It was November 29, 1864. Most people today call it a battle, but if you look at the actual records from the Joint Committee on the Conduct of the War, the word "battle" feels like a lie. It was a slaughter. Imagine hundreds of Cheyenne and Arapaho people—mostly women, children, and the elderly—sleeping under a white flag of truce and the American flag. They thought they were safe. They were wrong.
John Chivington, a Methodist preacher turned Colonel, didn't care about the white flag. He didn't care about the peace talks that had happened just weeks prior at Camp Weld. He wanted a "victory" to bolster his political ambitions and to settle the "Indian problem" in Colorado Territory once and for all. What followed at the Sand Creek Massacre wasn't just a military engagement; it was a fundamental betrayal that changed the American West forever.
The Messy Politics Behind the Sand Creek Massacre
To understand why this happened, you have to look at the mess that was Colorado in the early 1860s. The Civil War was raging back East, pulling regular troops away from the frontier. This left "Home Guards" and volunteer regiments in charge. These guys weren't exactly disciplined soldiers. Many were bored, angry, and looking for a fight.
Governor John Evans was under a ton of pressure. The Pike’s Peak Gold Rush had flooded the area with white settlers, and tensions over land were at a breaking point. Evans issued a proclamation in the summer of 1864, basically telling "friendly Indians" to go to specific forts for protection. Those who didn't would be considered hostiles.
Black Kettle and the Quest for Peace
Black Kettle, a Cheyenne chief, actually tried to follow the rules. He wasn't a warmonger. He genuinely believed that negotiation was the only way for his people to survive. He met with Evans and Chivington in Denver. He was told to bring his people to Fort Lyon. Major Edward Wynkoop, who was in charge there at first, actually treated the tribes with some level of decency. He saw they were starving and desperate.
But then Wynkoop was replaced by Major Scott Anthony, a man much more aligned with Chivington’s "exterminate them all" vibe. Anthony told Black Kettle and his followers to camp at Sand Creek, about 40 miles away, while they waited for further instructions. They were essentially sitting ducks.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Air France Crash Toronto Miracle Still Changes How We Fly
The Morning the World Broke
The attack started at dawn. Chivington had roughly 675 men from the 1st Colorado Cavalry, the 3rd Colorado Cavalry, and a company of the 1st New Mexico Volunteer Infantry. They’d been drinking. They were tired from a long night march. And they were ready to kill.
When the troops appeared on the horizon, Black Kettle did exactly what he thought would save his people. He raised an American flag and a small white flag over his lodge. He shouted to his people not to be afraid, believing the soldiers wouldn't fire on a flag of peace.
He was wrong.
The soldiers opened fire with mountain howitzers. It wasn't a fight. It was chaos. The Cheyenne and Arapaho tried to flee up the dry creek bed, digging into the sand banks to try and find cover. It didn't help much.
Witnessing the Unthinkable
We know about the horrors because of men like Captain Silas Soule and Lieutenant Joseph Cramer. They were there, but they refused to order their men to fire. Soule later wrote letters to Wynkoop describing soldiers cutting unborn infants out of their mothers and mutilating bodies in ways that are too graphic for most history books.
🔗 Read more: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy
- Soule's bravery cost him his life; he was murdered in Denver just months after testifying about the massacre.
- The 3rd Colorado Cavalry, often called the "Bloodless Third" before the massacre, returned to Denver to a hero’s welcome, even parading body parts through the streets as trophies.
Why the "Battle" Narrative is a Myth
For a long time, the event was framed as the "Battle of Sand Creek." This wasn't an accident. Chivington and Evans worked hard to spin it as a glorious victory against a dangerous, well-armed force. They claimed they killed 500-600 warriors.
The truth? Most historians, including those at the National Park Service, estimate the death toll at about 230 people. Somewhere around 150 of those were women and children. That's not a battle. That’s a war crime.
The Sand Creek Massacre became a turning point. Before 1864, many Cheyenne and Arapaho leaders still thought they could coexist with the settlers. After Sand Creek, that hope died. The survivors fled north to join the Northern Cheyenne and the Lakota. This fueled the fires of the Great Plains Wars for the next two decades. If you’ve ever wondered why the Little Bighorn happened, you can trace the anger directly back to the blood in the sand at the Big Sandy Creek.
The Long Road to Recognition
It took a long time for the U.S. government to admit what happened. Even though a Congressional investigation in 1865 condemned Chivington’s actions in the harshest possible terms—calling him a "coward" and his actions "disgraceful"—he was never court-martialed because he had already resigned his commission.
It wasn’t until 2007 that the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site was formally dedicated. It’s a somber place in Kiowa County, Colorado. There are no flashy monuments. It’s just open prairie and the wind.
💡 You might also like: Why the Recent Snowfall Western New York State Emergency Was Different
The Lingering Impact on Descendant Communities
For the Cheyenne and Arapaho tribes, Sand Creek isn't "history." It’s a living trauma. Families still pass down the stories of who was lost. The loss of the "Peace Chiefs"—the leaders like White Antelope who died singing his death song rather than fighting back—decimated the social structure of the tribes.
You can't just "get over" something like that. The legal battles over land and reparations promised in the 1865 Treaty of Little Arkansas continue in various forms to this day. The government promised land and goods to the survivors as a form of apology. They never fully followed through.
How to Properly Research the Massacre
If you're looking to dig deeper into the Sand Creek Massacre, you have to be careful with your sources. Older textbooks often gloss over the brutality or try to "both sides" the issue.
- Read the Congressional testimony from 1865. It's raw and unfiltered.
- Look at the work of Dr. Ari Kelman, particularly his book A Misplaced Massacre. He does a great job explaining how the memory of the event has been fought over for 150 years.
- Check out the primary accounts from George Bent. He was a half-Cheyenne survivor of the massacre and provided some of the most detailed accounts of the camp's layout and the initial moments of the attack.
Practical Steps for History Buffs and Travelers
Visiting the site today requires a specific mindset. It’s not a "tourist attraction." It’s a graveyard.
- Check the weather: The site is remote. Eastern Colorado weather can turn on a dime, and the dirt roads leading to the site can become impassable in heavy rain or snow.
- Respect the silence: The National Park Service asks visitors to remain quiet and stay on designated trails. Many descendants visit to perform ceremonies.
- Start at the Visitor Center: Don't just wander out. Talk to the rangers. They have maps that show exactly where the lodges were and where the "sand pits" were dug by desperate families.
- Support Tribal Education: Instead of just buying a souvenir, consider looking into the Sand Creek Massacre Spiritual Healing Run/Walk, which happens every year. It’s a way to support the descendant communities directly.
The story of Sand Creek is uncomfortable. It challenges the "Wild West" myth of brave soldiers and noble pioneers. But honestly, if we don't look at the dark parts of history, we're just reading fairy tales. Understanding what happened on that creek bed is the only way to truly understand the American West as it exists today.
Explore the National Park Service archives or visit the History Colorado Center in Denver. They have an exhibit specifically co-created with the tribes that corrects a lot of the old misinformation. Seeing the artifacts and hearing the oral histories puts a human face on the statistics. It's one thing to read that 230 people died; it's another to see the items they left behind while running for their lives.