He screamed at the trees. He spoke until foam bubbled at the corners of his mouth. He even, according to some terrified courtiers, mistook an oak tree for the King of Prussia and tried to have a polite conversation with it. For centuries, the story of the madness of King George III has been boiled down to a caricature of a man in a nightshirt losing his mind while losing the American colonies. It's a convenient narrative. It makes for great theater. But honestly? The reality of what happened inside the walls of Kew Palace is way more complicated—and significantly more tragic—than the "crazy king" tropes suggest.
George III wasn't just some eccentric royal who woke up one day and decided to talk to the flora. He was a deeply cultured, highly intellectual man who reigned for 59 years. Yet, we remember him for the purple urine and the straightjackets. To understand the madness of King George, you have to look past the Hamilton version of history and dive into the brutal medical reality of the 18th century.
The Royal Malady: Arsenic, Porphyria, or Something Else?
For a long time, the medical community thought they had this one figured out. In the 1960s, a mother-son psychiatrist team, Ida Macalpine and Richard Hunter, put forward a theory that became the gold standard for decades. They argued that George suffered from porphyria.
Basically, porphyria is a rare genetic blood disorder. It can cause excruciating abdominal pain, limb weakness, and, most famously, blue or purple-colored urine. It sounds like a perfect fit, right? The theory explained the physical symptoms and the mental breaks. It even suggested that the "madness" was just a side effect of a metabolic crisis.
But modern science is kinda skeptical now.
Researchers at St George's, University of London, led by Peter Garrard, used computerized language analysis on the King’s letters. They found that during his episodes of "madness," his sentence structure became incredibly complex and repetitive—a hallmark of the manic phase of bipolar disorder.
Then there’s the hair.
👉 See also: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
In 2005, a study published in The Lancet analyzed a sample of George III’s hair and found massive levels of arsenic. Where did it come from? Probably his medicine. The doctors of the era were essentially poisoning him with antimony to try and cure him. The arsenic was a contaminant in the antimony. So, even if he did have a genetic predisposition to illness, his doctors were likely making it ten times worse with every dose they forced down his throat. It’s a bit of a "which came first" situation. Was he mad because of his brain chemistry, or was he driven into a toxic delirium by the people trying to save him?
Life Inside the "Madhouse" at Kew
Imagine being the most powerful man in Britain and suddenly being treated like a dangerous animal. When the madness of King George took hold, the Royal family's life didn't just stop; it turned into a nightmare of secrecy and primitive "cures."
The King was often moved to Kew Palace, away from the prying eyes of London. This wasn't a relaxing getaway.
His doctors, including the infamous Francis Willis, believed in a "broken will" approach. If the King was unruly, he was stuffed into a straightjacket. If he wouldn't stop talking, he was gagged. Willis was a clergyman turned doctor who ran a private asylum in Lincolnshire, and he treated the King with a mix of intimidation and physical restraint.
"The King’s condition was such that he had to be kept in a strait-waistcoat for several hours a day." - An account from the diaries of Fanny Burney, a lady-in-waiting to Queen Charlotte.
Fanny Burney’s journals are actually one of our best windows into this period. She describes heart-wrenching scenes of the King chasing her through the gardens at Kew, desperate for someone to talk to, while his doctors tried to restrain him. He wasn't violent in a "horror movie" way. He was just... lost. He was a man who loved his wife, Charlotte, and his fifteen children, but during his fits, he became a stranger to them.
✨ Don't miss: Curtain Bangs on Fine Hair: Why Yours Probably Look Flat and How to Fix It
The social stigma was huge. Back then, mental illness was seen as a moral failing or a sign of weakness. The Queen was terrified. The Prince of Wales—the future George IV—was basically circling like a vulture, waiting to take over as Regent. It was a mess.
Why the Madness of King George Changed History
If George III had been a healthy, stable monarch in the 1770s, would the American Revolution have played out differently? Maybe. Maybe not.
Most historians agree that while the King's illness was a massive internal crisis for the British government, it wasn't the sole reason for the loss of the colonies. However, the madness of King George created a power vacuum. When the King was incapacitated, the government struggled to make firm decisions.
It also changed how the British public viewed the monarchy.
Seeing the King as a vulnerable, suffering human being actually earned him a weird kind of sympathy later in his life. People moved from mocking him to pitying him. He became "Farmer George," a grandfatherly figure who had lost his sight and his mind but remained a symbol of the nation during the Napoleonic Wars.
The Regency Act of 1811 finally made his son the de facto ruler. George III spent his final decade locked away in Windsor Castle, blind, deaf, and largely unaware that he had outlived his favorite daughter or that his wife had passed away. He lived in a world of his own making, playing the harpsichord and talking to people long dead.
🔗 Read more: Bates Nut Farm Woods Valley Road Valley Center CA: Why Everyone Still Goes After 100 Years
The Modern Takeaway
So, what can we actually learn from the madness of King George?
First, it’s a massive lesson in the evolution of medical ethics. We look back at Francis Willis and shudder, but at the time, his "moral treatment" was actually considered somewhat progressive compared to the literal chains used in other asylums. It’s a reminder that today’s "cutting-edge" medicine might be tomorrow’s cautionary tale.
Second, it highlights the danger of retrospective diagnosis. We want to put George in a neat little box—Porphyria! Bipolar! Chronic Lead Poisoning!—but the truth is likely a messy combination of all of them.
Actionable Insights for History Buffs and Researchers:
- Visit the Source: If you’re ever in London, go to Kew Palace. It’s preserved exactly as it was during the "madness" years. You can see the tiny, cramped rooms where the King was kept. It’s a sobering experience that strips away the glamour of royalty.
- Read the Primary Docs: Don't just take a historian's word for it. Look up the Diaries of Fanny Burney. Her first-hand accounts are visceral and far more human than any textbook.
- Question the "Mad" Label: When researching historical figures, look for the political motivations behind why they were called "mad." In George's case, his enemies used his illness to justify stripping him of power.
- Check the Science: If you're interested in the medical side, look up the 2005 Lancet study on his hair samples. It’s a fascinating look at how forensic science can rewrite history books.
The madness of King George wasn't a punchline. It was a long-term medical crisis that broke a family and reshaped an empire. By looking at the man behind the crown—the man who loved botany, music, and his family—we get a much clearer picture of a monarch who was doing his best while his own biology betrayed him.
Stay curious about the details. History is rarely as simple as the headlines make it out to be.
Next Steps for Deep Diving into the Hanoverian Era:
- Analyze the Regency Period: Research how the Prince Regent (George IV) changed British culture and architecture while his father was incapacitated.
- Investigate 18th Century Medicine: Compare the treatments given to King George with the standard practices at Bethlem Royal Hospital (Bedlam) during the same era.
- Explore Queen Charlotte’s Role: Look into how the Queen managed the household and the political fallout of the King's illness, which is a story of resilience in its own right.