Everyone remembers the King Burger sketch. Anjelah Johnson, dressed in that iconic blue uniform, stares down a customer with a look that says "don't even try it." She delivers the line that became a cultural staple: "I'm a cut you." While the character Bon Qui Qui was meant to satirize the absolute worst in customer service, the "Security Security Bon Qui Qui" meme evolved into something else entirely within the professional tech world. It became a shorthand. A joke. A way to describe security systems that are all bark, no bite, and entirely focused on the wrong things.
But here is the thing about jokes. They usually highlight a painful truth.
In 2026, we are surrounded by high-tech "security security" measures that feel exactly like Bon Qui Qui at the counter. They are loud. They are aggressive. They are incredibly annoying to legitimate users. Yet, when an actual threat walks through the door, these systems are often looking the other way or, worse, inviting the threat in because they were too busy arguing with a "customer" over a complicated password requirement.
👉 See also: How Long Is My Phone? The Measurement Mistake You're Probably Making
The Illusion of the "Hard Shell"
Security is hard. It's really hard. Most companies approach it by building a massive digital wall. They invest millions in biometric scanners, multi-factor authentication (MFA) loops that never end, and firewalls that block 90% of productive work. This is the security security bon qui qui model of defense. It looks intimidating on paper, but it's fundamentally performative.
Think about the last time you tried to log into a corporate VPN. You probably had to enter a password, then a push notification, then maybe a hardware key code. If you messed up once? "Security! Security!" The system treats you like a criminal for forgetting a string of characters. Meanwhile, a sophisticated social engineer is busy calling your IT help desk, pretending to be a frantic executive who lost their phone, and getting a bypass code in thirty seconds.
The character of Bon Qui Qui succeeded because she focused on the rules of the menu, not the reality of the hunger. Modern cybersecurity does the same. We focus on the "menu" of compliance—ISO 27001, SOC2, GDPR—and forget that the goal isn't to follow a checklist. The goal is to stop the breach.
Why Technical Over-Correction Is Killing Us
When we talk about security security bon qui qui, we’re talking about friction. Friction is the enemy of actual safety.
Bruce Schneier, one of the most respected minds in the field, has argued for decades that security is a process, not a product. When the process becomes too heavy, humans find workarounds. If your "Security! Security!" measures make it impossible for a developer to push code, that developer is going to find a way to bypass the firewall. They’ll use a personal Dropbox. They’ll shadow IT their way into a disaster.
The "Rude" Firewall Problem
A "Bon Qui Qui" style security system is essentially a rude firewall. It says "no" by default without understanding the context of the request.
- Contextual Blindness: The system doesn't care if you're the CEO or a summer intern; if the box isn't checked, you're out.
- False Positives: It screams for security over a minor login discrepancy while ignoring a massive data egress because it "looks" like a scheduled backup.
- User Fatigue: People stop caring. They click "Allow" on every MFA prompt because they're tired of being yelled at by the software.
This leads to what researchers call "Security Fatigue." A study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found that a significant portion of computer users feel overwhelmed by the constant need to be "secure." When people are tired, they make mistakes. They stop being the first line of defense and start being the biggest vulnerability.
Real World Failures: When "Security!" Isn't Enough
Let's look at the MGM Resorts breach of 2023. This is the ultimate example of why loud security fails. MGM had state-of-the-art systems. They had "security security" coming out of their ears. But the attackers—a group known as Scattered Spider—didn't hack a firewall. They hacked a human.
They found an employee’s name on LinkedIn. They called the help desk. They acted like they belonged. They were charming. They weren't aggressive. They were the opposite of a Bon Qui Qui interaction. Because the help desk was trained to follow a script rather than think critically, the attackers got in.
The irony? While the attackers were moving through the network, legitimate employees were likely struggling with their own "security security" prompts, unable to access the very tools they needed to stop the attack.
Moving Toward "Quiet" Security
So, how do we fix this? How do we move away from the loud, performative, Bon Qui Qui style of defense and toward something that actually works?
It starts with Zero Trust, but not the marketing version of Zero Trust. True Zero Trust isn't about shouting "Security!" at everyone. It's about silent, continuous verification. It’s about looking at the behavior, not just the credentials.
If I'm logging in from my usual laptop, at my usual time, from my usual home office, why am I being prompted for three different codes? The system should know it's me. Conversely, if I'm suddenly logging in from a data center in a country I've never visited, and I'm trying to download the entire customer database at 3:00 AM, that is when the system should step in.
✨ Don't miss: What Does Pinning Mean? A Practical Look at Digital Bookmarking
The "Hospitality" Model of Tech Defense
We need to treat security more like high-end hospitality and less like a fast-food counter with a power trip.
- Invisible Authentication: Use device certificates and behavioral biometrics (how you type, how you move the mouse) to verify identity without interrupting the workflow.
- Least Privilege: Instead of one big "Security!" gate at the front, have small, silent checks throughout the journey. Give people exactly what they need to do their job and nothing more.
- Human-Centric Design: If your security policy requires a 24-character password changed every 30 days, you are inviting people to write their passwords on Post-it notes. Stop it.
The Cost of Being "That" Security Team
Honestly, if your security team is known as the "No" department, you've already lost. You’ve become the Bon Qui Qui of the organization. People will avoid you. They will hide their projects from you. They will see you as an obstacle to be bypassed rather than a partner to be consulted.
This creates a massive "Security Debt." It’s like technical debt, but more dangerous. It’s the accumulation of all the times someone took a shortcut because the official way was too hard. Over time, these shortcuts create a map of vulnerabilities that an attacker can navigate with ease.
Actionable Steps: De-Bon-Qui-Qui Your Infrastructure
If you're reading this and realizing your organization is a bit too loud and not quite effective enough, here is how you pivot. No, it won't happen overnight. Yes, it requires a cultural shift.
Audit the Friction
Go talk to your developers. Ask them what the most annoying part of their day is. If they say "the login process," you have a problem. Measure the time it takes for a new employee to get access to the tools they need. If it takes a week because of "security," your process is broken.
Identity is the New Perimeter
Stop obsessed with the network edge. The edge is gone. Everyone is remote. Your security should live at the identity level. Invest in Identity and Access Management (IAM) tools that prioritize user experience. If it’s easy to be secure, people will be secure.
Training, Not Shaming
Stop the "gotcha" phishing tests that are designed to make people look stupid. All that does is build resentment. Instead, teach people why certain threats matter. Give them a "Security" button in Outlook that they want to click because they know they'll be thanked, not scolded.
💡 You might also like: Hey Siri what is this song: How It Actually Works and Why It Sometimes Fails
Reward the "Wait, This Looks Weird" Moment
Cultivate a culture where a junior staffer feels comfortable questioning an "executive" request. This is the opposite of the Bon Qui Qui "don't question me" attitude. In a healthy security culture, everyone is empowered to pause the process if something feels off, without fear of being yelled at by "Security! Security!"
The Reality of the Threat Landscape
The world isn't getting any safer. Ransomware-as-a-service is a billion-dollar industry. AI-driven social engineering is making it nearly impossible to tell a deepfake voice from a real one. In this environment, we cannot afford to be distracted by the performance of security.
The "Security Security Bon Qui Qui" era of IT has to end. We need to stop being the loud, aggressive gatekeepers who ignore the real thieves while harassing the customers. We need to be the silent guardians who make it easy to do the right thing and impossible to do the wrong thing.
It’s about moving from a culture of "I'm a cut you" to a culture of "I've got your back."
Immediate Next Steps for IT Leaders:
- Review MFA logs: Look for "MFA Fatigue" patterns—users hitting 'deny' multiple times or 'allow' after ten failed attempts.
- Simplify Password Policies: Adopt NIST guidelines; stop forcing arbitrary character changes that lead to "Password123!" behaviors.
- Conduct a "Friction Audit": Spend a day shadowing a new hire to see where security measures actively prevent work.
- Empower the Help Desk: Give them better tools to verify identity so they don't have to rely on easily spoofed "security questions" or rigid scripts.