It happened fast. One minute you're scrolling through your feed, and the next, your uncle is texting you a blurry clip that supposedly shows a woman eating a cat video. Or at least, that's how the rumor mill started churning during the 2024 election cycle. It was chaotic. People were screaming on X (formerly Twitter), Facebook groups were melting down, and suddenly, a specific neighborhood in Ohio was the center of a global firestorm.
Truth is usually boring, but the lies? They're electric.
The story didn't just appear out of thin air. It was a perfect storm of a local police report, a completely different city, and a high-stakes presidential debate that turned a tragic mental health crisis into a political battering ram. If you saw the woman eating cat video or heard the claims about Springfield, Ohio, you were likely looking at two different events smashed together by people who didn't bother to check a map.
The Allexis Telia Ferrell Case: Not Springfield
Let's get the facts straight because the internet definitely didn't. Most of the "evidence" people pointed to—including bodycam footage of a woman being arrested on a driveway—didn't even happen in Springfield. It happened in Canton, Ohio.
On August 23, 2024, Canton police arrested a 27-year-old woman named Allexis Telia Ferrell. According to the police report and local news outlets like The Canton Repository, Ferrell was accused of killing and eating a cat in front of horrified neighbors. It was a gruesome, heartbreaking incident that clearly involved a severe mental health episode.
But here is the kicker: Canton is over 170 miles away from Springfield.
📖 Related: Is there a bank holiday today? Why your local branch might be closed on January 12
When the rumors started flying about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, bad actors took the Canton bodycam footage and slapped a "Springfield" label on it. It worked. Millions of people saw that woman eating cat video and assumed it was proof of the claims being made about the Haitian community. It wasn't. Ferrell is a U.S. citizen and has lived in Canton for years. She had no connection to the immigrant community in Springfield. None.
How a Local Facebook Post Went Nuclear
Springfield was already on edge. The city had seen a massive influx of Haitian immigrants over a few years—somewhere between 12,000 and 15,000 people. That's a lot for a town of 60,000. Resources were stretched. People were frustrated about traffic, wait times at clinics, and rising rents.
Then came the "cat" post.
It started in a local Facebook group called "Springfield Ohio Crime and Information." A resident posted a story claiming her neighbor’s daughter’s friend had lost a cat and found it hanging from a branch at a neighbor's house, supposedly to be eaten.
Notice the "friend of a friend" thing? That’s classic urban legend territory.
👉 See also: Is Pope Leo Homophobic? What Most People Get Wrong
Newsweek and NBC News eventually tracked down the original poster, Erika Lee. She later admitted she had no first-hand knowledge of the event. She was just repeating a rumor she’d heard. She actually expressed deep regret later, saying she didn't mean to start a national crisis. But once that post was screenshotted and sent to the big accounts on X, the "woman eating cat video" narrative became unstoppable.
The Debate Stage and the Aftermath
By the time the presidential debate rolled around in September 2024, the rumor had reached the highest levels of government. When the claim was made on national television that people were "eating the pets," the internet exploded.
Springfield City Manager Bryan Heck and Mayor Rob Rue had to spend weeks repeating the same thing: There are no credible reports of pets being harmed by the immigrant community.
The local police department was swamped. They checked the calls. They checked the reports. Nothing matched the viral claims. What they did find were bomb threats. Dozens of them. Schools had to be evacuated. State troopers had to be stationed at elementary schools. The city hall was cleared out. All because a tragedy in Canton was mislabeled and a Facebook rumor went viral.
Why Our Brains Believe This Stuff
Psychologically, we are wired to pay attention to "high-arousal" content. Seeing a headline about a woman eating cat video triggers a "disgust response." Evolutionarily, disgust keeps us safe from poison and disease. Online, disgust keeps us clicking.
✨ Don't miss: How to Reach Donald Trump: What Most People Get Wrong
When you add a "threat" to our pets—who we view as family—our logical brain shuts off. We stop asking "Is this Canton or Springfield?" and start hitting the share button.
Sorting Fact from Viral Fiction
If you're trying to figure out what's real, you have to look at the sourcing.
- The Bodycam Footage: Real footage, but it's Allexis Ferrell in Canton, Ohio. She is a lifelong resident, not an immigrant.
- The Goose Photo: There was a photo of a man carrying a dead goose. That was taken in Columbus, Ohio, and it turned out the geese were roadkill he was clearing. Again, not Springfield.
- The Police Logs: Springfield PD has gone on record multiple times stating there are zero documented cases of Haitian immigrants stealing or eating pets.
It's a mess. Honestly, it’s a masterclass in how easy it is to manipulate public perception with just one decontextualized video and a few loud voices.
What You Can Do Now
Don't let the algorithm jerk you around. When a video like the woman eating cat video pops up, the first thing you should do is check the location. Not the location the caption claims, but the actual police department mentioned in the report.
If you see someone sharing the debunked Springfield claims, point them toward the official statements from the Springfield Police Department. They’ve been incredibly transparent about the lack of evidence.
Understand that viral "outrage" content is usually stripped of its context to make you feel a specific emotion. In this case, a woman’s mental health crisis in one city was used to vilify an entire community in another.
Next time you see a shocking video, take ten seconds to search the person's name and the city. Usually, the real story is much more complicated—and a lot sadder—than a 30-second viral clip suggests. Verify the source, check the date, and always look for the original police report before hitting share.