The Real Fantastic Four First Steps Rating: What the Critics and Fans Actually Think

The Real Fantastic Four First Steps Rating: What the Critics and Fans Actually Think

It is finally happening. After years of Fox-era misfires and that weird, unreleased 1994 Roger Corman flick, Marvel's First Family is home. But let’s be real for a second—everyone is holding their breath. The Fantastic Four First Steps rating is currently the most debated metric in the MCU fandom, mostly because it represents a make-or-break moment for Kevin Feige’s Phase 6.

People are exhausted by mediocre superhero movies. We've seen the "origin story" done to death. This time, Marvel Studios is taking a massive gamble by dropping us into a retro-futuristic 1960s alternate reality. It's bold. It's colorful. But does it actually work? Early buzz from test screenings and industry insiders suggests a rating profile that looks very different from the dark, gritty tone of the 2015 "Fant-4-stic" disaster.

Why the Fantastic Four First Steps Rating Matters More Than You Think

Ratings aren't just numbers on a screen. They're a pulse check. When we look at the Fantastic Four First Steps rating, we're looking at whether Disney has finally figured out how to balance the "family dynamic" with high-stakes cosmic horror.

Director Matt Shakman, who basically saved the MCU’s experimental reputation with WandaVision, is at the helm here. He isn't aiming for a generic PG-13 actioner. Reports indicate the film is leaning heavily into a "60s Optimism" vibe, which affects the critical reception significantly. Critics who have seen early assemblies are reportedly praising the chemistry between Pedro Pascal (Reed Richards) and Vanessa Kirby (Sue Storm).

If the movie lands a "Fresh" rating above 80% on Rotten Tomatoes, it’s a win. If it dips into the 60s? Well, then we might be looking at the end of the "event cinema" era for Marvel. Honestly, the stakes couldn't be higher.

Breaking Down the Visuals and Tone

The aesthetic is a huge factor in the early Fantastic Four First Steps rating discussions. We aren't getting another grey, concrete-filled New York City. We’re getting a world that looks like a Syd Mead painting come to life.

  • The Retro-Futurism: It feels like the Space Age that never was.
  • The Casting: Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm is apparently a scene-stealer, bringing a kinetic energy that balances Ebon Moss-Bachrach’s soulful, rocky Ben Grimm.
  • The Villain Factor: Ralph Ineson as Galactus. Just let that sink in. A giant, world-eating entity voiced by the guy with the deepest voice in Hollywood.

This shift in tone is specifically designed to pull in the "Discover" crowd—those casual viewers who are tired of the multiverse being a confusing mess of homework. It's a standalone feel, even if we know it’ll eventually crash into the Avengers.

The Critics vs. The Fans: A Divide in the Rating?

History shows us that Fantastic Four movies usually suffer from a massive disconnect. Critics hated the 2005 version, but kids loved it (mostly for Chris Evans' Johnny Storm). The 2015 version? Everyone hated that.

With First Steps, the Fantastic Four First Steps rating is expected to bridge that gap. Why? Because it’s leaning into the weirdness. You can't do the Fantastic Four without the "science-family" element. If you make it a brooding war movie, you fail. If you make it a slapstick comedy, you fail.

Insiders like Justin Kroll and various trade reporters have hinted that the internal "score" for the script was incredibly high because it focuses on the internal friction of the team. They aren't just superheroes; they're astronauts who got mutated and are kinda freaked out about it. That human element is what usually drives a high rating in the modern era of cinema.

The Galactus Problem

Let’s talk about the elephant in the room—or rather, the giant purple man in the solar system. The Fantastic Four First Steps rating will live or die by how they handle Galactus. If he’s a cloud again (looking at you, Rise of the Silver Surfer), the rating will plummet to zero instantly.

The word on the street is that Galactus is being treated as a cosmic horror element. Think Arrival meets Independence Day. It’s not just a big guy in a suit; it’s an inevitable natural disaster. This "prestige" approach to a cosmic villain is likely to earn higher marks from older critics who usually scoff at cape-and-cowl flicks.

Looking Back to Move Forward

To understand the Fantastic Four First Steps rating, we have to look at the track record of this franchise. It’s cursed. Seriously.

  1. 1994 (Unreleased): A literal tax write-off.
  2. 2005/2007: Fun, but cheesy. They sit in the 20-30% range on many critical sites today.
  3. 2015: A 9% on Rotten Tomatoes. A total catastrophe.

The jump from a 9% to what Marvel is aiming for—presumably the 85-95% "prestige" tier occupied by Guardians of the Galaxy or Iron Man—is a huge leap. But with a cast that includes Emmy and Oscar nominees, the "prestige" factor is baked into the DNA of this production.

📖 Related: Why You Need to Watch The Devil's Backbone Before You See Any Other Guillermo del Toro Film

Real Talk: Is the Hype Real?

I've talked to people who track these things closely. The excitement isn't just "Marvel Fanboy" energy. It’s "Cinema Enthusiast" energy. People want to see Vanessa Kirby lead a franchise. They want to see Pedro Pascal be a nerd instead of a tired dad for once.

The Fantastic Four First Steps rating will ultimately be a reflection of whether Marvel can still surprise us. If it feels like a factory-produced product, the rating will reflect that boredom. If it feels like Matt Shakman's specific, weird vision of the 1960s, it’s going to soar.

As we get closer to the release, you’re going to see a lot of "leaked" ratings and social media reactions. Take them with a grain of salt. "Breathtaking" and "Masterpiece" are the currency of early Twitter reactions, but the actual Fantastic Four First Steps rating that matters is the one that lands after the first weekend of wide release.

What we do know is that the musical score by Michael Giacchino is already being cited as a highlight. A good score can bump a movie's emotional resonance—and its rating—by a significant margin. Think about how the Star Wars or Indiana Jones themes elevated those films.

Actionable Takeaways for Fans Tracking the Movie

If you're following the Fantastic Four First Steps rating to decide if it's worth the IMAX ticket, keep an eye on these specific indicators:

  • The "Vibe" Shift: Watch the second trailer. If the humor feels forced, worry. If the humor feels like a family bickering over Thanksgiving dinner, get excited.
  • The Silver Surfer Factor: Julia Garner is playing Shalla-Bal. This is a departure from the traditional Norrin Radd. How critics react to this change will be a major component of the final score.
  • CinemaScore Predictions: This movie needs an 'A' or 'A-' to have legs. Anything in the 'B' range for a Marvel movie usually indicates a steep second-week drop.

The Fantastic Four First Steps rating isn't just a number; it's the grade for Marvel's biggest homework assignment in a decade. They had to get the casting right. They had to get the era right. And they absolutely had to get the "Thing" right (thankfully, he's a practical suit this time, not just 100% CGI).

When the final reviews hit, look for mentions of "sincerity." That is the secret weapon of the Fantastic Four. In a world of cynical, meta-humor superheroes, a team that genuinely loves each other and cares about discovery might be exactly what the audience is craving.

The path to a high rating is narrow, but for the first time in twenty years, it looks like the Fantastic Four are actually on the right track. No more clouds. No more gritty reboots. Just a family, a spaceship, and a very large man coming to eat the planet. Basically, exactly what we wanted all along.

To stay ahead of the curve, monitor the official trade reviews three days before the global premiere; this is when the embargo typically lifts and the most honest assessments of the script's pacing and the third-act CGI quality will finally surface. Check the Rotten Tomatoes "Top Critics" filter specifically, as this film is aiming for a more sophisticated "film school" appreciation than recent multiverse entries. Once the film opens, pay attention to the "Verified Audience" score on Fandango to see if the retro-stylings actually resonate with families or if it’s too niche for the general public.