George R.R. Martin loves a good mess. If you’ve spent any time at all in the A Song of Ice and Fire fandom—or if you just suffered through the final seasons of Game of Thrones—you know that the Prince That Was Promised is the holy grail of theories. It’s the one thread that's supposed to tie everything together. But honestly? It’s also the biggest source of headache for readers because it’s messy, contradictory, and probably meant to subvert every trope we’ve ever learned about "The Chosen One."
Prophecy is a sword without a hilt. That’s a line from the books, and it’s basically Martin telling the audience to stop taking things so literally. The Prince That Was Promised isn't just a cool title; it’s a burden, a trap, and a mystery that might not even have a "clean" answer.
Where Did This "Prince" Even Come From?
We have to go back to the source. In the books, this isn't just something Melisandre shouts while burning people on a beach. It’s a Valyrian prophecy that's thousands of years old. The core idea is that a savior will come to deliver the world from darkness (the Great Other, the Long Night, whatever you want to call the icy apocalypse).
The Prince is often used interchangeably with Azor Ahai, a legendary hero from Eastern lore who forged a sword called Lightbringer by plunging it into his wife’s heart. Yeah, it’s dark. It's not a Disney story. According to the woods witch who spoke to King Jaehaerys II (Daenerys’s grandfather), this Prince would be born from the line of Aerys and Rhaella Targaryen.
This is why Rhaegar Targaryen was so obsessed. He spent his whole life trying to "become" the prophecy or sire the person who would. He famously told Maester Aemon that "his is the song of ice and fire." He thought it was him. Then he thought it was his son, Aegon. Then he went off with Lyanna Stark, presumably to get that "ice" element into the Targaryen "fire" bloodline.
The Jon vs. Dany Debate (And Everyone Else)
If you ask ten fans who the Prince That Was Promised is, you’ll get twelve different answers. Most people land on Jon Snow or Daenerys Targaryen.
Dany has the best "visual" resume. She was literally born amidst salt (Dragonstone) and smoke (Drogo’s funeral pyre). She "woke dragons from stone," which is a specific requirement mentioned in several versions of the prophecy. Maester Aemon, right before he died, was convinced it was her. He even pointed out that the Valyrian word for "Prince" is gender-neutral. It could be a Princess.
Then there’s Jon Snow.
He’s the literal union of Ice (Stark) and Fire (Targaryen). In A Dance with Dragons, when Melisandre asks R’hllor for a glimpse of Azor Ahai, she complains that "I pray for a glimpse of Azor Ahai, and he shows me only Snow." Capital S. It’s right there.
But Martin is rarely that straightforward. There’s a whole contingent of readers who think Stannis Baratheon was a "false" version meant to show us how easily prophecy can be manipulated. There are even wilder theories about Jaime Lannister or Theon Greyjoy. Some people think it’s not a person at all, but a collective effort.
Why the Show Version Felt Like a Letdown
Let’s be real. HBO’s Game of Thrones kind of fumbled the bag on this one. For years, they built up the "Prince" lore. They had Melisandre whispering in everyone's ear. They had the "dagger" with the inscription that became a huge plot point in House of the Dragon.
And then Arya Stark killed the Night King.
Look, Arya is great. But she doesn't fit the "Prince That Was Promised" criteria by any stretch of the imagination. She wasn't born of the Targaryen line (unless there’s a secret we really don't know). She didn't wake dragons from stone. The showrunners, Benioff and Weiss, admitted they chose her because it was "unexpected."
That’s the problem with subverting expectations just for the sake of a twist. It renders the internal logic of the world moot. If the prophecy doesn't matter, why spend decades building it up? House of the Dragon has tried to fix this by retroactively making the prophecy a Targaryen family secret passed from King to heir. It adds weight back to the idea, but it also makes the ending of the original series even more confusing.
The Salt and Smoke Problem
The prophecy requires the hero to be born "amidst salt and smoke." This is where the fan theories get really granular.
- Jon Snow: When he was stabbed at Castle Black, his wounds smoked in the cold air, and Bowen Marsh was crying (salt). It’s a stretch, but it’s there.
- Daenerys: The pyre at the end of Book 1. The smoke of the fire, the salt of the tears (or the sea air of Dragonstone).
- Victarion Greyjoy: He’s literally a sailor (salt) with a charred, magic hand (smoke). People love this one because it’s so absurdly literal.
The truth is, prophecies in Martin’s world are "perilous." They often come true in ways that the characters don't expect or in ways that destroy the person trying to fulfill them. Rhaegar Targaryen’s obsession with the Prince That Was Promised basically led to the downfall of his entire dynasty. He was so focused on the "Song of Ice and Fire" that he started a civil war.
What Most People Get Wrong About Lightbringer
Everyone thinks Lightbringer is a physical sword. Maybe it is. Maybe it’s the sword Dawn, currently sitting at Starfall.
But there’s a massive theory that the "sword" is actually the Night’s Watch. Or it’s the dragons. Or it’s a person. If the Prince is the leader, then the "weapon" they wield to defeat the darkness could be the unity of the Seven Kingdoms.
Also, we can't ignore the "Nissa Nissa" aspect. To forge the sword, the hero had to sacrifice the thing they loved most. If Jon is the Prince, does he have to kill Dany? (The show did this, though not for prophecy reasons). If Dany is the Princess, what does she have to lose? She’s already lost almost everyone.
The Aegon (Young Griff) Factor
We can’t talk about the Prince That Was Promised without mentioning the character the show completely cut: Young Griff. He claims to be Aegon Targaryen, Rhaegar’s firstborn son who supposedly survived the sack of King's Landing.
🔗 Read more: When Did Heartland Come Out? The Surprising Timeline of TV’s Longest Drama
If he’s real, he has the "best" claim to being the Prince. Rhaegar literally said of him, "He is the prince that was promised, and his is the song of ice and fire." If Aegon is a "mummer’s dragon" (a fake), it adds another layer of deception. It means the prophecy is being used as a political tool to put a pretender on the throne. This is the kind of complexity Martin thrives on. It’s not about magic; it’s about how people react to the idea of magic.
Real-World Context and Influences
Martin didn't pull this out of thin air. He’s heavily influenced by the "Eternal Champion" trope from Michael Moorcock and, of course, the Messianic archetypes in Dune and Lord of the Rings.
But he’s also looking at real history. Throughout history, people have claimed to be "chosen" to lead their people out of darkness, usually resulting in a lot of blood. By making the Prince That Was Promised so vague, Martin is commenting on the human desire for a "Great Man" to come and fix everything. We want a hero. We want a prophecy to tell us it’s all going to be okay. But in Westeros, relying on a hero usually gets you killed.
Practical Insights for Navigating the Lore
If you're trying to make sense of all this before The Winds of Winter (if it ever comes out) or the next season of House of the Dragon, keep these points in mind:
- Don't trust the characters. Melisandre is frequently wrong. Benerro is probably wrong. The characters are interpreting these signs through their own biases.
- Look for the "Third Option." Martin rarely chooses the most obvious path. If it seems like it's definitely Jon or definitely Dany, it's probably both or neither.
- Watch the "Dagger" in House of the Dragon. The showrunners are clearly using that prop to bridge the gap between the eras. It’s a tangible link to the "Promised" lore.
- Prophecy is a trap. Remember that Rhaegar’s belief in this story is what caused the tragedy at Summerhall and the rebellion. The Prince might not be a "savior" in the way we think. He or she might be a harbinger of destruction.
The Prince That Was Promised remains the most compelling mystery in modern fantasy because it refuses to be solved. It’s a puzzle with pieces that don't quite fit, and that’s exactly why we’re still talking about it years later.
To truly understand the Prince That Was Promised, you have to stop looking for a hero and start looking for a tragedy. The story isn't about a guy with a flaming sword saving the day; it's about the cost of believing you're the only one who can.
Actionable Next Steps:
- Compare the texts: Re-read the "House of the Undying" chapter in A Clash of Kings alongside the "Aemon’s Death" chapter in A Feast for Crows. Notice how the descriptions of the Prince change depending on who is talking.
- Track the Dagger: If you are watching House of the Dragon, pay attention to who holds the Valyrian steel dagger. The show is positioning this physical object as the "proof" of the prophecy, which is a major departure from the book's more nebulous approach.
- Analyze the "Salt and Smoke" symbols: Look for these two elements in the background of major character "rebirth" scenes. Martin often hides these clues in the environment rather than the dialogue.