You've probably heard the term tossed around on cable news for years now. People call it the Russian dossier, others call it the Steele dossier, and some just call it a hoax. It’s messy. It’s complicated. Honestly, it changed the way we look at political intelligence forever.
At its core, the document was a collection of field notes. Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer who used to run the MI6 Russia desk, compiled it. He wasn't just some guy with a laptop; he had real-world experience in Moscow. But that doesn't mean everything in the papers was gospel. Far from it.
The Russian dossier consists of 17 memos. They allege a massive conspiracy between Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Kremlin. Some of it was about "kompromat"—the Russian word for compromising material—and some of it was about business deals.
Where the Russian Dossier Actually Came From
It wasn't a government project. Not at first.
Originally, a conservative website called The Washington Free Beacon hired a research firm named Fusion GPS to look into Trump during the Republican primaries. When Trump won the nomination, the GOP money dried up. That’s when the Democrats stepped in. The Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm Perkins Coie, started picking up the tab.
Fusion GPS then hired Steele.
He didn't go to Russia himself. That would have been suicide for a former MI6 agent. Instead, he used intermediaries to talk to sources deep inside the Russian government. Or so he thought. This is where things get murky. You've got to understand that in the world of high-stakes spying, "raw intelligence" is just that—raw. It’s unverified rumors, whispers in bars, and second-hand accounts that haven't been vetted yet.
The Buzzfeed Moment
For months, the Russian dossier was the ultimate "open secret" in Washington. Journalists at the New York Times, CNN, and Yahoo News all had copies. They wouldn't publish it. Why? Because they couldn't prove the wilder claims.
Then came January 2017.
CNN reported that intelligence officials had briefed both Obama and Trump about the existence of the memos. Once the news was out that the "intelligence community" was taking it seriously, Buzzfeed News decided to dump the whole thing online.
📖 Related: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
The internet exploded.
What Was Actually in Those Memos?
If you read the 35 pages, it plays out like a spy novel. Some parts are boring business talk. Other parts are "incendiary."
The most famous—or infamous—allegation involved a hotel room in Moscow. It’s the "pee tape" rumor. Steele’s sources claimed that the FSB (the successor to the KGB) had video of Trump with prostitutes to use as blackmail. Trump has always vehemently denied this. No proof has ever surfaced. Not a single frame of video.
Then there was Michael Cohen.
The Russian dossier claimed Trump’s then-lawyer went to Prague to meet with Russian officials. Cohen showed his passport. It didn't have a Czech stamp. The Mueller Report later found no evidence Cohen was ever in Prague. This was a major blow to the document’s credibility.
- The Carter Page Angle: The dossier claimed Page, a campaign advisor, met with high-level Russians to discuss lifting sanctions.
- The Manafort Connection: It alleged Paul Manafort managed the "conspiracy of cooperation."
- Cyber Warfare: It suggested the DNC hack was a joint venture.
Some parts were eerily accurate, though. It predicted that the Russians were dumping emails to help Trump months before the full scale of the operation was public knowledge.
The FBI and the FISA Mess
This is where the Russian dossier becomes a legal nightmare.
The FBI used the dossier to help get a warrant to wiretap Carter Page. They didn't tell the FISA court that the research was funded by the Clinton campaign. They also didn't mention that their primary sub-source, a guy named Igor Danchenko, had told the FBI that Steele’s report overstated what he’d actually said.
Inspector General Michael Horowitz eventually released a report that was pretty damning. He found 17 "significant errors or omissions" in the FBI’s warrant applications.
👉 See also: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
It wasn't a "deep state" conspiracy to some; it was just bad, lazy police work. To others, it was a hit job. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. The FBI was terrified of a Russian mole and jumped the gun on unverified info.
Why the Russian Dossier Still Matters Today
You can't talk about modern politics without it.
It birthed the Mueller Investigation. While Robert Mueller eventually stated he couldn't find a criminal conspiracy between the campaign and Russia, his report detailed dozens of contacts that were, frankly, very strange.
The dossier also created a blueprint for how "opposition research" can be laundered through news outlets and government agencies. It changed the stakes.
The Fallout for Christopher Steele
Steele went from being a respected spook to a pariah in some circles and a hero in others. He stands by his work. Sorta. He’s admitted that the memos were never meant to be a final product. They were "lead sheets."
In 2021, the whole thing took another hit. The Department of Justice charged Danchenko with lying to the FBI. While Danchenko was eventually acquitted, the trial revealed just how thin the sourcing was. One of the main sources for the most salacious claims was allegedly a long-time Democratic operative named Charles Dolan.
Think about that. A document about Russian interference might have been fed info by a US political strategist. It’s a hall of mirrors.
Sorting Fact from Fiction
If you want to understand the Russian dossier, you have to look at what was debunked versus what stayed "possible."
- The Prague Trip: Almost certainly false.
- The "Pee Tape": Zero evidence. Likely Russian disinformation fed to Steele.
- The DNC Hack: Steele was right that Russia was behind it, but his details on "how" were messy.
- The Alfa Bank Server: The dossier claimed there was a secret back-channel via a server. The FBI looked. They found nothing.
It’s easy to say "the whole thing was a lie." But it's more accurate to say it was a mix of real alarm bells and fake noise. The Russians are masters of "dezinformatsiya." If they knew Steele was sniffing around, they likely fed his sources "trash" to discredit the whole investigation.
✨ Don't miss: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
And it worked.
Moving Forward: Actionable Insights on Political Info
Don't get burned by the next "bombshell" report. Whether it’s a Russian dossier or a leaked laptop, the rules of engagement for a smart citizen remain the same.
Check the funding. Follow the money. If a report is paid for by a political opponent, treat every word with extreme skepticism. It doesn't mean it's false, but it means it has a goal.
Distinguish between raw and vetted intel. The biggest mistake the public made in 2017 was treating "field notes" like a finished FBI report. If a document says "Source A claims," that is a rumor, not a fact.
Look for corroboration. One source is no source. If the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal can't find a second person to confirm a story, there is usually a reason.
Watch the retractions. In the 24-hour news cycle, the "correction" usually happens on page A12 three weeks later. Keep a mental tally of which pundits were certain about the dossier's claims and see if they ever admitted they were wrong.
The Russian dossier isn't just a piece of paper anymore. It’s a symbol of the trust gap in America. Understanding that it was a mix of private political research, raw human intelligence, and potential foreign disinformation is the only way to make sense of the last decade of news.
Stay skeptical. Verify everything. Don't let a catchy headline replace a deep look at the evidence.
Next Steps for Deep Research
- Read the unclassified version of the IG Horowitz Report (December 2019) to see exactly how the FBI handled the document.
- Compare the Mueller Report’s findings on specific individuals (like Carter Page and Paul Manafort) against the specific claims made in the Steele memos.
- Investigate the Durham Report, which provides the most recent legal perspective on the origins of the investigation and the dossier’s role in it.