Tromaville isn’t exactly a vacation spot. It's a dump. But for fans of 80s cult cinema, it’s home. When The Toxic Avenger Part II finally hit theaters in 1989, it had a massive burden on its shoulders. The first film was a fluke hit. It turned a low-budget indie studio into a household name for people who liked their gore with a side of slapstick. Lloyd Kaufman and Michael Herz had a problem, though. They had too much footage.
They went to Japan to film a sequel. They came back with a movie so long it had to be chopped in half. That’s how we ended up with a Part II and a Part III released in quick succession. If you’ve ever watched it and felt like the pacing was a bit manic, well, that’s because you’re basically watching the first act of a giant epic stretched into its own feature. It’s weird. It’s loud. Honestly, it’s one of the most "Troma" things Troma ever did.
Why Japan Became the Backdrop for The Toxic Avenger Part II
Most people assume the move to Tokyo was just a random creative choice. It wasn't. By the late 80s, Toxie was surprisingly huge in Japan. There was a genuine cult following there that rivaled the US fan base. Lloyd Kaufman saw an opportunity to capitalize on international co-productions, which were becoming a lifeline for independent cinema.
The plot kicks off with the Apocalypse Inc. corporate villains—standard 80s bad guys—tricking Toxie into leaving New Jersey. They tell him his father is in Japan. It’s a classic "fish out of water" setup, but with more radioactive sludge andKabuki influences.
Filming in Tokyo wasn’t easy for the crew. They were working with a shoestring budget in one of the most expensive cities on the planet. You can see the raw, guerrilla-style filmmaking in every frame of the Tokyo sequences. They didn't always have permits. Sometimes they just ran and gunned. This gives The Toxic Avenger Part II a frantic energy that the later, more polished sequels lack. It feels like a fever dream because, for the production team, it probably was.
The Problem With the "Mop"
One thing fans notice immediately is the change in Toxie’s look and voice. Ron Fazio took over much of the physical work, and the suit was updated. It’s more detailed than the 1984 original but somehow feels different in its movement. The voice changed too. John Altamura started the role, but due to some behind-the-scenes friction, Fazio ended up doing a lot of the heavy lifting.
📖 Related: Finding the Best Yoda Star Wars Pictures Without the Usual Filler
If you look closely at the "Toxie" in certain scenes, you can actually spot the transition between actors. It’s that kind of low-budget charm that makes the movie work for some and fail for others. You’re not watching The Avengers. You’re watching a guy in a rubber suit beat up people with a mop in the middle of a Japanese fish market.
A Shift in Tone: From Horror to Cartoony Satire
The 1984 original was mean. It had a dark, gritty edge that bordered on disturbing in a few scenes—think of the infamous car scene. By the time The Toxic Avenger Part II rolled around, the studio realized Toxie was becoming a hero for kids. Yeah, kids. There was a cartoon in development (Toxic Crusaders), and the edge was being sanded off for a more "superhero" vibe.
This sequel is where that shift is most visible. The violence is still there, sure. There are limbs lost and plenty of goo. But it’s presented with a Looney Tunes logic. It’s slapstick. The social commentary is also tuned up. Troma has always been obsessed with the idea of "big business vs. the little guy," and Apocalypse Inc. is the personification of that 80s corporate greed.
- The Villainy: Apocalypse Inc. isn't just a business; they're basically a cartoon cult.
- The Setting: Moving from the literal sewers of Jersey to the bright neon of Tokyo changed the color palette of the franchise forever.
- The Stakes: It wasn't just about cleaning up the neighborhood anymore; it was about global corporate takeovers.
The "Part 2 and 3" Split
It’s worth noting that the production was originally meant to be one film. When the editors realized they had five hours of usable footage, the decision was made to split it. This is why The Toxic Avenger Part II feels like it has a climax that doesn't quite resolve everything, and why Part III: The Last Temptation of Toxie feels like it’s made of leftover scraps.
If you watch them back-to-back, you can see the seams. But as a standalone experience, Part II is the stronger half. It has the biggest budget Troma had seen up to that point, and it shows in the set pieces. They really tried to make a "big" movie.
Does the Sequel Hold Up Today?
Honestly, it depends on what you want from a B-movie. If you're looking for the dark, cynical horror of the original, you might be disappointed. This is a loud, colorful, messy transition piece. It’s the bridge between the "Grindhouse Troma" of the early 80s and the "Self-Aware Meta Troma" of the 90s and 2000s.
The practical effects remain a highlight. In an era where everything is CGI, seeing a man-sized monster made of foam and latex throwing stuntmen through paper walls is refreshing. There is a tactile reality to it. You can almost smell the chemicals and the sweat.
The film also serves as a time capsule of 1980s Japan. Seeing the streets of Tokyo before the bubble burst, mixed with the aesthetic of a New York indie film, creates a visual style that is genuinely unique. It’s ugly and beautiful at the same time.
Navigating the Versions
If you’re trying to watch this today, be careful which version you grab. There are various cuts floating around. The unrated director’s cut is the only way to go if you want the full experience. Some TV edits and older VHS releases hacked out the best practical effects, leaving the movie feeling gutted and confusing.
What You Should Do Next
If you’re planning a rewatch or diving into the Troma-verse for the first time, don't just stop at the movie itself. To really understand why The Toxic Avenger Part II exists in this weird, bloated form, you need to look at the context of the era.
👉 See also: Why Right Said Fred Still Matters: What Most People Get Wrong
- Watch the "All the Love You Can Get" Documentary: It gives a massive amount of insight into how Lloyd Kaufman runs the studio and the chaos of the Tokyo shoot.
- Compare the Suit: Look at the 1984 suit versus the 1989 suit. It tells you everything you need to know about the franchise's shift toward a more "marketable" monster.
- Check out the soundtrack: The music in Part II is surprisingly catchy and fits that late-80s "extreme" aesthetic perfectly.
The legacy of the sequel isn't that it's a "perfect" movie. It's not. It’s a fascinating example of what happens when an independent studio gets a little bit of money, a lot of ambition, and no one to tell them "no." It’s the ultimate "more is more" sequel. If you can handle the tonal whiplash and the sheer volume of the performance, it's a ride worth taking.
Instead of looking for a tight narrative, appreciate it for the DIY madness it is. It paved the way for the bigger, weirder projects like Citizen Toxie years later. Without the messy success of the Japan trip, Troma might have just stayed a small Jersey outfit. Instead, they went global.