It was late 2015 when Sean Penn, a man more famous for winning Oscars than dodging bullets, decided to hop on a private jet and head deep into the Mexican jungle. He wasn’t there for a movie set. He was there to meet Joaquín "El Chapo" Guzmán, the world’s most wanted man, who had recently pulled off a cinematic escape from a maximum-security prison through a mile-long tunnel.
The resulting Sean Penn and El Chapo interview, published by Rolling Stone just a day after the kingpin’s recapture in early 2016, became one of the most polarizing moments in the history of celebrity journalism. It was messy. It was widely criticized. Honestly, it was kinda bizarre.
But what actually happened during those seven hours in the mountains of Sinaloa? And did Sean Penn really lead the Mexican marines straight to El Chapo’s door?
The Secret Meeting in the Mountains
The whole thing started with Kate del Castillo. She’s a massive Mexican soap opera star who had once tweeted something surprisingly sympathetic toward El Chapo. Apparently, the drug lord was a fan. He reached out to her because he wanted to make a biopic about his life—classic narcissism, right?—and he only trusted her to broker the deals.
Penn heard about this and hitched his wagon to her.
They took a journey that sounds like a bad spy novel. We're talking burner phones, encrypted messages, and a flight into a secret landing strip in the Sierra Madre mountains. Penn eventually found himself sitting across from a man responsible for thousands of deaths, eating tacos and drinking tequila.
🔗 Read more: How Old Is Paul Heyman? The Real Story of Wrestling’s Greatest Mind
Penn later wrote about the experience in a 10,000-word piece that was, frankly, a bit self-indulgent. He described the smell of the jungle, the security detail, and even his own flatulence during the trip. He spent seven hours with Guzmán, who bragged about having a "fleet of submarines, airplanes, trucks, and boats" and claimed he supplied more heroin and cocaine than anyone else on Earth.
The Ethical Minefield of the Sean Penn and El Chapo Interview
The backlash was instant. Why? Because Rolling Stone and Penn did something that makes professional journalists lose their minds: they gave the subject final approval over the story.
Basically, El Chapo got to read the draft before it went live.
While the magazine claimed he didn’t ask for any changes, the mere act of giving a mass murderer editorial control is a huge no-no in reporting. It turns a "hard-hitting interview" into a PR stunt. Mexican journalists, who risk their lives every day to cover the cartels without the protection of a Hollywood "A-list" status, were particularly disgusted. They saw it as an insult to the dozens of reporters murdered in Mexico for trying to tell the truth about the Sinaloa cartel.
The Capture Connection: Did Penn Snitch?
The timing was almost too perfect. Penn’s article dropped on January 9, 2016. El Chapo had been captured in a bloody shootout in Los Mochis just the day before.
💡 You might also like: Howie Mandel Cupcake Picture: What Really Happened With That Viral Post
Mexican officials were quick to say that the Sean Penn and El Chapo interview was "essential" to tracking him down. They claimed they were monitoring the actors and that the meeting provided the lead they needed to narrow down his location.
Penn, for his part, went on 60 Minutes later to defend himself. He called his article a "failure" because everyone was talking about him and the capture instead of his intended topic: the failed War on Drugs. He also denied that he was the reason El Chapo got caught, suggesting the Mexican government was just trying to save face by making it look like they hadn't been outsmarted by a movie star.
What Most People Get Wrong
People often think this was a sit-down Q&A with a notepad. It wasn't.
Most of the "interview" was actually a video Guzmán sent later. After their initial seven-hour booze-filled hang, the plan was to meet again for a formal interview. But the Mexican military started raiding the area, and the second meeting never happened. Instead, Penn sent questions via BlackBerry Messenger, and El Chapo recorded himself answering them in front of a chain-link fence, wearing a blue patterned shirt.
It wasn't exactly Frost/Nixon. It was more like a video diary of a fugitive.
📖 Related: Austin & Ally Maddie Ziegler Episode: What Really Happened in Homework & Hidden Talents
Legal Fallout and Kate del Castillo
While Penn mostly walked away with a bruised reputation, Kate del Castillo didn't have it so easy. She was investigated by the Mexican government for money laundering (related to her tequila brand and potential cartel funding), though she was never charged. She ended up staying in the U.S. for years, afraid to go back to Mexico, feeling like Penn had used her to get his "big scoop" and then left her to deal with the heat.
Why the Interview Still Matters Today
The Sean Penn and El Chapo interview remains a case study in "Access Journalism." It shows what happens when a celebrity’s desire for a "meaningful" experience crashes into the brutal reality of international crime.
If you're looking into this story to understand the ethics of modern media, keep these points in mind:
- Source Approval: Never give your subject the right to vet your story. It kills your credibility immediately.
- Safety vs. Ego: Penn had the luxury of a U.S. passport and a global platform. Local journalists in Sinaloa didn't.
- The Power of Celebrity: El Chapo didn't want a journalist; he wanted a movie star. He was looking for a legacy, not an interrogation.
If you want to understand the full scope of the Sinaloa cartel's influence, skip the Rolling Stone piece and look into the work of Alfredo Corchado or the late Javier Valdez Cárdenas. Their reporting provides the gritty, dangerous context that Penn’s travelogue missed.
To get a better sense of how the cartel actually operates beyond the "businessman" persona Guzmán tried to sell Penn, you should look into the court transcripts from his 2019 trial in New York. The evidence there paints a much more violent and less "cinematic" picture of the man in the blue shirt.