You've seen the tweets. You’ve probably seen the TikTok clips with the dramatic music and the red "EXPOSED" text flashing across the screen. There is a persistent, loud, and often angry conversation happening online right now centered on the idea that ABC News is fake news. It isn't just a fringe theory anymore; it has become a central pillar of the modern "media trust" debate. But when we actually strip away the partisan shouting and look at the mechanics of how a legacy network operates, the reality is a lot more complicated than a simple "true or false" checkbox.
Trust is hard to build. It’s incredibly easy to break.
The phrase "fake news" used to mean something specific—literally fabricated stories, like the Pope endorsing a candidate or a pizza shop harboring a secret basement that didn't exist. Now? It’s a catch-all. People use it to describe bias, editorial mistakes, or even just stories they don't like. If you’re looking at ABC News through that lens, you’re going to find plenty of ammunition, but you’re also going to find a massive, billion-dollar newsgathering operation that still adheres to traditional (though imperfect) journalistic standards.
Why the "ABC News Is Fake News" Label Stuck
People don't just wake up and decide to hate a news outlet for no reason. There are specific, high-profile moments that critics point to as "smoking guns." One of the biggest was the Brian Ross situation in 2017. Ross, a veteran investigative reporter, reported that Michael Flynn was going to testify that Donald Trump directed him to contact Russian officials during the campaign.
That was a massive error. Huge.
It turned out the instruction happened during the transition, which is a standard, legal part of any incoming administration's job. The stock market actually dipped because of that report. ABC eventually suspended Ross and he later left the network. For critics, this wasn't just a mistake; it was proof of an agenda. When a mistake only ever seems to swing in one political direction, the audience stops calling it an "error" and starts calling it "fake news."
💡 You might also like: Brian Walshe Trial Date: What Really Happened with the Verdict
Then you have the 2019 incident with the Syria footage. ABC aired a clip they claimed showed a Turkish attack on Kurdish civilians. It was actually footage from a night-time gun demonstration at a firing range in Kentucky. Someone on the social media team or the editing desk messed up, big time. It was a glaring, embarrassing failure of "vetting," which is supposed to be the one thing big networks are good at.
Editorial Bias vs. Objective Fact
There is a massive difference between "this didn't happen" and "I don't like how you’re framing this." Most of the time, when people argue ABC News is fake news, they are actually complaining about selection bias.
If ABC spends ten minutes on a story about climate change and ten seconds on a story about a whistleblower in the Department of Justice, is that "fake"? Technically, no. Both events are happening. But by choosing what to highlight and what to ignore, the network creates a specific reality for its viewers. This is what media critics like Noam Chomsky or even modern conservative pundits point to. It’s the "gatekeeping" role.
The network's flagship show, World News Tonight with David Muir, consistently ranks as the most-watched news program in America. Because it has such a massive reach, every single word is scrutinized. If Muir uses a specific adjective to describe a protest—say, "mostly peaceful" versus "violent"—he is instantly branded as a liar by one half of the country. This isn't necessarily because the reporting is "fake," but because the objective truth of a chaotic event is often in the eye of the beholder.
The Pressure of the 24-Hour Cycle
The speed of the internet is killing traditional journalism. Honestly, it’s a mess.
📖 Related: How Old is CHRR? What People Get Wrong About the Ohio State Research Giant
In the old days, you had until 6:00 PM to get the story right. Now, if you aren't first on Twitter, you're irrelevant. This "first-to-market" pressure leads to sloppy sourcing. We saw this during the Covington Catholic incident. ABC, along with basically every other major outlet, jumped on a short video clip without looking at the full context of what happened at the Lincoln Memorial. They characterized the students in a way that later resulted in legal threats and retractions.
Is that "fake news"? It’s certainly bad journalism. It’s reactive. It’s lazy. But is it a coordinated lie? That’s where the debate gets murky. Most people inside these newsrooms genuinely believe they are the "good guys." They have layers of lawyers and "standards and practices" executives who have to sign off on big stories. But those layers are human. Humans have blind spots.
Ownership and Corporate Influence
ABC is owned by Disney. That’s a fact that weirdly gets overlooked in these debates.
Think about that for a second. The company that brings you Mickey Mouse and Marvel also controls one of the most powerful news divisions in the world. This creates a natural conflict of interest, or at least the appearance of one. You rarely see ABC News do a hard-hitting investigative piece on Disney’s labor practices or their tax breaks in Florida.
When a news organization is a small part of a massive corporate conglomerate, the "news" often becomes "content." Content is designed to keep you watching so you don't change the channel before the commercials. This leads to sensationalism. Sensationalism feels like "fake news" because it blows minor issues out of proportion to trigger an emotional response. If every storm is a "historic mega-disaster," eventually people stop believing you when a real disaster happens.
👉 See also: The Yogurt Shop Murders Location: What Actually Stands There Today
How to Spot the Difference
If you're tired of feeling like you're being lied to, you have to change how you consume the news. You can't just rely on one straw-man argument that ABC News is fake news and then go get your news from a random guy on YouTube who has no editors at all. That’s just trading one problem for a worse one.
You have to look at the sourcing. When ABC runs a story, are they saying "sources tell us" or are they showing you a primary document? If it’s an anonymous source, you should be skeptical. If they are showing a leaked memo, you can read it for yourself.
- Check the retractions. Real "fake news" sites never admit they were wrong. ABC actually has a "corrections" page. Ironically, the fact that they admit mistakes is a sign of a real news organization, even if those mistakes are the very things people use to call them "fake."
- Watch the framing. Notice the "loaded language." If an anchor uses words like "baseless," "controversial," or "heroic," they are telling you how to feel, not just what happened.
- Cross-reference. If ABC is reporting something, see how the AP (Associated Press) or Reuters is reporting it. Those wire services are generally the "gold standard" for dry, boring, just-the-facts news. If ABC’s version is 10x more dramatic than the AP’s, the "extra" stuff is probably fluff or bias.
The Reality of Media in 2026
The truth is that ABC News operates within a "corporate-liberal" consensus. They aren't going to call for the overthrow of capitalism, and they aren't going to ignore social justice issues that their urban, educated staff care about. They have a specific worldview.
Calling it "fake news" is a rhetorical shortcut. It’s a way to dismiss information without having to engage with it. But it’s also a warning shot. When half the country feels like a major news outlet doesn't represent their reality—or worse, is actively hostile to it—that outlet has a massive credibility problem. ABC has a lot of work to do to win back the people who have checked out.
They won't do it by being more "first." They’ll only do it by being more "right."
Practical Steps for Savvy News Consumers
Stop being a passive consumer. It’s exhausting, I know, but it’s the only way to stay sane in this environment.
- Diversify your feed. If you follow ABC, follow a staunchly conservative outlet and a staunchly progressive independent outlet. The truth is usually buried somewhere in the middle of that Venn diagram.
- Read the full story. Most "fake news" accusations come from people who only read the headline. Headlines are written by editors to get clicks, not by the reporters who wrote the story. Often, the nuance is in paragraph 12.
- Identify the "Opinion" pieces. ABC, like many others, often blurs the line between news and commentary. If George Stephanopoulos is giving his take, that’s opinion, even if he’s sitting behind a news desk.
The media landscape isn't going to get simpler. It's only going to get more fractured. Understanding why people claim ABC News is fake news helps you see the cracks in the system, but it's up to you to decide which pieces of the puzzle are worth keeping. Pay attention to the patterns, not just the single outrages.