You’ve probably heard the story by now. Two strangers walk into a lab, sit face-to-face, and ask each other a series of increasingly personal questions. Then, they stare into each other's eyes for four minutes in total silence. It sounds like a scene from a quirky indie movie or a high-stakes social experiment. Honestly, it was a bit of both.
The New York Times 36 questions that lead to love became a global phenomenon back in 2015 when Mandy Len Catron wrote her "Modern Love" essay about trying them out herself. But here’s the thing: the questions weren't actually designed to make people fall in love. Not exactly. They were created decades earlier by psychologist Arthur Aron at Stony Brook University. His goal? To see if he could jumpstart "interpersonal closeness" in a controlled laboratory setting. He succeeded. He succeeded so well that one of the original pairs of strangers in his study actually ended up getting married six months later.
The Science of Vulnerability
Most people think love is this mystical, lightning-bolt moment that just happens to you. It's romantic, sure, but it's not very practical. Aron’s research suggests that closeness is actually a byproduct of "sustained, escalating, reciprocal, personal self-disclosure." That’s a mouthful. Basically, it means you tell me a secret, I tell you a secret, and we keep going until we're both a little bit uncomfortable but a lot more connected.
The structure of the New York Times 36 questions that lead to love is brilliant because it removes the "small talk" barrier. We spend so much of our lives stuck in the "What do you do for work?" or "How 'bout this weather?" phase of human interaction. It’s safe. It’s also incredibly boring. These questions act as a fast-forward button. You start with light stuff, like your dream dinner guest, and by the end, you're discussing your relationship with your mother and when you last cried in front of another person. It forces a level of intimacy that might otherwise take months—or years—to achieve naturally.
How the 36 Questions are Broken Down
The list isn't just a random pile of inquiries. It’s divided into three distinct sets. Each set is designed to peel back another layer of your psyche.
Set I: The Icebreakers
In the beginning, things are relatively chill. You’re asked about fame and what a "perfect day" looks like. It's easy. It’s fun. But even here, there’s a trap. Question 10 asks you to share what you’d change about the way you were raised. Suddenly, you aren’t just talking about dinner guests; you’re talking about your childhood.
✨ Don't miss: How to Sign Someone Up for Scientology: What Actually Happens and What You Need to Know
Set II: Digging Deeper
This is where the shift happens. You start talking about your greatest accomplishments and your most terrible memories. This set introduces the idea of "reciprocal sharing." You’re not just answering; you’re building a shared history of information. You start to see how the other person processes pain and success.
Set III: The Vulnerability Peak
By the time you hit the final set, the gloves are off. You’re sharing things you like about the person sitting across from you—things you just met them for. You’re talking about death. You’re talking about family secrets. This is where the "closeness" happens. You’ve created a "we" instead of just an "I" and a "you."
Does It Actually Lead to Marriage?
Let’s be real for a second. Asking these questions isn't a magic spell. You can't just grab a random person off the street, run through the list, and expect to be picking out engagement rings by Tuesday. The "Modern Love" essay worked because there was already a baseline of attraction between Mandy Len Catron and her acquaintance.
The questions create intimacy, but they don't create compatibility. If you find out your partner’s deepest, darkest secret is something you find morally reprehensible, the questions won't make you love them. They might actually make you leave them faster. And that’s okay. The value of the New York Times 36 questions that lead to love isn't just in creating romance; it’s in accelerating the process of knowing someone. It saves time.
I’ve seen people use these on tenth anniversaries. I’ve seen them used by estranged siblings. The results are usually the same: a profound sense of being seen. In a world where we mostly interact through filtered photos and curated status updates, being forced to give an honest answer to "If you were to die this evening with no opportunity to communicate with anyone, what would you most regret not having told someone?" is a heavy, beautiful thing.
🔗 Read more: Wire brush for cleaning: What most people get wrong about choosing the right bristles
Why the Four-Minute Stare Matters
After the questions are done, the experiment concludes with four minutes of silent eye contact. This is arguably the most terrifying part of the whole ordeal. Why? Because you can’t hide. You’ve just spent an hour or two spilling your soul, and now you have to just be with that person.
Psychologically, prolonged eye contact triggers the release of phenylethylamine, a chemical associated with feelings of attraction and "lust." It also fosters a sense of trust. It’s incredibly intimate. Most of us only look at people for a few seconds before glancing away. Holding that gaze for four minutes feels like an eternity. It’s the final bridge between "knowing" and "feeling."
Misconceptions and Reality Checks
People often get hung up on the "lead to love" part of the title. It’s catchy. It sells papers. But Dr. Aron himself has noted that the study was about closeness, not necessarily romantic love. The "love" part is the marketing. The "closeness" part is the science.
- You don't have to do it with a stranger. In fact, doing it with a long-term partner can be even more intense.
- It’s not a test. There are no right or wrong answers. If you try to "win" the questions, you've already lost the point.
- Context matters. Doing this in a noisy bar is a bad idea. You need a quiet space where you won't be interrupted.
Actionable Steps to Try It Yourself
If you're actually going to do this, don't just wing it. Treat it with a bit of respect. It’s essentially a DIY therapy session for two.
1. Pick the right partner.
It doesn't have to be a date. Try it with a best friend or even a parent. Just make sure it’s someone you actually want to be closer to.
💡 You might also like: Images of Thanksgiving Holiday: What Most People Get Wrong
2. Set aside at least two hours.
Don't rush. If a question sparks a long conversation, let it happen. The questions are the map, but the conversation is the journey.
3. Be brutally honest.
If you give "safe" answers, you’ll get a "safe" (and shallow) result. The magic is in the vulnerability. If you feel a little bit embarrassed by your answer, you’re probably doing it right.
4. Don't skip the stare.
It’s awkward. Your eyes will probably water. You’ll want to laugh or look away. Don't. Lean into the discomfort. Set a timer and just look.
5. Follow up.
Closeness is a muscle. You can't work it out once and expect to stay fit forever. Use the momentum from the questions to change how you communicate daily. Start asking "Level 2" questions in your regular life instead of just sticking to the surface.
The New York Times 36 questions that lead to love aren't a shortcut to a wedding, but they are a shortcut to the kind of depth that makes a relationship worth having. Whether you end up in love or just deeply moved, you’ll walk away knowing another human being better than most people ever will. And in 2026, when everyone is more connected to their phones than each other, that’s a pretty big win.