Charles Dickens was basically the king of the "cliffhanger" before Netflix made it a personality trait. When he was churning out weekly installments of A Tale of Two Cities for his magazine All the Year Round back in 1859, he wasn't just trying to write a textbook about the French Revolution. He was trying to keep people buying magazines. Because of that, the Tale of Two Cities characters aren't just dry historical figures; they are archetypes, messes, and occasionally, absolute nightmares.
You've probably heard the "best of times, worst of times" bit. It’s iconic. But honestly, the real meat of the story is in how Dickens uses these people to represent the sheer terror of a world spinning out of control. It’s about the double. The shadow. The guy who looks like you but is actually better—or way worse.
Why Sydney Carton Isn't Just a "Sad Drunk"
Sydney Carton is the heart of the book. Let’s be real. If you’re looking at Tale of Two Cities characters and you don't start with Carton, you're missing the point. Most people write him off as a depressed alcoholic who happens to look like Charles Darnay. That’s a massive oversimplification.
Carton is the "Id" of the story. He’s brilliant but self-loathing. He calls himself a "disappointed drudge." He’s the guy at the back of the bar who could have been anything but chose to be nothing. Dickens describes him as "the cloud of caring for nothing, which enveloped him with a separate atmosphere." That’s heavy stuff for the 1850s.
The nuance here is his relationship with Stryver. Stryver is the "Lion," the guy who takes all the credit, while Carton is the "Jackal," doing all the actual intellectual heavy lifting in the dark. It’s a toxic workplace dynamic before we had a word for it. When Carton finally steps up at the end, it’s not just a random act of kindness. It’s his only way to "win" at a life he felt he’d already lost. He isn't just saving Darnay; he’s replacing him. It's a weird, beautiful, slightly creepy obsession with Lucie Manette that drives him to the guillotine. It works because it’s desperate.
The Problem With Charles Darnay
Then there’s Charles Darnay. Honestly? He’s kinda boring.
Darnay is the "straight man." He represents the virtuous aristocrat who wants to do the right thing by renouncing his title. But in the ecosystem of Tale of Two Cities characters, he’s mostly there to be a catalyst. He is the person things happen to. He gets arrested. He gets saved. He gets arrested again. He gets saved by a guy who looks like him.
Dickens needed Darnay to be perfect so we would feel bad for him, but it makes him the least relatable person in the room. He’s an Evrémonde by blood, and that bloodline is cursed. The real tension isn't whether Darnay is a good guy—he is—it's whether he can ever truly escape the sins of his father and uncle. The French Revolution says "no." Dickens, being a bit of a Victorian moralist, says "maybe, if someone else dies for you."
Madame Defarge and the Terrifying Reality of Revenge
If you want to talk about a character who sticks with you, it’s Thérèse Defarge. She’s not just a villain. She is the embodiment of the "Reign of Terror."
You know the knitting? It’s not a hobby. It’s a death list. She is literally knitting the names of the people she wants to see decapitated into a secret code. This is where Dickens gets dark. Madame Defarge is a survivor of horrific systemic abuse. The Evrémonde family (Darnay’s relatives) basically destroyed her entire family. Her sister was raped, her brother was killed, her father died of grief.
She isn't just "mean." She is traumatized.
But here’s the thing: Dickens uses her to show how revolution can turn into the very thing it’s fighting. She becomes a monster. By the end, she doesn't even care about justice anymore; she just wants blood. Her final confrontation with Miss Pross is one of the most intense scenes in literature. It’s "Love vs. Hate" in a literal room-wrecking brawl. And spoilers: love wins, but it goes deaf in the process.
The Supporting Cast: More Than Just Background Noise
We can't ignore the people who actually keep the plot moving.
- Dr. Alexandre Manette: The guy spent 18 years in the Bastille. He’s the psychological core of the book. His "relapses" where he starts making shoes again are some of the earliest and most accurate depictions of PTSD in fiction. He’s obsessed with his workbench because it was the only thing that kept him sane in the dark.
- Lucie Manette: She’s the "Golden Thread." She ties everyone together. Modern readers often find her a bit flat—she faints a lot—but in the context of the story, she’s the light everyone else is trying to get to.
- Jarvis Lorry: A man of "business." He’s the loyal clerk from Tellson’s Bank. Lorry is great because he pretends he has no feelings, but he’s basically everyone’s dad. He represents the bridge between the two cities (London and Paris).
- Jerry Cruncher: The comic relief with a side of grave-robbing. He calls it "honest tradesman" work, but he’s literally digging up bodies to sell to scientists. It’s gross, it’s weird, and it’s very Dickens.
The "Double" Motif You Might Have Missed
Dickens was obsessed with doubles. It’s everywhere in the Tale of Two Cities characters.
Obviously, there’s Carton and Darnay. They look alike. One is the "good" version (Darnay), and one is the "bad" version (Carton). But look deeper. You have Lucie Manette (the angel) versus Madame Defarge (the demon). You have London (the "stable" city) versus Paris (the "chaotic" city).
Even the way the characters interact is mirrored. Dr. Manette was "recalled to life" at the start of the book by being released from prison. Sydney Carton is "recalled to life" at the end by finding a purpose in his sacrifice. It’s symmetrical. It’s poetic. It’s also incredibly depressing if you think about it too long.
🔗 Read more: The Cast of Daddy Long Legs: Why the 1955 Film Still Feels Magical
Real Talk: Why Does This Matter in 2026?
You might think a book about 1789 written in 1859 is irrelevant. It’s not.
The way Dickens writes about the "mobs" in Paris is eerily similar to how people behave on social media today. The dehumanization of the "other." The way Madame Defarge can't see Darnay as a person, only as a symbol of his family’s crimes. That’s a very modern problem.
We see this play out in how we treat people. We see the "knitting" happening in comment sections. Dickens was warning us that when you seek justice through pure vengeance, you lose your humanity. He used these Tale of Two Cities characters to show that the only way out of the cycle is through individual sacrifice and empathy—basically, being more like Carton and less like the mob.
The Misconception of the "Guillotine"
People often think the book is a pro-revolution or anti-revolution manifesto. It’s neither. Dickens hated the French aristocracy (they were genuinely terrible), but he was also terrified of the "Jacques"—the nameless revolutionaries who took over.
He uses characters like The Vengeance (Madame Defarge’s sidekick) to show how bloodlust becomes an addiction. The guillotine itself becomes a character. They call it "Sainte Guillotine." They joke about it. It’s a dark, twisted cult of death that eventually eats its own.
Actionable Insights for Your Next Read (or Essay)
If you're diving back into this classic or trying to understand the Tale of Two Cities characters for a project, keep these three things in mind:
🔗 Read more: When Is Metallica’s Next Tour? Why M72 2026 Is Actually Happening
- Watch the shadows. Every time a character is in a dark room or near a shadow, pay attention. Dickens uses light to signal moral clarity and darkness to signal internal struggle.
- Track the "Business" vs. "Family" divide. Characters like Jarvis Lorry start out claiming they are just "machines of business," but they always end up acting out of love. Dickens is arguing that you can't actually separate the two.
- Look for the echoes. Phrases like "Recalled to Life" or "buried alive" show up constantly. Whenever a character says them, it’s a hint that their status is about to change—either they are coming back from a dark place or falling into one.
The real power of these characters isn't that they are "realistic" in a modern sense. They are vivid, exaggerated, and deeply symbolic. They represent the best and worst of what happens when society breaks down. Whether you’re a fan of Sydney Carton’s tragic end or you’re fascinated by Madame Defarge’s relentless drive, there is a reason we are still talking about them over 160 years later.
To truly master the nuances of the text, compare the internal monologues of Sydney Carton with the letters written by the Marquis St. Evrémonde. You’ll see the stark contrast between a man who has lost everything but found his soul, and a man who has everything but has lost his humanity.
Next Steps:
- Re-read the final chapter focusing specifically on Carton's internal prophecy.
- Cross-reference the "Evrémonde" backstory with the real-life historical grievances of the French peasantry to see how Dickens grounded his fiction in fact.
- Analyze the character of Miss Pross as a symbol of British stoicism in contrast to the French revolutionary fervor.