Wall Street is eating the world. That’s the basic, slightly terrifying premise of Rana Foroohar’s Makers and Takers book. It’s been out for a while now, but if you look at how corporations behave today, her warnings feel less like a "financial critique" and more like a map of the mess we’re currently living in.
She calls it "financialization."
It’s a clunky word for a simple, destructive idea: the shift from making things to moving money around. We used to have a system where finance served business. Now, business serves finance. It’s a complete reversal of how a healthy economy is supposed to function.
What is the Makers and Takers Book Really About?
Honestly, the subtitle says it all: The Rise of Finance and the Fall of American Business. Foroohar, who is a heavy-hitter at the Financial Times and CNN, didn’t just write this to complain about high interest rates. She wrote it to show how the "takers"—the folks who profit from trading, debt, and financial engineering—have started to choke out the "makers," the people actually building products, innovating, and providing services.
The book argues that only about 15% of the money flowing through the financial system actually makes its way into the "real economy." The rest? It just stays in a closed loop of banks, hedge funds, and investment firms. They’re basically just trading pieces of paper back and forth to make themselves richer while the rest of the world struggles to get a small business loan.
It’s a massive drain on productivity.
Think about it this way. If you’re a CEO and you have $100 million, you have two choices. You can invest it in R&D to make a better battery, or you can use it to buy back your own stock to juice the share price and get a bigger bonus. One helps the world. One helps the "takers." Guess which one happens more often?
✨ Don't miss: Getting a Mortgage on a 300k Home Without Overpaying
The Stock Buyback Trap
Foroohar spends a lot of time on stock buybacks. They’re kind of the smoking gun of the Makers and Takers book. Before the early 1980s, buybacks were mostly illegal because they were considered a form of market manipulation. Then the SEC changed the rules (Rule 10b-18, if you’re a nerd for regulation).
Since then, it’s been open season.
Instead of raising wages or building new factories, companies spend trillions—yes, trillions with a 'T'—buying their own shares. It’s a sugar high. It makes the company look more valuable on paper without them actually doing anything better. Foroohar uses Apple as a prime example. Even a company that’s famous for making cool gadgets started spending more on buybacks and dividends than on the actual innovation that made them famous in the first place.
It’s a short-term game that ruins long-term stability. You can’t innovate if all your cash is being funneled to Wall Street.
Why Small Businesses Get Screwed
The financial system was originally built to take people’s savings and lend them to businesses that needed to grow. That’s the "maker" side of finance. But as the Makers and Takers book points out, that’s not what banks do anymore.
Most of what big banks do now is lend money for "existing assets." That means mortgages for houses that are already built or loans for mergers and acquisitions. They aren't funding the next great American invention; they’re just betting on things that already exist. This makes it incredibly hard for actual entrepreneurs to get capital. If you aren't a massive corporation with a lobbyist in D.C., you're basically an afterthought to the big banks.
🔗 Read more: Class A Berkshire Hathaway Stock Price: Why $740,000 Is Only Half the Story
The Myth of Efficient Markets
We’ve been told for decades that the market is always right. If the stock market is up, the economy is great, right? Wrong.
Foroohar deconstructs this myth with a lot of precision. She looks at how "financialized" thinking has even infected the way we run hospitals and schools. When you treat a hospital like a hedge fund, you get "efficiency" that results in fewer nurses and worse patient care, all so the private equity owners can extract their "take."
It’s a predatory mindset.
The book isn't just a dry economic text. It’s a series of stories about real people and real companies that have been hollowed out by this philosophy. She talks about the "financial-industrial complex" and how it has captured both political parties. It doesn't matter who is in the White House; the "takers" always seem to have a seat at the table.
Is There a Way Out?
Foroohar doesn’t just leave you depressed. She does offer some paths forward, though they aren't easy.
- Tax Reform: We need to stop rewarding debt. Right now, companies can deduct interest on debt from their taxes, which encourages them to load up on loans instead of using their own cash.
- Simplifying the System: The financial world is intentionally complicated. Complexity is a feature, not a bug—it’s how they hide the fees. Bringing back things like the Glass-Steagall Act (separating boring commercial banking from risky investment banking) would be a start.
- Changing CEO Pay: If you pay people based on short-term stock prices, they will do whatever it takes to make that number go up, even if it kills the company in five years. We need a system that rewards long-term health.
The Reality Check
Look, some people criticize the Makers and Takers book by saying it’s too hard on finance. They argue that we need deep liquidity and complex markets to keep a global economy running. And sure, finance isn’t inherently evil. We need banks. We need capital.
💡 You might also like: Getting a music business degree online: What most people get wrong about the industry
But there’s a massive difference between a heart that pumps blood to the rest of the body and a heart that decides it wants to keep all the blood for itself. That’s what Foroohar is arguing has happened. The heart (finance) is now bigger than the body (the real economy), and that’s not sustainable.
Putting the Ideas into Action
You don't have to be a policy wonk to take some lessons from this. If you're an investor, look for "makers." Look for companies that actually have high R&D spending compared to their buybacks. Look for businesses that treat their employees like assets rather than expenses to be "minimized."
If you're a business owner, be wary of the siren song of "financial engineering." It’s tempting to take the easy money or use debt to fuel growth, but as this book shows, that often leads to a hollowed-out version of what you originally built.
Next Steps for Readers:
- Check the "Buyback Ratio": Before investing in a major stock, look up how much they spent on share buybacks versus Research and Development (R&D) over the last three years.
- Support Community Banks: Local credit unions and small banks are much more likely to lend to the "maker" economy than the "too big to fail" institutions.
- Audit Your Own Business Philosophy: If you run a team, ask yourself if your KPIs are measuring actual value creation or just "paper" metrics that look good in a quarterly report but don't mean much for the long-term mission.
The Makers and Takers book is a wake-up call. It's about realizing that a society that values the "trade" more than the "make" is a society on a collision course with reality. We're seeing those cracks now in everything from our crumbling infrastructure to the widening wealth gap. Understanding the difference between a maker and a taker isn't just about economics; it's about deciding what kind of world we actually want to build.