It was 1962. Hollywood was obsessed with the Bible. You had Ben-Hur winning everything, and every studio head in town wanted their own slice of the "Sand and Sandals" pie. But the 1962 film Sodom and Gomorrah—sometimes called The Last Days of Sodom and Gomorrah—is a weird one. Honestly, it’s a bit of a miracle the thing ever got finished. It wasn't just another stiff Sunday school lesson. It was a sprawling, messy, $6 million co-production that nearly broke its director and featured a cast that looked like an international airport lounge.
Most people today remember the story from Genesis. Lot. The pillar of salt. The fire and brimstone. But the movie? It’s a fascinating relic of a time when directors thought they could out-do the Bible with sheer scale. Robert Aldrich, the guy who did The Dirty Dozen and What Ever Happened to Baby Jane?, was at the helm. Imagine that. A guy known for gritty, cynical, high-tension dramas trying to navigate a desert epic with thousands of extras and a script that had to pass the censors of the early sixties. It didn't go smoothly.
The Chaos Behind the Scenes in Morocco
They filmed in Morocco. It was hot. It was exhausting. Sergio Leone—the legend who basically invented the Spaghetti Western—was the second unit director. Some film historians argue he actually directed quite a bit of the action, which explains why certain battle scenes have a distinct, visceral energy that feels different from the talky melodrama in the cities.
Stewart Granger played Lot. He was a massive star back then, known for being a bit of a "man's man" on screen, but he reportedly clashed with Aldrich constantly. You’ve got to understand the ego involved here. Granger wanted to be the hero; Aldrich wanted to make a movie about moral decay. The result is this strange tension where the movie feels like it’s pulling in two directions at once. One half wants to be a gritty political thriller about salt rights (yes, salt is a huge plot point), and the other half wants to be a technicolor fever dream.
The production was plagued by logistics. Thousands of members of the Moroccan army were used as extras for the big battle between the Hebrews and the Helamites. But you can't just give soldiers wooden swords and expect them to look like ancient warriors without some hiccups. There are stories of the heat being so intense that the film stock itself was at risk. It’s the kind of production that doesn't happen anymore because now we just use CGI. In 1962, if you wanted 2,000 guys on horses, you had to find 2,000 guys who could actually ride horses.
📖 Related: The A Wrinkle in Time Cast: Why This Massive Star Power Didn't Save the Movie
Why the Sodom and Gomorrah Film Still Matters
Is it a masterpiece? Probably not. Is it fascinating? Absolutely.
The film Sodom and Gomorrah represents the tail end of the "Epic Era." Shortly after this, the public’s appetite for three-hour biblical stories began to wane. But look at the visuals. The costume designer, Giancarlo Bartolini Salimbeni, went all out. The city of Sodom looks like a decadent, velvet-draped nightmare. It’s meant to represent ultimate sin, but through a 1962 lens, it looks like a really high-end, slightly dangerous nightclub.
Pier Angeli played Ildith, Lot’s wife. Her performance is actually quite grounded compared to the scenery-chewing happening around her. The "pillar of salt" moment is the one everyone waits for. No spoilers, even though the book has been out for a few thousand years, but the way they handled the special effects for the destruction of the cities was actually pretty impressive for the time. They used miniatures, pyrotechnics, and some clever matte paintings that still hold a certain charm today. It has a physical weight that digital effects often lack.
The movie deals with themes that were actually pretty risky. Slavery. Torture. The corruption of power. It wasn't just about "sin" in a vague sense; it was about how a society eats itself from the inside out. Anouk Aimée plays Queen Bera, and she is delightfully cold. She treats the city like a chessboard, and everyone else is just a pawn. It’s a very cynical take on the biblical narrative, which is likely why it didn't land as well with the religious crowds as The Ten Commandments did.
👉 See also: Cuba Gooding Jr OJ: Why the Performance Everyone Hated Was Actually Genius
A Legacy of Excess and Salt
If you sit down to watch it now, you have to be patient. It’s long. It’s over two and a half hours. But there’s a sequence involving a dam being breached during a battle that is genuinely spectacular filmmaking.
The score by Miklós Rózsa is another reason to care. Rózsa was the king of the epic score—he did Ben-Hur and El Cid. His music for this film is sweeping and heavy, anchoring the drama when the dialogue gets a little too theatrical. It gives the whole thing a sense of "gravity" that the script sometimes loses.
Interestingly, the film was a massive hit in Italy and Europe but struggled a bit more in the States. Maybe it was too European in its sensibilities? Or maybe American audiences weren't ready for a Bible movie that felt so... sweaty and morally grey. It’s a film that exists in the shadow of giants, yet it has a cult following today among people who love "Euro-trash" cinema and high-budget historical spectacles.
- The Cast: Stewart Granger, Pier Angeli, Stanley Baker, and Anouk Aimée.
- The Music: A powerhouse score by Miklós Rózsa.
- The Visuals: Massive sets built in the Moroccan desert.
- The Direction: A weird mix of Robert Aldrich’s grit and Sergio Leone’s eye for scale.
Realism vs. Spectacle
One thing people often get wrong is assuming these movies were trying to be historically accurate. They weren't. They were trying to be cinematically accurate. The weapons are wrong, the clothes are stylized, and the geography is a bit "Hollywood." But that’s the point. The Sodom and Gomorrah film was designed to be a sensory experience. It was meant to be seen on a massive screen in a theater with air conditioning—a luxury in 1962.
✨ Don't miss: Greatest Rock and Roll Singers of All Time: Why the Legends Still Own the Mic
There's a specific scene where Lot leads his people across the desert, and the sheer number of animals and people involved is staggering. No green screen. No "copy-paste" crowds. Every person you see on that screen was a real human being standing in the sun. That kind of physical reality gives the movie a texture you can almost feel. You can see the dust on their faces. You can see the horses straining. It’s "tangible" cinema.
How to Watch It Today
Tracking down a high-quality version can be tricky. For years, it survived in grainy, panned-and-scanned TV edits that cut out half the frame. Since it was shot in a wide anamorphic format, losing half the screen ruins the composition. You really need to find the restored widescreen version to appreciate what Aldrich and his cinematographers (there were three of them!) were trying to do.
It’s often grouped with "Peplum" films—the Italian sword-and-sandal movies that were usually much cheaper. But this had a real budget. It’s like the "Prestige Peplum." It’s got the muscle men and the dancing girls, sure, but it also has a director who was genuinely interested in the psychology of a man trying to keep his family pure in a world that has completely lost its mind.
Actionable Insights for Film Buffs
If you're planning to dive into this era of cinema, don't just stop at the big names like Cleopatra. The "B-tier" epics often have more interesting creative choices because the directors weren't as strangled by studio "safety" protocols.
- Compare the styles: Watch the first hour (mostly Aldrich) and the battle scenes (likely Leone) and see if you can spot the difference in how the camera moves.
- Focus on the Salt: Notice how salt is treated as a currency and a source of power. It’s a clever way to ground a supernatural story in economics.
- Check the Score: Listen to how Miklós Rózsa uses different themes for the Hebrews versus the Sodomites. It’s a masterclass in leitmotif.
- Look for the Restored Version: Avoid any version that isn't in the original 1.85:1 or 2.35:1 aspect ratio. You’ll miss the scale of the Moroccan landscape.
The film Sodom and Gomorrah is a reminder of a time when movies were massive, risky, and physically grueling to make. It’s not perfect, but it’s a heck of a lot more interesting than most of the sanitized blockbusters we see today. It’s got grit, it’s got ego, and it’s got enough fire and brimstone to satisfy any fan of classic cinema. Give it a look if you want to see what happens when old-school Hollywood excess meets the harsh reality of the desert.