Norman Bowker drove around a lake. He did it for hours. Seven miles per circuit, twelve times around, watching the sunset reflect off the water in his quiet Iowa hometown. He wasn't just driving; he was stuck. If you've ever read Tim O'Brien’s masterpiece, you know that The Things They Carried Speaking of Courage is arguably the most heartbreaking chapter in the entire book. It’s the one that punches you in the gut because it isn't about the heat of battle. It’s about the silence that follows.
Most people think of courage as a frantic, heroic moment. We imagine a soldier charging a machine-gun nest or pulling a comrade from a burning vehicle. But O'Brien flips the script here. He shows us a man who almost won the Silver Star, a man who almost saved his friend Kiowa from a "shit field" during a mortar attack, but who ultimately let go.
It’s messy. It’s honest. Honestly, it’s a bit devastating to realize that Bowker’s biggest burden wasn't the weight of his rucksack—it was the weight of a medal he didn’t win.
The Physical and Emotional Weight of the Song Tra Bong
The setting of this specific story matters more than most readers realize. We are in the "shit field." That’s not a metaphor, by the way. The platoon was camped in a literal sewage field near the Song Tra Bong river during the monsoon season. It’s disgusting. It’s visceral. The rain is constant, the ground is bubbling, and the smell is an entity of its own.
When the mortars hit, the field literally boils. Kiowa, perhaps the most likeable character in the book, starts sinking. He's being sucked down into the muck.
Bowker is there. He has Kiowa by the boot. He’s pulling. He’s trying. But the smell—that overwhelming, wretched stench of human waste and swamp water—is too much. Bowker lets go. He survives, and Kiowa is swallowed by the earth.
Later, back in Iowa, Bowker can’t stop thinking about that smell. He tells himself that if the smell hadn't been so bad, he would have been brave. He would have won the Silver Star. This is the central conflict of The Things They Carried Speaking of Courage: the distinction between the courage we want to have and the physical reality of our limitations.
📖 Related: Colin Macrae Below Deck: Why the Fan-Favorite Engineer Finally Walked Away
Why Norman Bowker Can't Talk to His Father
You've probably noticed that Bowker spends the whole chapter imagining a conversation with his dad. His father is a man of few words, a veteran himself, someone who values medals and tangible proof of valor.
Bowker circles that lake in his father's Chevy, rehearsing a speech he will never give. He wants to tell his dad about the Silver Star he almost won. He wants to explain that "almost" is a very lonely place to live.
- He passes the houses of people he used to know.
- He sees Sally Kramer, his old high school girlfriend, now married.
- He looks at the town's wealth and peace and feels like a ghost.
The disconnect is total. To the people in town, the war is a news segment. To Bowker, the war is the lake. He imagines his father saying, "Seven medals is plenty," but in his heart, Bowker knows his father is disappointed. Or maybe he just thinks his father is disappointed. That’s the tragedy of the veteran's return—the wall of silence built out of a fear that civilians simply won’t get it. They can't smell the Song Tra Bong.
The Meta-Fiction: Did It Actually Happen?
Here is where O'Brien gets tricky. If you’re looking for a straight history, you’re reading the wrong book. O'Brien famously distinguishes between "story-truth" and "happening-truth."
He tells us later that he wrote "Speaking of Courage" at the suggestion of the real Norman Bowker. Bowker sent him a long, rambling seventeen-page letter years after the war, explaining how he couldn't find a place for himself in the world. He worked short-term jobs—janitor, car wash attendant, fast-food cook—but nothing stuck. He told O'Brien, "Tell my story."
So, O'Brien wrote it. But he changed things. In the original version, he put it in his own voice. He left out the shit field.
👉 See also: Cómo salvar a tu favorito: La verdad sobre la votación de La Casa de los Famosos Colombia
Bowker hated the first draft. He said it lacked the "truth."
Tragically, shortly after the story was published in its revised form, Norman Bowker hanged himself in a YMCA locker room. He didn't leave a note. He just ran out of road. This reality casts a long shadow over The Things They Carried Speaking of Courage. It reminds us that for some, the war never ends; it just changes locations.
The Symbolism of the Lake
The lake in the story is a perfect mirror of the field in Vietnam. The field was a "void" that sucked Kiowa down. The lake is a "void" that Bowker circles, unable to find an entry point back into society.
It’s a seven-mile loop. It’s repetitive. It’s stagnant.
Just like his trauma, the lake has no current. It doesn't go anywhere. Bowker is stuck in a loop of "what ifs."
- What if I hadn't let go of the boot?
- What if the mortars hadn't hit that specific spot?
- What if I was as brave as I thought I was?
The lake represents the suburban trap. It’s beautiful on the surface, but underneath, there’s a lot of mud.
✨ Don't miss: Cliff Richard and The Young Ones: The Weirdest Bromance in TV History Explained
Actionable Insights for Understanding the Narrative
If you are studying this text for a class or just trying to wrap your head around why it’s so famous, focus on these specific elements to unlock the meaning:
1. Watch the Clock
The story is structured around the passing of time on a single day: the Fourth of July. The irony is thick. While the town celebrates national independence and "courage" with fireworks, Bowker is imprisoned by his own memory. Notice how the light changes in the story. As it gets darker, Bowker's thoughts get darker.
2. Focus on the Senses
O'Brien doesn't focus on the sound of the guns as much as the smell of the field. This is a common trait in PTSD narratives. Trauma is often sensory, not just intellectual. If you want to understand Bowker’s failure, you have to understand the physical revulsion he felt. It wasn't cowardice in the traditional sense; it was a biological rejection of the horror.
3. The Role of the Father
Analyze the "imaginary" dialogue. Bowker never actually speaks to his father in the story. This suggests that the pressure of "masculine courage" is often an internal dialogue rather than an external one. We perform for people who aren't even asking us to perform.
4. Compare "Speaking of Courage" to "Notes"
You cannot fully understand this chapter without reading the chapter that follows it, "Notes." In "Notes," O'Brien explains the "happening-truth" behind the fiction. It’s where the mask slips. It shows how writing is a way of "speaking" for those who have lost their voices.
Ultimately, The Things They Carried Speaking of Courage serves as a bridge. It connects the literal battlefield of Vietnam to the psychological battlefield of the American Midwest. It teaches us that courage isn't a permanent trait you either have or don't have. It's a flickering thing. It depends on the weather, the smell, and the weight of the boots you're trying to hold onto.
To really grasp the depth of this work, look into the real-life correspondence between Tim O'Brien and the veterans he served with. The tension between wanting to tell the truth and needing to tell a "good story" is what makes this literature stay with you long after you've closed the book. It’s not just a war story. It’s a story about the difficulty of being a person in a world that demands heroes.
Read the text again. This time, don't look for the hero. Look for the man in the Chevy, circling the water, waiting for someone to ask him how the day was. That's where the real story lives.