for tribal sovereignty in 2026
If you think this is just 18th-century drama, look at the legal battles happening in Oklahoma and the Southeast right now. The Treaty of New York established a precedent for "federal supremacy" in Indian affairs. When modern tribes fight for their water rights or jurisdictional boundaries, they often point back to these early treaties.
These aren't just old promises. They are legal contracts.
When the Supreme Court ruled in McGirt v. Oklahoma (2020), it sent shockwaves through the legal system because it affirmed that a reservation isn't "gone" just because people stopped talking about it. Treaties like the one signed in 1790 are the bedrock of that sovereignty. If the U.S. can ignore the Treaty of New York, then every contract the government signs is technically worthless.
The Tragedy of Broken Promises
The peace didn't last. It couldn't. The pressure of westward expansion was like a tidal wave. Within a decade, the "perpetual peace" was failing. By the time the War of 1812 rolled around, the Creek Nation was split between those who wanted to stick to the treaty and the "Red Sticks" who wanted to fight back against American encroachment.
That internal rift led to the Creek War. Then came Andrew Jackson.
Jackson didn't care about the nuances of the Treaty of New York. He wanted the land. The Treaty of Fort Jackson in 1814 eventually stripped away millions of more acres, making the 1790 agreement look like a polite suggestion rather than a binding law.
👉 See also: Joseph Stalin Political Party: What Most People Get Wrong
How to use this history today
Understanding the Treaty of New York changes how you look at American geography. If you live in middle Georgia, you are standing on land that was once the "unbreakable" border of a sovereign nation.
Research the land titles in your area. If you are in the Southeast, look at the historical maps of the 1790 cession. It’s eye-opening to see where the "Indian Line" actually fell.
Support tribal archives. The Muscogee (Creek) Nation maintains their own history and cultural records. Instead of just reading what white historians wrote in the 1950s, check out the resources from the Muscogee Nation Cultural Center. They offer a perspective that you won't find in standard textbooks.
Watch the courts. Tribal sovereignty cases are constantly hitting the federal docket. Pay attention when "treaty rights" are mentioned. It’s not just about fishing or hunting; it’s about the fundamental legal structure of the United States.
The Treaty of New York was a moment when the U.S. tried to act like a fair neighbor. It failed in practice, but the legal reality it created still dictates how the government must interact with Native nations today. Respecting those old papers is the only way to ensure the "honor of the United States" actually means something.
Read the primary sources yourself. Don't take a textbook's word for it. Look at the letters Washington wrote to Knox. Look at the journals of the Creek delegates. History is a lot more complicated—and a lot more interesting—when you see the actual signatures on the page.