You’ve seen the movies. A guy sits on a gold chair, shouts "off with their heads," and spends his afternoons feasting on swan. It’s a fun vibe, but it’s mostly nonsense. If you actually look at the life of a king through a historical lens—whether we’re talking about Henry VIII or a minor Carolingian monarch—the reality was way more stressful, strangely public, and surprisingly boring.
Being a king wasn't just about power. It was a job. A high-stakes, 24/7 management gig where your HR department was a room full of cousins trying to stab you and your "office" was a drafty stone room that smelled like wet dogs.
The Myth of Royal Privacy
One of the weirdest things about the life of a king was that they were almost never alone. Like, ever. If you were Louis XIV at Versailles, your morning started with the levée. This wasn't just waking up; it was a performance. Dozens of high-ranking nobles would crowd into your bedroom just to watch you put on your breeches or wash your face. It sounds humiliating to us, but for them, being the guy who got to hand the King his shirt was the ultimate power move.
Privacy is a modern luxury. In the medieval and early modern periods, a king’s body was basically state property. People watched him eat. They watched him pray. They even hung around outside the door on his wedding night to make sure everything was... moving along.
Honestly, the pressure was immense. You couldn't just have a "bad hair day" and stay in bed. If the king didn't show up, people started whispering about coups or terminal illnesses. The stock market of the time was basically just the king's physical health.
What a King Actually Did All Day
Most people think kings just made "decrees." In reality, the life of a king involved a massive amount of paperwork and tedious meetings.
✨ Don't miss: 100 Biggest Cities in the US: Why the Map You Know is Wrong
Take Philip II of Spain. They called him the "Prudent King," but he was really the "Paperwork King." He spent nearly his entire day at a desk, hunched over reports from colonies thousands of miles away. He was obsessed with detail. He’d micro-manage everything from troop movements in the Netherlands to the specific architectural flourishes on a new monastery. It wasn't glamorous. It was bureaucracy in a crown.
Then you have the traveling.
Before permanent capitals were a thing, a king had to be an itinerant wanderer. You’d pack up your entire court—hundreds of people, tapestries, gold plates, and even the beds—and lug them across the country on muddy roads. Why? Because you had to "show the face." If the people in the north didn't see you for a decade, they’d stop paying taxes or start following a local warlord instead. You had to literally eat your way through your kingdom, staying at different nobles' houses until they were nearly bankrupt from feeding your massive entourage.
The Constant Fear of "Retirement"
In a normal job, you retire and get a gold watch. In the life of a king, retirement usually meant a dungeon or a guillotine.
The paranoia was justified. You weren't just worried about foreign armies. The real threat was usually your own family. Think about the Ottomans. For a long time, they had a "fratricide" rule. When a new Sultan took the throne, his brothers were often executed to prevent civil war. It was brutal, but in their eyes, it was "stability."
🔗 Read more: Cooper City FL Zip Codes: What Moving Here Is Actually Like
Even in England, look at the Wars of the Roses. You’re the king one day, and the next, you’re hiding in a barn because your cousin decided he had a better claim to the throne. You had to be a master of psychology. You had to know who was loyal, who was bribable, and who was just waiting for you to get a fever so they could pounce.
The Health Toll of the Crown
Let’s talk about the physical reality. We imagine kings eating the finest food, which they did, but that was actually the problem.
The life of a king was often a recipe for metabolic disaster. Henry VIII started out as a world-class athlete—tall, muscular, and obsessed with jousting. But by the end? He had a waist measurement of 52 inches and a leg ulcer that literally smelled so bad people could track his movement through the palace by the scent.
Gout was called the "disease of kings" for a reason. Too much rich meat, too much wine, and not enough of anything remotely resembling a vegetable. While the peasants were eating fiber-rich pottage, the king was essentially dying of "luxury."
- Henry VIII: Chronic pain, possible Type 2 diabetes, and brain injury from jousting.
- Charles II of Spain: So inbred his jaw didn't close, making it hard to eat or speak.
- George III: Suffered from what many historians (like Ida Macalpine) argued was porphyria, though modern experts lean toward bipolar disorder.
It wasn't all velvet and silk; it was often bandages and bloodletting.
💡 You might also like: Why People That Died on Their Birthday Are More Common Than You Think
The Economic Burden of Being Royal
You’d think being a king meant you were infinitely rich. Actually, many kings were perpetually broke.
Running a country is expensive. Fighting wars is insanely expensive. Edward III of England actually defaulted on his loans to Italian bankers, which caused a massive financial crash in Florence.
A king had to maintain an image. If you looked poor, you looked weak. If you looked weak, you were dead. So, you spent money you didn't have on palaces you didn't need to impress people you didn't like. It was a cycle of debt that often led to heavy taxation, which led to peasant revolts, which led to... well, more stress for the guy on the throne.
Why the "Life of a King" Still Fascinates Us
We’re obsessed with this because it’s the ultimate "be careful what you wish for" scenario. We want the power, but we forget the cost. The life of a king was a trade-off. You got the gold, but you lost your humanity. You became a symbol instead of a person.
Even today, we see the remnants of this in modern constitutional monarchies. They don't have power, but they still have the lack of privacy. They still have the "performance." It’s a gilded cage that most of us wouldn't actually last a week in.
Actionable Insights for History Buffs
If you’re researching this or just want to understand the reality better, here is how you can spot the difference between "Hollywood Royalty" and "Actual Royalty":
- Check the schedule: If a movie shows a king just hanging out with no staff around, it’s fake. Real kings were surrounded by a "household" that functioned like a small city.
- Look at the dirt: Versailles was famous for its beauty, but also for the fact that people would literally relieve themselves in the hallways because there weren't enough bathrooms. The life of a king was often a mix of extreme splendor and disgusting hygiene.
- Follow the money: Real kings spent 90% of their time worrying about how to pay for their next war or their daughter's dowry.
- Visit the sources: Read the diary of Samuel Pepys or the memoirs of Saint-Simon. They were "insiders" who wrote about the king's digestive issues and bad moods, not just his "glory."
To truly understand the life of a king, stop looking at the crown and start looking at the calendar. It was a grueling, high-pressure management role where the only "retirement plan" was death. It was a life of profound loneliness lived in a crowd.
Practical Steps to Explore More
- Read Primary Memoirs: Skip the textbooks. Go for the Memoirs of the Duc de Saint-Simon. He lived at Versailles and was the ultimate gossip. He describes Louis XIV's daily routine in agonizing, hilarious detail.
- Analyze Royal Diets: Look up the "King's Table" records from the Tudor period. Compare the caloric intake of a monarch to a laborer. It explains a lot about the health crises of the era.
- Visit Physical Spaces: If you ever go to a palace like Hampton Court or the Alcázar of Seville, don't just look at the art. Look at the "backstairs." Look at how the servants moved. You’ll see that the king’s life was a carefully choreographed stage play designed to hide the fact that he was just a man.