You’ve seen it. That coworker who was a world-class coder suddenly becomes a nightmare manager. Or the teacher who connected with every student but flails the second they’re made principal. It’s frustrating. It's weird. Honestly, it feels like the universe is playing a sick joke on productive people. But in 1969, a Canadian educator named Laurence J. Peter and his co-author Raymond Hull finally put a name to this madness. They wrote The Peter Principle book, and it basically changed how we look at office hierarchies forever.
The core idea is almost painfully simple: In a hierarchy, every employee tends to rise to their level of incompetence.
Think about that for a second. If you're good at your job, you get a promotion. If you're good at that job, you get another one. This keeps happening until you reach a role where you’re finally out of your depth. Then, you stop moving. You stay there. You’re no longer "the great salesperson"—now you’re the "mediocre regional director."
How the Peter Principle Book Redefined "Success"
When Peter and Hull first pitched the manuscript, it was rejected about thirty times. Publishers thought it was too cynical or maybe just a joke. They weren't entirely wrong about the joke part; the book is written with a heavy dose of satire. But the satire masks a terrifyingly accurate observation of human systems. Peter wasn't just complaining about his boss. He was looking at how systems inevitably clog themselves with people who can't do the work they've been assigned.
Most people assume that "incompetence" in this context means being a total failure. It doesn't. In the world of The Peter Principle book, incompetence just means you’ve reached the limit of your specific skill set.
A brilliant surgeon might have zero aptitude for hospital administration. However, the system only knows how to reward a "good surgeon" by making them an "administrator." This is what Peter calls "The Peter Plateau." It's where the work stops getting done.
Why the logic is so hard to escape
The math is actually pretty brutal. If you are competent, you get promoted. If you are incompetent, you don't. Therefore, the only way to stop being promoted is to become incompetent. It’s a dead end. Eventually, every position in a large organization is held by someone who can't actually do the job.
Peter argues that most of the actual work in the world is being done by people who haven't reached their level of incompetence yet. It’s a race against time.
📖 Related: What's the Price of Silver Today Per Ounce: The Real Story Behind the $90 Breakout
Real-World Evidence That Peter Was Right
For decades, people treated this as a funny observation rather than a scientific law. But in 2018, a massive study actually backed it up. Researchers Alan Benson, Danielle Li, and Shai Siegelman analyzed sales data from over 200 firms. They found that the best salespeople were indeed the ones most likely to be promoted to manager.
The kicker? These top performers turned out to be the worst managers.
Promoting based on current performance rather than future potential actually cost companies money. It's a double whammy: you lose your best "doer" and gain a terrible "leader."
The "Creative Incompetence" Strategy
One of the funniest and most practical parts of The Peter Principle book is the idea of Creative Incompetence. Peter suggests that if you love your job and don't want to be promoted into a role you’ll hate, you have to find a way to stay "incompetent" in small, harmless ways.
- Wear mismatched socks.
- Occasionally park in the CEO's spot by "accident."
- Be slightly bad at filing expenses.
The goal is to keep your boss thinking, "They’re great at their job, but they just aren't management material." It sounds crazy, but it’s a survival tactic. It keeps you in the "Zone of Competence."
Hierarchiology: The Science of Stagnation
Peter coined the term "hierarchiology" to describe the study of these systems. He notes that once a company reaches a certain size, it stops being about the product and starts being about the hierarchy itself. This leads to things like "Professional Automatism." This is when an employee cares more about the rules than the results.
Have you ever dealt with a government office or a massive bank where the person behind the counter says, "I know this makes no sense, but it's the policy"? That’s a Peter Principle symptom. The person has stopped thinking because thinking is a "competence" that might lead to more responsibility.
The different types of promotions
Peter identifies several ways people move around without actually being competent.
- The Percussive Sublimation: This is when a total failure is "kicked upstairs." They get a fancy title and a big office just to get them out of the way of the people actually doing the work.
- The Lateral Arabesque: Shuffling an incompetent person to a different department so they become someone else's problem.
- The Pull vs. The Push: Peter notes that "Pull" (who you know) is usually faster than "Push" (how hard you work) for climbing the ladder.
Why We Can't Just Stop Promoting People
You’d think the solution would be simple: just don't promote the good workers. But it’s not that easy. In our culture, "staying in the same place" is seen as failure. If you've been a software engineer for 15 years and haven't become a Lead or a Manager, people ask what’s wrong with you.
The hierarchy demands growth. Even if that growth leads to a cliff.
Also, for many, a promotion is the only way to get a raise. Companies have tied "more money" to "more authority." This forces people to chase roles they aren't suited for just so they can pay their mortgage. Until we decouple compensation from management, The Peter Principle book will remain a prophecy.
Applying Peter's Lessons to Your Own Career
So, what do you actually do with this? If you’re an employee, you need to be brutally honest about your own limits. Just because you're the best graphic designer in the building doesn't mean you'll be happy managing the design team. Management is a completely different craft. It requires empathy, organization, and a tolerance for meetings that "could have been an email." If those aren't your strengths, a promotion is just a trap.
If you’re a leader, you have to stop using promotions as prizes.
- Create "Individual Contributor" tracks where people can earn more without managing others.
- Test people for the new skills required, not the ones they already mastered.
- Value the "competent" workers enough to let them stay where they are.
How to avoid the "Final Placement"
Peter calls the last job you'll ever have your "Final Placement." It’s the one where you finally stop being good. To avoid this, you have to practice self-awareness. Ask yourself: "Do I actually want the responsibilities of the next level, or do I just want the status?"
If it's just the status, you're heading for a plateau.
The Peter Principle book isn't just a relic of the 60s. It’s a warning. In a world obsessed with "leveling up," sometimes the smartest move is to stay exactly where you are and keep being excellent.
📖 Related: 165 Canadian to US: Why the Math Usually Feels Like a Rip-off
Actionable Next Steps
- Audit Your Career Path: List the skills required for the role immediately above yours. If more than 50% of them are things you actively dislike doing, do not pursue that promotion.
- Negotiate for "Level-Agnostic" Rewards: Next time you’re due for a performance review, ask for a salary increase or more vacation time in lieu of a title change that adds management responsibilities.
- Identify Your "Creative Incompetence": Find one low-stakes task that you can be "bad" at to signal that you are perfectly suited for your current role and don't need to be moved.
- Redesign Your Team’s Growth: If you manage people, create a "Mastery Track" that allows specialists to gain prestige and pay without needing to manage a single person.