When Umberto Eco dropped The Name of the Rose in 1980, nobody expected a 500-page semiotic thriller about 14th-century monks to become a global obsession. It shouldn't have worked. Honestly, a book packed with Latin snippets, dense debates on the poverty of Christ, and architectural theory sounds like a snooze fest. But it wasn't. It became a massive hit because, at its heart, it’s a grisly Sherlock Holmes-style slasher set in a labyrinthine Italian monastery.
People are still obsessed with it. Whether you’re coming to it through the original novel, the 1986 Sean Connery flick, or the more recent 2019 miniseries, the story sticks. It’s about the power of books, the danger of laughter, and how easily "truth" gets twisted by those in charge. It's a vibe. A dark, foggy, medieval vibe.
What Actually Happens in The Name of the Rose?
The setup is basically a "locked-room" mystery, except the room is a massive, fortified abbey in Northern Italy. We follow William of Baskerville—a Franciscan friar with a sharp mind and a shady past as an inquisitor—and his young novice, Adso of Melk. They arrive at the abbey for a high-stakes theological debate, but things go south immediately. Monks start turning up dead in weird ways. One is found in a vat of pig's blood. Another is stuffed into a jar.
William isn't just looking for a killer; he’s navigating a political minefield. You've got the Pope in Avignon battling the Holy Roman Emperor, and this abbey is the neutral ground where their representatives are supposed to meet. The monks are terrified, the Abbot is hiding something, and the library—the greatest in Christendom—is strictly off-limits.
It's a labyrinth. Literally. The library is a maze designed to keep people out. William uses logic and semiotics (the study of signs) to track the killer, but he’s fighting against a world that prefers superstition. To the monks, the deaths are signs of the Apocalypse. To William, they're clues.
The Mystery of the Missing Book
The whole plot hinges on a "lost" book: the second volume of Aristotle's Poetics, which supposedly deals with comedy and laughter. In the world of The Name of the Rose, laughter is dangerous. If people can laugh at everything, they might laugh at God. They might lose their fear. And without fear, the Church loses its grip.
💡 You might also like: Why Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy Actors Still Define the Modern Spy Thriller
Jorge of Burgos, the blind, ancient monk who serves as the story’s unofficial antagonist, hates laughter. He thinks it's a pagan corruption. He’s gone to lethal lengths to make sure nobody ever reads that book. It’s a wild concept: a book so "toxic" that just touching it can kill you. Eco wasn't just being dramatic here; he was making a point about censorship and how far institutions will go to protect their monopoly on "The Truth."
Why the Title Still Confuses Everyone
If you finish the book or the movie and wonder, "Wait, what rose?" you aren't alone. The title The Name of the Rose is famously cryptic. Eco himself said he chose it because the rose is a figure so rich in different meanings that it has almost no meaning left. It's a "symbolic overkill."
The last line of the book is a Latin hexameter: stat rosa pristina nomine, nomina nuda tenemus.
Roughly translated, it means "the rose of old exists only in its name; we hold only naked names." It's a nod to Nominalism. Basically, it suggests that when things disappear—like the abbey, the library, or the people we love—all we have left are the words we use to describe them. The physical thing is gone, but the name survives. It’s kinda poetic, kinda depressing. It mirrors how the great library burns down at the end, leaving Adso with nothing but fragments and memories.
The Sean Connery Factor and the 1986 Film
We have to talk about the movie. Jean-Jacques Annaud directed the 1986 adaptation, and it’s a masterpiece of "ugly" realism. Unlike many Hollywood medieval movies where everyone has perfect teeth, this film is gritty. It’s dirty. You can practically smell the wet stone and unwashed wool.
📖 Related: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
Sean Connery was actually considered "box office poison" at the time. Hard to believe, right? But his performance as William of Baskerville saved his career. He brought a weary, intellectual weight to the role. Christian Slater, as the young Adso, provided the audience's point of entry into this weird, claustrophobic world.
The film strips away a lot of the dense philosophy of the book to focus on the "whodunnit" aspect. It works. It’s a tight, atmospheric thriller that actually managed to capture the scale of the Aedificium (the library tower) without modern CGI. They built a massive set in Rome that remains one of the largest ever constructed in Europe.
The 2019 Miniseries: A Different Beast
If the movie was a condensed version, the 2019 TV series starring John Turturro is the "long-form" expansion. With eight episodes, it has time to breathe. It dives deeper into the political subplots—the stuff about the Dulcinian heretics and the complex beef between the Franciscans and the Papal legates.
Turturro plays William with a bit more eccentricity than Connery. It’s less "action-hero monk" and more "obsessive detective." While it didn't have the same cultural impact as the film, it’s actually a more faithful representation of Eco’s sprawling narrative. It shows that The Name of the Rose isn't just a story you tell once; it’s a world you inhabit.
Real History vs. Fiction: What Eco Got Right
Umberto Eco was a medievalist first and a novelist second. He didn't just "make up" the setting. He based the abbey on the Sacra di San Michele in the Susa Valley of Piedmont, Italy. If you look at photos of that place, it’s terrifyingly beautiful—perched on a mountain peak, looking down over the world.
👉 See also: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
- The Inquisitors: Bernard Gui was a real guy. He was a notorious Dominican inquisitor and wrote the Manual of the Inquisitor. In the story, he’s the heavy. In real life, he was just as relentless, though he probably wasn't quite the cartoon villain he's sometimes portrayed as.
- The Poverty Debate: This sounds boring, but in the 1300s, people literally died over the question of whether Jesus owned his own clothes. The Franciscans argued for "apostolic poverty," while the Pope—living in luxury—found that idea threatening. The Name of the Rose uses this real historical tension to drive the plot.
- The Library: While the specific "Great Library" is fictional, medieval monasteries were the primary keepers of knowledge in Europe. They were the only reason many Greek and Roman texts survived the Dark Ages.
Why You Should Care Today
You might think a story about 14th-century monks has nothing to do with 2026. You’d be wrong. The Name of the Rose is fundamentally about information. Who gets to see it? Who gets to hide it? How do we know what is "fake news" and what is "fact"?
William of Baskerville is essentially a scientist in a world that hates science. He uses observation. He looks at footprints in the snow. He looks at the way light hits a pair of glasses. He's trying to find the truth in a sea of dogma. Today, we’re drowning in information, but we still struggle with the same things: echo chambers, "forbidden" knowledge, and people who want to burn the library down because they don't like what's inside.
How to Experience the Story Now
If you want to dive in, don't start with the most difficult path unless you're feeling brave.
- Watch the 1986 Movie: It’s the easiest entry point. It captures the atmosphere perfectly and the mystery is satisfying.
- Read the Book (With Help): If you pick up the novel, don't feel bad about skimming the 20-page descriptions of church doors. Eco is showing off. Focus on the dialogue between William and Adso.
- Visit the Locations: If you’re ever in Italy, visit the Sacra di San Michele. Standing in that wind-swept stone fortress makes the whole story feel incredibly real.
- Listen to the Audiobook: Some of the Latin and complex names are easier to digest when a professional narrator handles the pronunciation.
The "rose" might just be a name, but the story is a juggernaut. It’s a reminder that even in the darkest, most superstitious times, the human mind—and its desire to laugh and learn—can't be kept in the dark forever.
Take Action: If you’re a fan of mystery, go back and watch the 1986 film first to get the visuals in your head, then tackle the book. Pay close attention to the character of Jorge; he’s a chilling reminder of what happens when someone believes their version of the truth is the only one allowed to exist. Check your local library or streaming services for the 2019 series if you want the deep-lore experience.