You’ve seen it. Even if you aren't an "art person," you know the guy. He’s wearing a dark overcoat, a slightly too-stiff bowler hat, and his face is almost entirely obliterated by a floating green apple. It’s the Son of Man Magritte painted back in 1964, and it has become one of those images that just won’t leave the collective consciousness alone.
René Magritte didn't just paint a man. He painted a riddle.
A lot of people think surrealism is just about being "weird" for the sake of it, like a dream you can't quite explain after a third cup of coffee. But Magritte was different. He was precise. He was a Belgian man who lived a remarkably quiet, almost boring life, yet he spent his days dismantling how we perceive reality. Honestly, the most interesting thing about the Son of Man is that it started as a self-portrait. Magritte was asked to paint himself, and his response was basically to hide his face behind a piece of fruit.
The Mystery of the Bowler Hat and the Hovering Fruit
Why an apple? Why not a pear? Or a brick?
Magritte had this obsession with the "visible that is hidden." It’s a concept that sounds fancy but is actually pretty simple. When you look at the Son of Man Magritte, your brain immediately wants to see the face. You know it’s there. You can see the edges of the man’s eyes peeking out from behind the leaves of the Granny Smith. But the apple is in the way. It’s frustrating. It’s supposed to be.
Magritte once said that everything we see hides another thing. We always want to see what is hidden by what we see. It’s a conflict between the visible which is hidden and the visible which is present.
Think about that for a second.
The painting is a literal representation of that feeling you get when you’re talking to someone and you feel like they’re holding something back. Or when you look at a beautiful building and wonder what’s happening in the basement. It’s about the human desire to peek behind the curtain. The bowler hat itself was a sort of uniform for the middle class in Magritte's time. By putting a "common man" in such a bizarre situation, he’s suggesting that there is mystery even in the most mundane, corporate, "boring" parts of life.
👉 See also: Why the Man Black Hair Blue Eyes Combo is So Rare (and the Genetics Behind It)
The Left Arm is Just... Wrong
If you look closely at the painting—I mean really look—you’ll notice something unsettling about the man’s left arm.
It looks like it’s bending backward. The elbow is facing the wrong way.
Most casual viewers miss this because they’re so focused on the apple. This wasn’t a mistake. Magritte was a master of technique; he knew how to paint an arm. By making the anatomy slightly "off," he creates a sense of unease that you can’t quite put your finger on. It’s the "uncanny valley" before that was even a term. The wall behind the man is low, looking out over a sea that feels cold and flat. The sky is grey and heavy. Everything about the composition is designed to make the viewer feel a bit isolated.
Where is the Original Son of Man Magritte Today?
This is the part that surprises people. You can't just walk into the Louvre or the MoMA and see this painting.
It’s in a private collection.
Because it’s privately owned, it rarely goes on public display. This has only added to the mythos. While other Magritte works like The Treachery of Images (the "This is not a pipe" one) are easily accessible in major galleries, the Son of Man Magritte is a bit of a ghost. The last time it was seen in a major public exhibition was arguably in Montreal back in 1970, though it has made very brief, rare appearances in specialized shows since then.
- Artist: René Magritte
- Year: 1964
- Medium: Oil on canvas
- Ownership: Private Collection
The fact that it's hidden from the public eye mirrors the theme of the painting itself. The "hidden visible." It’s out there, someone owns it, they look at it in their living room or a private vault, but for the rest of us, it only exists as a digital ghost or a poster in a college dorm.
✨ Don't miss: Chuck E. Cheese in Boca Raton: Why This Location Still Wins Over Parents
Pop Culture’s Obsession with the Apple
You’ve seen the references. They’re everywhere.
Remember the 1999 remake of The Thomas Crown Affair? Pierce Brosnan uses a fleet of men dressed as the Son of Man to confuse the police during a museum heist. It’s a brilliant use of the imagery because the painting is about anonymity and being "just another guy in a hat."
Then there’s Michael Jackson's "Scream" music video. Or The Simpsons. Or Stranger Things. Even the Apple logo—though Steve Jobs claimed it was a tribute to Alan Turing—has been linked by many art historians to Magritte’s recurring use of the fruit. Magritte made the green apple a symbol of the modern world’s weirdness.
Why the Title "Son of Man"?
The title is heavy. It’s a biblical reference, usually used to describe Jesus. But Magritte wasn't a particularly religious man in the traditional sense. By calling a guy in a suit "The Son of Man," he’s making a statement about humanity in the 20th century.
Is the man a savior? Or is he just a person struggling with the weight of existence?
Some critics argue that the "Son of Man" refers to the temptation in the Garden of Eden. The apple is right there, blocking his vision, much like the original sin supposedly blocked humanity’s direct connection to the divine. Others think Magritte was just being cheeky. He often had his friends come up with titles for his paintings after they were finished. He liked titles that didn't explain the painting but added another layer of confusion to it.
Modern Interpretations and E-E-A-T
When we look at the work of experts like David Sylvester, who wrote the definitive catalogue raisonné for Magritte, we see that the Son of Man Magritte is often grouped with other "hat" paintings. Magritte used the bowler hat man as a sort of avatar.
🔗 Read more: The Betta Fish in Vase with Plant Setup: Why Your Fish Is Probably Miserable
In a world where everyone is trying to be "unique," Magritte’s man is aggressively average. He is the Everyman.
The struggle to see the face is the struggle to know someone’s true identity in a world of suits and social expectations. It’s a theme that resonates even more today in the age of social media. We all present a "visible" front—a curated Instagram feed, a professional LinkedIn headshot—that hides the "real" us behind the metaphorical apple.
Actionable Insights for Art Lovers
If you're fascinated by this piece, don't just stop at the poster. Surrealism is a rabbit hole worth falling down.
First, look up Magritte's other "apple" works. He did a painting called The Hesitation Waltz which features two masked apples. It’s weird and wonderful. Second, if you want to see his work in person, the Magritte Museum in Brussels is the place to go. While they don't have the Son of Man, they have the largest collection of his drawings, oils, and personal artifacts.
Understand the lighting. Magritte used a very flat, even light. It makes everything look "real" but "fake" at the same time. This is a great technique to study if you’re into photography or digital art. By keeping the shadows minimal, the surreal elements (like the floating apple) feel more grounded in reality.
To truly appreciate the Son of Man Magritte, try this: next time you’re in a crowded place, look at the people around you and imagine an object covering their faces. A phone. A coffee cup. A book. You’ll realize how much we rely on facial recognition to feel comfortable. Magritte takes that comfort away, and that’s why, over 60 years later, we still can’t look away.
How to Engage Further with Surrealism
- Visit the Menil Collection in Houston: They have an incredible amount of Magritte's work if you're in the United States.
- Read "Magritte: A Life" by Alex Danchev: It’s a chunky biography, but it’s the best way to understand the man behind the bowler hat.
- Experiment with your own photography: Try the "hidden visible" concept. Take a portrait where a common object obscures the subject's face. Notice how it changes the mood of the photo from a simple portrait to a story.
Magritte didn't want you to "solve" his paintings. He wanted you to experience the mystery. The apple isn't a puzzle to be solved; it's a barrier to be acknowledged. Once you stop trying to see the face, you start seeing the painting for what it really is: a masterpiece of the uncomfortable.