The Little Flowers of St Francis: Why These 14th-Century Stories Still Feel So Real

The Little Flowers of St Francis: Why These 14th-Century Stories Still Feel So Real

You’ve probably seen the statues in suburban gardens. A thin man in a brown robe with a bird perched on his shoulder. He looks peaceful, maybe a little bit boring. But if you actually crack open The Little Flowers of St Francis, you realize the real story is way weirder—and much more intense—than a lawn ornament. It’s a collection of legends that reads like a mix of a medieval road trip movie and a mystical manifesto. Honestly, it’s some of the most human writing to come out of the Middle Ages.

The book isn't a biography in the modern sense. It’s more of a greatest hits album. Known in Latin as the Actus beati Francisci et sociorum eius, and later translated into the Italian Fioretti, these stories weren’t written by Francis himself. He had been dead for over a century by the time the version we know today really took flight in the late 1300s. It was a time of massive drama within the Franciscan order. Some guys wanted to own property and build big churches; others—the "Spirituals"—wanted to get back to the raw, radical poverty Francis actually preached. These stories were their weapon. They were saying, "Remember when we were actually wild?"


What Most People Get Wrong About the Wolf of Gubbio

If you know one story from The Little Flowers of St Francis, it’s the wolf. People love this story. In the tale, a massive, "terrible and fierce" wolf is terrorizing the city of Gubbio. It’s eating livestock. It’s eating people. The townsfolk are terrified.

Francis walks out to meet it. He doesn't bring a sword. He calls the wolf "Brother" and basically negotiates a peace treaty. He tells the wolf, "Look, I know you’re hungry, but you’ve got to stop the killing." Then he tells the townspeople, "You’ve got to feed this guy."

Modern readers often treat this like a cute Disney moment. It’s not. In the 14th-century mind, this was a political statement. It was about "re-wilding" the soul and finding peace through radical empathy, even for things that want to kill you. Scholars like Chiara Frugoni have pointed out that these stories were meant to show a different way of existing in a violent world. It wasn’t about being "nice." It was about being dangerously peaceful.

The Rough Reality of Early Franciscan Life

The book doesn't just focus on Francis. It spends a huge amount of time on his "flowers"—his followers. And man, these guys were characters. You’ve got Brother Juniper, who Francis famously said he wished he had a whole forest of. Juniper was... well, he was a lot.

One time, he saw a sick man who wanted a pig's trotter to eat. Juniper didn't ask questions. He went into a field, cut the foot off a living pig, and cooked it up. The owner of the pig was, understandably, livid. When Francis found out, he didn't give a theological lecture. He sent Juniper to apologize. Juniper was so "holy" in his simplicity that he ended up hugging the angry farmer, who then gave the rest of the pig to the friars.

It’s a bizarre, messy story. It’s also exactly why The Little Flowers of St Francis works. It admits that trying to live a life of perfect selflessness makes you look like a total lunatic to the rest of the world. The prose in the Fioretti captures this tension perfectly. One minute you’re reading about a divine vision of light, and the next, you’re reading about a friar getting kicked out of a house for being too annoying.

✨ Don't miss: Bed and Breakfast Wedding Venues: Why Smaller Might Actually Be Better

Why the "Perfect Joy" Story Is Brutal

There’s a section in Chapter 8 that basically summarizes the whole Franciscan vibe. Francis and Brother Leo are walking in the freezing cold. Leo asks, "What is perfect joy?"

Francis goes through a list of things that aren't perfect joy. Healing the blind? No. Knowing all the secrets of the universe? Nope. Converting everyone on earth? Still no.

He tells Leo that if they get to their destination, soaking wet and starving, and the porter doesn't recognize them—if he calls them thieves, beats them with a knotted stick, and leaves them in the snow—and if they endure that with patience and without grumbling? That is perfect joy.

It sounds masochistic. But for the people reading this in the 1300s, it was about reclaiming power. If the worst thing the world can do to you—beating you and rejecting you—doesn't break your inner peace, then you are finally, truly free. It’s a hardcore psychological shift.


The Mystery of the Authorship

Who actually wrote this? We don't have a single "Author" name like we do for a modern novel. The consensus among historians, including experts like Paul Sabatier (who basically launched modern Franciscan studies in the 1890s), is that the core stories come from Ugolino Brunforte.

Ugolino was a friar in the Marches of Ancona. This is important because the Marches were the "wild west" of the Franciscan movement. The friars there were the rebels. They didn't like the fancy new rules coming out of Rome. By writing down these "Flowers," they were trying to preserve the "true" Francis—the one who talked to birds and slept in the dirt—before he was sanitized by the official church history.

  1. The Latin Original: Actus beati Francisci (roughly 1327-1340).
  2. The Italian Translation: The Fioretti (late 14th century).
  3. The Global Spread: It wasn't until the 19th century that it became a worldwide "classic."

The Italian version is what survived because the language is so beautiful. It’s "vernacular" literature, meaning it was written for regular people, not just Latin-speaking scholars. It has a rhythm. It feels like a campfire story.

🔗 Read more: Virgo Love Horoscope for Today and Tomorrow: Why You Need to Stop Fixing People

Seeing the Divine in the Dirt

One of the most striking things about The Little Flowers of St Francis is how physical it is. Medieval spirituality is often thought of as "otherworldly," but these stories are obsessed with the earth. There are birds, fish, cicadas, fire, and cold stone.

When Francis preaches to the birds in Bevagna, he isn't just being a "nature lover." He’s acknowledging that they have a direct relationship with the Creator that doesn't involve humans. He tells them they should be grateful for their feathers and the air they fly in. It’s an early form of environmental ethics, though Francis wouldn't have called it that. He just saw everything as family.

This wasn't always popular. The Church was often wary of this kind of "pantheistic" leaning. But the Fioretti makes it feel so innocent and joyful that it’s hard to argue with.

The Stigmata and the Mountain of La Verna

The book ends (in most editions) with a series of "Considerations" on the Stigmata—the wounds of Christ that Francis allegedly received on his body. This is where the tone shifts. It gets darker, more mystical, and way more intense.

In 1224, on Mount La Verna, Francis is fasting. He sees a seraph—a six-winged angel—coming down from heaven. It’s a terrifying, brilliant sight. When the vision fades, he has holes in his hands and feet.

The Fioretti describes this not just as a miracle, but as a physical burden. He’s in pain. He has to hide the wounds. It’s a reminder that the "joy" Francis talks about isn't cheap. It costs everything. The writing here is vivid, almost cinematic. You can feel the wind on the mountain and the silence of the woods.


Why You Should Care in 2026

We live in a world that is obsessed with "more." More followers, more money, more security. The Little Flowers of St Francis is a 700-year-old middle finger to that entire way of life.

💡 You might also like: Lo que nadie te dice sobre la moda verano 2025 mujer y por qué tu armario va a cambiar por completo

It argues that the less you have, the more you actually see. It suggests that peace isn't the absence of conflict, but how you treat the "wolf" when it shows up at your door. Whether you're religious or not, there's a psychological weight to these stories that hits hard.

Honestly, the book is a vibe. It’s about a group of friends trying to do something impossible: live without ego. They fail constantly. They get muddy. They get yelled at. But they keep going.

Actionable Ways to Engage with the Text

If you want to actually "use" this book rather than just let it sit on a shelf, here are a few ways to approach it:

  • Read it out loud. These were meant to be spoken. The rhythm of the Italian (even in translation) comes alive when you hear it.
  • Focus on the "Minor" Friars. Don't just read the Francis parts. Look at Brother Masseo or Brother Bernard. Their struggles with pride and doubt are often more relatable than Francis's "perfect" holiness.
  • Visit the Geography. If you’re ever in Italy, go to the Marches or the Rieti Valley. Seeing the actual caves and forests where these stories take place changes everything. The scale is smaller and more intimate than you’d expect.
  • Compare Translations. Some older translations are very "thee and thou." Look for the E.M. Blaiklock version or the Penguin Classics translation for something that feels more like the original, gritty street-Italian.

The Fioretti isn't a museum piece. It’s a living document of what happens when people decide that human kindness is more important than human logic. It’s weird, it’s beautiful, and it’s still surprisingly relevant.

To dive deeper, start with the "Considerations on the Holy Stigmata" if you want the heavy mystical stuff, or stick to the first twenty chapters for the famous "nature" stories. Either way, stop looking at the garden statues and start reading the source material. It’s much more interesting.


Next Steps for Deepening Your Knowledge

To truly grasp the impact of the Fioretti, you should explore the historical context of the 14th-century Franciscan "Spirituals." Researching the life of Ugolino Brunforte will provide clarity on why these specific legends were preserved. Additionally, comparing the Little Flowers with the official biography by Bonaventure (Legenda Maior) reveals the fascinating tension between "authorized" history and the folk traditions that resonated most with the common people.