You’ve probably seen the painting. A giant, glowing woman in a white dress floats across the plains, stringing telegraph wires while buffalo and Native Americans flee into the shadows. It’s called American Progress by John Gast, and it’s basically the visual shorthand for one of the most aggressive, influential, and—let’s be honest—complicated ideas in U.S. history.
But what is the actual meaning of manifest destiny?
If you ask a textbook, it’ll tell you it was the 19th-century belief that the United States was destined by God to expand across North America. Sounds simple. Almost inevitable. But history is rarely that clean. In reality, Manifest Destiny wasn’t a law or a government policy. It was a vibe. A marketing campaign. A religious justification for grabbing land that belonged to someone else. It was messy, loud, and deeply controversial even when it was happening.
Who Actually Coined the Phrase?
It wasn't a President or a General. It was a guy named John L. O’Sullivan.
O'Sullivan was a columnist and editor who, in 1845, was trying to argue that the U.S. should annex the Republic of Texas. He wrote in the United States Magazine and Democratic Review about "our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions."
He wasn't trying to be poetic. He was trying to be persuasive.
Back then, the U.S. was a young, scrappy, and slightly insecure nation. People were terrified of European powers—especially Britain and Spain—snagging land in the West. O'Sullivan’s phrase gave Americans a moral "get out of jail free" card. If God wanted the U.S. to own the Pacific coast, then taking it wasn't just a political move. It was a divine mission.
It wasn't just about land.
It was about an idea of exceptionalism. The "destiny" part suggested that American institutions—democracy, Protestantism, capitalism—were objectively better than what existed elsewhere. This is where things get uncomfortable. Because if your way of life is "destined" to spread, anyone standing in the way is suddenly an obstacle to progress.
✨ Don't miss: The Long Haired Russian Cat Explained: Why the Siberian is Basically a Living Legend
The Three Pillars of the Meaning of Manifest Destiny
To really get what this meant to a pioneer in a wagon or a politician in D.C., you have to look at the three core assumptions that held the whole thing up.
First, the virtue of the American people. There was this unshakable belief that the American experiment was unique. It wasn't just another country; it was a "city on a hill."
Second, the mission to spread these institutions. This wasn't supposed to be a passive thing. You didn't just sit back and hope people liked your democracy. You brought it to them. Or, more accurately, you moved onto their land and set it up.
Third, an irresistible destiny. This is the kicker. It implies that expansion was going to happen regardless of what anyone did. It was like gravity. You can't argue with gravity, right?
The War That Made It Real
The Mexican-American War (1846–1848) is where the meaning of manifest destiny shifted from a magazine column to a bloody reality. President James K. Polk was the ultimate Manifest Destiny president. He wanted California. He wanted New Mexico. He wanted it all.
But not everyone was on board.
A young Congressman named Abraham Lincoln actually challenged the war’s justifications. Famous author Henry David Thoreau even went to jail for refusing to pay taxes that supported the conflict, which led to his famous essay Civil Disobedience. People often forget that Manifest Destiny was a partisan issue. The Democrats loved it; the Whigs were often terrified it would lead to a massive fight over slavery.
🔗 Read more: Why Every Mom and Daughter Photo You Take Actually Matters
They were right.
When the U.S. finally signed the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, it gained 525,000 square miles of territory. That sounds like a win until you realize it reignited the most toxic debate in American history: Would these new lands allow slavery? Manifest Destiny didn't just expand the borders; it accelerated the countdown to the Civil War.
The Human Cost Most People Skip
We often talk about "expansion" like it happened in an empty room. It didn't.
For the Indigenous nations living on that land—the Comanche, the Lakota, the Nez Perce, and hundreds of others—Manifest Destiny didn't mean "progress." It meant displacement, broken treaties, and systemic violence. The Indian Removal Act of 1830, which led to the Trail of Tears, was a precursor to this mindset.
If you were a Mexican citizen living in what is now California or Texas, your world flipped upside down overnight. Suddenly, you were a "foreigner" on your own ranch. The racial hierarchies of the time were baked into the very definition of the term. O’Sullivan and his peers weren't imagining a multicultural utopia; they were imagining a white, Anglo-Saxon Protestant empire.
Is Manifest Destiny Still a Thing?
Honestly, yeah. It just changed its clothes.
When we talk about "spreading democracy" abroad today, or even when tech billionaires talk about colonizing Mars, there’s a ghost of Manifest Destiny in the room. It’s that same sense of "we have a great idea, and it’s our duty to bring it everywhere."
💡 You might also like: Sport watch water resist explained: why 50 meters doesn't mean you can dive
Historian Frederick Jackson Turner famously argued in 1893 that the "frontier" was closed. But Americans didn't just stop. The energy of Manifest Destiny spilled over into the Spanish-American War, the annexation of Hawaii, and the U.S. involvement in the Philippines. We stopped looking at the West and started looking at the globe.
It’s the DNA of American Identity
Whether you think it was a glorious era of growth or a dark chapter of imperialism, you can't understand the United States without it. It’s why we value "rugged individualism." It’s why we’re obsessed with the "next big thing."
How to Rethink This History
Understanding the meaning of manifest destiny requires holding two truths at once. You can acknowledge the incredible logistical feat of settling a continent while also acknowledging the immense suffering it caused. History isn't a zero-sum game.
If you want to dive deeper into how this period actually functioned, stop looking at the high-level maps and start looking at the primary sources.
- Read the actual letters of pioneers. Most weren't thinking about "destiny." They were thinking about debt, cheap land, and a fresh start.
- Look at the maps from 1840 vs. 1850. The sheer speed of change is staggering.
- Check out the works of modern historians like Patty Limerick. She’s part of the "New Western History" movement that looks at the West as a place of encounter and conflict rather than just a blank slate for "progress."
The legacy of this era is everywhere. It’s in our national parks. It’s in our interstate system. It’s in the way we talk about the American Dream. By understanding that Manifest Destiny was a choice—not an inevitability—we get a much clearer picture of who we are today and where we might be headed next.
If you're visiting a National Park in the West this year, take a second to look past the "pristine" nature. Look for the traces of the people who were there before the maps were redrawn. Understanding the layers of the land is the first step toward a more honest relationship with our own history. Search for local tribal history centers near your next destination; they often provide a perspective on "expansion" that you won't find in the standard roadside plaques.