You’re running up the spiral wooden path in Tall, Tall Mountain. The music is jaunty, the scale is dizzying, and then you see him—Ukiki. Most players remember this monkey for stealing Mario’s hat, a mechanic that felt genuinely stressful in 1996. But for a specific corner of the internet, the real mystery of the monkey cage Mario 64 isn’t about the hat at all. It’s about a specific, empty cage dangling near the waterfall and the decades of rumors that suggest it was meant for something much bigger than a single Power Star.
Honestly, it’s weird.
If you look at the geometry of Tall, Tall Mountain, the cage feels like a centerpiece. It’s a physical object with collision, dangling right there in the open air, yet its only purpose in the final retail version of the game is to hold a Star that Ukiki "releases" after you catch him. But for years, rumors swirled that Luigi was trapped in there. Or that a second monkey existed. Or that the cage was a remnant of a much more complex mission structure that Nintendo hacked away at the last second to meet their launch deadline.
What’s Actually Going On With That Cage?
Let's get the facts straight first. In the mission "Mysterious Mountainside," you find the cage. It’s empty. You grab the monkey, he leads you to it, he jumps on top, and boom—the cage shatters or opens, and the Star is yours.
Simple, right? Not really.
The mystery of the monkey cage Mario 64 stems from how the game handles that specific object. In the 1995 Spaceworld demo and early B-roll footage, the "Tall, Tall Mountain" level looked significantly different. We know from the massive "Gigaleak" in 2020 that Super Mario 64 went through dozens of iterations. When fans started digging through the leaked source code, they found evidence of assets that didn’t make the cut. While a "Luigi in the cage" model wasn't just sitting there waiting to be found, the code for the cage itself is surprisingly unique compared to other breakable objects in the game.
It’s a "special" object.
✨ Don't miss: Finding Every Bubbul Gem: Why the Map of Caves TOTK Actually Matters
Most breakable crates or containers in Mario 64 use a standard script. The monkey cage, however, is tied specifically to the NPC behavior of Ukiki. If you use cheats to reach the cage without the monkey, nothing happens. It’s an unresponsive box. This binary state—completely useless or mission-critical—is what fueled the early 2000s playground rumors. Kids would swear that if you brought the owl from the beginning of the level to the cage, or if you performed a precise frame-perfect dive, you could see a shadow inside.
They were wrong, of course. But they were onto something regarding the game's development.
The Luigi Connection and the L is Real 2401 Myth
You can't talk about the mystery of the monkey cage Mario 64 without mentioning the "L is Real 2401" plaque in the castle courtyard. For years, players tried to link the two. The theory was that the "2401" referred to a total coin count or a specific time limit that would unlock the cage on the mountain, finally freeing Mario’s brother.
It sounds silly now.
But back then, without a central wiki or YouTube to debunk things, these theories were gospel. When the 2020 leaks actually confirmed that a Luigi model did exist in the game’s files at some point, it felt like a collective vindication for every kid who spent five hours staring at that monkey cage. It turns out that the cage might have been one of the testing grounds for character-based triggers.
Think about it. If you were going to hide a second playable character, a cage at the top of a mountain is the most Nintendo trope imaginable.
🔗 Read more: Playing A Link to the Past Switch: Why It Still Hits Different Today
Technical Oddities: Why the Cage Acts So Strange
The way the cage breaks is also a bit of a technical anomaly. In most of Super Mario 64, when an object breaks, it spawns particles and the item inside simply appears. The cage has a specific "falling" animation and a trigger that checks for the monkey's presence.
If you look at the "Star 2" mission logic, the game is constantly checking the distance between Mario, Ukiki, and that cage. This is heavy lifting for the N64's limited RAM. Why put so much effort into a single-use asset for one of the later levels?
- The cage uses a specific "env_map" texture in some versions that looks slightly more metallic than other wooden assets.
- The collision box is slightly larger than the visual model, leading to "clipping" issues that hunters used to claim were "ghosts."
- The cage is technically an "enemy" entity in some code strings, meaning it can be "defeated" by the monkey's script.
This clunky programming is a hallmark of a rushed development phase. Tall, Tall Mountain is often cited by speedrunners and historians as a level that feels "condensed." The mysterious cage is a remnant of that condensation. It’s a goalpost moved from a much longer, more complex race or puzzle.
The "Second Monkey" Theory
Some players swear there was a second monkey. Not the one that steals your hat, and not the one that opens the cage, but a third one that appeared only in the Japanese Shindou version or early cartridges.
This is actually a half-truth.
There are two monkeys on the mountain, but they are often confused because they look identical. One hangs out near the waterfall; the other is further up. The mystery of the monkey cage Mario 64 is often complicated by players catching the "wrong" monkey and wondering why the cage won't open. It's a classic case of player error being interpreted as a secret.
💡 You might also like: Plants vs Zombies Xbox One: Why Garden Warfare Still Slaps Years Later
However, data miners have found unused dialogue strings that suggest the monkeys had a more antagonistic relationship. Early drafts of the script had them fighting over the "shiny thing" in the cage. In the final game, the monkey you catch is surprisingly cooperative once you grab him. He just sighs and walks you to the Star. It’s a bit of an anti-climax for such a prominent set piece.
Beyond the Mountain: Legacy of the Mystery
Why do we still care about a low-poly cage from 1996?
Because Super Mario 64 was the first time we felt like a 3D world could have secrets we weren't "supposed" to find. The cage represents the era of "Beta hunting." We look at it and see the "Personalized AI" creepypastas or the "Every Copy of Mario 64 is Personalized" memes. The cage is the perfect vessel for these stories because it’s a container. And a container, by definition, is supposed to hold something.
When it's empty, our brains want to fill it.
How to Explore the Cage Yourself Today
If you want to poke at the mystery of the monkey cage Mario 64, you don't need a time machine. You can actually see the weirdness yourself with a few modern tools.
- Use a Fly Cam: If you use the PC Port (SM64EX) or an emulator with a free-look camera, zoom inside the cage before catching Ukiki. You’ll see it’s truly empty—no hidden textures, no 2D sprites of Luigi.
- Check the "Object Specs": If you're into the technical side, look at the object ID for the cage. It shares properties with the "Rolling Log" and the "Large Crate," which is why it feels so "heavy" when you jump on it.
- The Shindou Difference: Play the Shindou version (the one included in 3D All-Stars). Notice the rumble feedback when the cage hits the ground. It’s a small detail, but it shows Nintendo was still tweaking this specific interaction after the initial US/Japan launch.
The cage isn't a gateway to a secret level. It isn't the prison cell of a lost brother. It’s a brilliantly placed piece of environmental storytelling that was likely simplified due to the hardware constraints of the Nintendo 64.
The real magic isn't in what's inside the cage, but in the fact that millions of people looked at an empty box and saw a world of possibilities. That is the ultimate testament to Miyamoto's design. Even the "mistakes" or the "rushed" parts of the game feel like they’re part of a deeper, unreachable lore.
If you’re still curious about the technical leftovers of this era, your next step should be looking into the "Blargg" files in the Super Mario 64 source code. While the cage was a mystery of what wasn't there, Blargg is a mystery of a fully functional enemy that was cut for almost no reason at all, despite being completely finished. Go find the "L is Real" documentary on YouTube; it’s a three-hour deep dive that actually uses the leaked source code to prove what was real and what was just playground talk.