You’ve probably seen the headlines. Or maybe a concerned friend sent you a frantic text about your bathroom cabinet. Suddenly, that stinging, minty blast of Listerine doesn't just feel like "killing germs"—it feels like a gamble.
People are actually suing over this.
The Listerine class action lawsuit isn't about a bad taste or a broken bottle. It’s about the bacteria living in your mouth and a terrifying word no one wants to hear: cancer. Specifically, a major case filed in late 2024 by plaintiff Paige Vasseur alleges that regular use of Listerine Cool Mint Antiseptic might be doing more than just freshening your breath. It might be fueling the growth of "opportunistic" bacteria linked to colorectal and esophageal cancers.
Honestly, it’s a lot to take in when you’re just trying to pass a dental checkup.
The Science That Started the Fire
The whole legal battle basically hinges on a single study published in the Journal of Medical Microbiology in June 2024. Researchers in Belgium looked at 59 participants who used Listerine daily for three months. They found that two specific types of bacteria—Streptococcus anginosus and Fusobacterium nucleatum—became significantly more abundant.
Why does that matter?
👉 See also: The Stanford Prison Experiment Unlocking the Truth: What Most People Get Wrong
Because those two are the "bad guys" of the oral microbiome. F. nucleatum has been a red flag for researchers for years, often showing up in high concentrations in colorectal tumors. The lawsuit argues that by killing 99% of germs, Listerine isn't just killing the bad stuff; it’s nuking the "good" bacteria that keep these dangerous species in check.
It’s like clearing a forest and wondering why the weeds took over.
What the Lawsuit Actually Claims
Filed in a California federal court, the Listerine class action lawsuit (Vasseur v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. et al.) targets both J&J and Kenvue Inc. The core of the argument is simple: the companies didn't warn us.
The labels tell you to swish for 30 seconds, twice a day. They warn you not to swallow it. They tell you to keep it away from kids. But they definitely don't mention that it might alter your microbiome in a way that correlates with severe invasive infections or cancer.
The legal team, led by firms like Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, isn't necessarily saying Listerine gives you cancer directly. They are arguing "fraudulent concealment." Basically, they’re saying that if you knew your mouthwash was essentially an ecological disaster for your gums, you probably wouldn't have spent $8.99 on the big bottle. Or, at the very least, you’d want the choice to know the risks.
✨ Don't miss: In the Veins of the Drowning: The Dark Reality of Saltwater vs Freshwater
Does Listerine Really Cause Cancer?
This is where it gets messy.
If you ask Kenvue, the answer is a flat "no." They’ve pointed to over a century of peer-reviewed studies. They argue that Listerine is one of the most tested products in history. And they’re not entirely wrong. Many dentists still swear by it for patients with high-risk gingivitis.
Also, the Belgian study was small. 59 people isn't a massive clinical trial. Some experts, like Dr. Irene Grafman, have noted that while they might not recommend alcohol-based mouthwash, the "direct link" to cancer is still speculative.
The scientific community is split. Some say the ethanol (alcohol) in mouthwash breaks down into acetaldehyde, a known carcinogen. Others say the contact time is too short to matter. It's a classic "he-said, she-said" of the medical world, but with multi-million dollar legal fees on the line.
A History of Legal Headaches
This isn't the first time Listerine has been in the hot seat.
🔗 Read more: Whooping Cough Symptoms: Why It’s Way More Than Just a Bad Cold
- The "Total Care" Debacle: Back in 2011, J&J faced a suit over claims that Listerine Total Care could "restore enamel." The FDA stepped in, saying sodium fluoride doesn't work that way. That case was eventually tossed, but it set a precedent for people questioning the "miracle" claims on the label.
- The "Naturals" Fight: In 2021, another class action targeted "Listerine Naturals," alleging the ingredients were anything but natural.
- The 2025-2026 Landscape: As we sit here in 2026, the focus has shifted entirely to the microbiome. We are in the "Discovery Phase" for several of these newer filings. This means lawyers are currently digging through internal company emails to see what executives knew about the microbiome studies and when they knew it.
What Should You Do Now?
If you’re staring at a blue bottle of Cool Mint right now, don't panic. You don't need to throw it out, but you might want to rethink how you use it.
First, look at the ingredients. If "ethanol" or "alcohol" is at the top of the list, that’s the stuff currently under fire.
Many dental professionals are moving away from the "nuke everything" approach. They now suggest alcohol-free versions or "prebiotic" rinses that support the good bacteria. If you have a family history of oral or GI cancers, it’s worth a chat with your dentist.
As for the Listerine class action lawsuit, if you’ve been a regular user, keep your receipts. These cases take years to settle. If a settlement fund is eventually created, you’ll need proof of purchase to get your slice of the pie.
For now, the best move is to pay attention to your "oral garden." Your mouth isn't a sterile room; it's an ecosystem. Treat it like one.
Next Steps for Consumers:
Check your bottle for alcohol content immediately. If you prefer to avoid the risks mentioned in the current litigation, switch to an alcohol-free antiseptic rinse. You can also monitor the Vasseur v. Johnson & Johnson case status through the PACER system or legal news aggregators to see if a class member registration period opens up later this year.