The Lion King Explained: What Most People Get Wrong About the 1994 Classic

The Lion King Explained: What Most People Get Wrong About the 1994 Classic

You probably think you know the story of how The Lion King became a global juggernaut. We've all heard the "Hamlet with lions" pitch a thousand times. But honestly, back in the early '90s, Disney didn't even think this movie was going to be a hit. While the A-list animators were busy working on Pocahontas—which everyone at the studio assumed was the "prestige" project—the "B-team" was stuck in a windowless building in Glendale trying to figure out why a movie about a lion cub wasn't working.

It was a mess.

The original script didn't even have Mufasa and Scar as brothers. Scar was just a random, rogue lion leading a pack of baboons. Imagine that for a second. No "long live the king" betrayal, no family tragedy, just a weird turf war between cats and monkeys. It took a massive creative overhaul to turn it into the epic we recognize today.

Why the lion king animated film almost didn't happen

Most people don't realize that The Lion King was Disney's first "original" story. Well, original-ish. Up until then, they had always leaned on fairytales like The Little Mermaid or Beauty and the Beast. This one was terrifying for the executives because there was no pre-existing book to follow.

They called it Bamblet.

Basically, a mix of Bambi and Hamlet. Screenwriter Irene Mecchi famously joked about this during production. But the path to the screen was brutal. The first director, George Scribner, wanted it to be a realistic, National Geographic-style documentary. He hated the idea of the animals breaking out into song. When the studio decided to make it a musical, Scribner walked.

In came Roger Allers and Rob Minkoff. They were first-time directors who had to piece together a story that was constantly shifting. One day they were in Kenya looking at real lions, the next they were trying to explain to Elton John why "Can You Feel the Love Tonight" should be sung by a meerkat and a warthog (Elton hated that idea, by the way, and luckily he won that fight).

The technical magic nobody noticed

We focus on the songs, but the tech behind the lion king animated film was actually revolutionary for 1994. You remember the wildebeest stampede? That two-and-a-half-minute sequence took three years to finish.

📖 Related: A Taste of Soul by Biggie: Why This Brooklyn Classic Still Hits Different

Seriously. Three years.

Disney’s CG department had to write an entirely new computer program just so the wildebeests wouldn't clip through each other. If they had tried to hand-draw that many individual animals running in a pack, it would have looked like a chaotic blur. Instead, they used the Computer Animation Production System (CAPS), a tech partnership with a then-tiny company called Pixar. It allowed them to do those sweeping "rack focus" shots where the camera shifts from an ant in the foreground to a mountain in the back. It made the movie feel like a live-action epic, not just a cartoon.

The "Kimba" controversy that won't go away

If you spend more than five minutes on the internet, you’ll find people claiming Disney "stole" the movie from a 1960s Japanese anime called Kimba the White Lion.

It’s a huge talking point. You’ve got the names (Simba vs. Kimba), the "evil uncle with a scar" trope, and even specific shots that look identical. Matthew Broderick, who voiced adult Simba, even told people early on that he thought he was working on a remake of Kimba.

But here’s the thing: it’s complicated.

The makers of Kimba, Tezuka Productions, never sued. Their official stance was that if you’re making a movie about lions in Africa, you’re eventually going to have a scene where a lion stands on a rock. It’s unavoidable. While Disney animators likely saw Kimba as kids, the actual plot of The Lion King—the heavy Shakespearean themes of guilt and responsibility—is pretty distinct. Most experts see it more as a "cultural osmosis" situation rather than a flat-out heist.

A soundtrack that broke the rules

Hans Zimmer wasn't the obvious choice for this. He was a "dark" composer known for gritty action movies. But Disney wanted that authentic South African sound.

Zimmer’s masterstroke? Bringing in Lebo M.

✨ Don't miss: Why How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days Still Defines the Rom-Com Era

That opening chant in "Circle of Life"? That’s Lebo M. He was a South African exile living in LA, working at a car wash when he got the call. He walked into the studio, saw the concept art, and just started singing. That first take is basically what’s in the movie. It changed everything. Suddenly, the film wasn't just a kids' story; it felt spiritual. It felt massive.

The 2026 perspective: Why it still holds the throne

As we look back from 2026, The Lion King remains the highest-grossing traditionally animated film of all time. Think about that. Even with all the 3D tech and AI-assisted animation we have now, nobody has topped what a bunch of "B-team" animators did with pencils and paper thirty years ago.

The 2019 "photorealistic" remake made a ton of money—billions, actually—but it didn't have the same soul. You can't see a lion's eyebrow move in real life, so the remake felt stiff. The 1994 version embraced the "cartooniness" to show real grief, joy, and fear.

The legacy is still growing, too. With Mufasa: The Lion King recently hitting theaters and the Broadway show still selling out across the globe, the "Circle of Life" is less of a song and more of a business model at this point.

Actionable insights for fans and creators

If you’re looking to revisit this masterpiece or you're a creator trying to understand its success, keep these points in mind:

  • Look for the "rack focus" shots: Next time you watch, notice how the camera moves. It’s why the movie feels "expensive" compared to other 90s cartoons.
  • Listen to the score separate from the songs: Hans Zimmer's instrumental work, like the track "Under the Stars," is where the real emotional heavy lifting happens.
  • Study the "B-Team" mentality: Greatness often comes from the projects people ignore. Because the studio didn't have high expectations, the directors had more freedom to take risks.
  • Check out the Zulu dub: To celebrate the 30th anniversary, Disney released a version in Zulu. It’s the most authentic way to experience the film's setting.

To truly appreciate the lion king animated film, you have to look past the Disney gloss and see the scrappy, experimental movie it actually was. It’s a story about a kid who messes up, runs away, and has to grow up. That’s why it’s still the king.

For those wanting to dig deeper into the production, hunting down the "Diamond Edition" behind-the-scenes features is the best move. It shows the raw pencil tests of the stampede before the computers took over, proving that even in a digital world, the human hand is what makes the magic stick.