Nick Broomfield didn't set out to make a movie about censorship. He wanted to solve a mystery. Or, at the very least, he wanted to poke around the wreckage of a rock star’s death to see if anything didn't fit the official story. What he ended up with was Kurt and Courtney, a documentary that became more famous for the music it couldn't play than the theories it tried to prove. Honestly, if you were around in 1998, you remember the buzz. It was everywhere. It was the film Courtney Love supposedly "didn't want you to see."
That kind of reputation is gold for a filmmaker. But the reality of the Kurt and Courtney film is a lot messier, darker, and weirder than just a legal battle over song rights. It’s a snapshot of a very specific, grimy era of the 90s.
The Sundance Shutdown and the Sound of Silence
Imagine finishing a documentary and getting it into Sundance. It's the dream, right? Then, days before the screening, the widow of your subject threatens to sue the festival into oblivion. That’s exactly what happened. Courtney Love’s legal team was aggressive. They didn't just target the film; they went after the venues.
Because Love controlled the rights to Kurt Cobain’s music, she effectively silenced the movie’s soundtrack. Broomfield had to pivot. He replaced Nirvana’s iconic riffs with music from obscure Pacific Northwest bands like Zeke and The Dwarves. It gives the film this strange, hollow feeling. You’re watching a movie about the biggest rock star on the planet, but you never hear his voice.
Some people say this was Love protecting her late husband’s legacy. Others, including Broomfield, argued it was blatant suppression of free speech.
📖 Related: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
Who are these people?
The "stars" of this documentary aren't exactly A-listers. Broomfield wanders through the Pacific Northwest and Los Angeles, interviewing a parade of people who seem, quite frankly, like they’ve seen too much.
- Hank Harrison: This is Courtney’s biological father. He’s one of the most jarring figures in the film. He flat-out accuses his own daughter of being involved in Kurt’s death. It’s uncomfortable to watch.
- Tom Grant: The private investigator Love actually hired to find Kurt when he went missing from rehab. He’s the one who really fueled the "murder" fire with his theories about blood-morphine levels and the suicide note.
- El Duce: Real name Eldon Hoke. He was the lead singer of a "shock rock" band called The Mentors. In the film, he claims Love offered him $50,000 to "whack" Kurt.
The El Duce interview is legendary for all the wrong reasons. He’s clearly intoxicated, rambling on a patio while someone screams in the background (which he dismisses as "just a rehearsal"). Two days after he spoke to Broomfield, he was hit by a train and killed. No witnesses. That one event did more to cement the film's cult status than anything else.
Why the Kurt and Courtney film shifted gears
About halfway through, you notice something. Broomfield stops trying to be a detective. He realizes he’s never going to find a "smoking gun." The Seattle Police Department wasn't interested in his footage, and the evidence was mostly hearsay from people who weren't exactly reliable narrators.
So, the Kurt and Courtney film becomes a movie about Nick Broomfield trying to make a movie.
👉 See also: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
It turns into a meta-narrative about the difficulty of investigating powerful celebrities. We see him getting kicked off stages and having his funding pulled by MTV. There’s a famous scene where he crashes an ACLU awards dinner where Courtney is a guest speaker. He gets up on stage, sound equipment strapped to his back, and tries to call her out for hypocrisy. He’s eventually dragged away by Danny Goldberg, Nirvana’s former manager.
It’s awkward. It’s brave. It’s a little bit pathetic. But it’s definitely human.
The Truth vs. The Narrative
Did the film prove anything? Not really. Even Broomfield admits by the end that he doesn't think there’s enough evidence to support a murder conspiracy. He settles on a more nuanced, though still unflattering, portrait of a relationship fueled by addiction and codependency.
He portrays Kurt as a fragile soul who was overwhelmed by his own fame. Courtney is portrayed as the ambitious, polarizing figure she has always been. The film doesn't offer a "win" for either side. It just leaves you feeling a bit greasy.
✨ Don't miss: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
Why we're still talking about it in 2026
You'd think a 1998 documentary would be a relic by now. But the Kurt and Courtney film stays relevant because the mystery of Kurt Cobain hasn't aged. If anything, the internet has made conspiracy theories more permanent.
Newer docs like Montage of Heck (2015) had the family's blessing and all the "official" footage. They're beautiful and polished. But they don't have that raw, investigative danger that Broomfield captured. People still go back to the 1998 film because it feels like a forbidden artifact. It represents the "other" side of the story—the one that wasn't approved by a PR team.
What to do if you're interested in the case
If you've watched the film and find yourself falling down the rabbit hole, there are a few things you should look at to get a balanced view.
- Check the Toxicology: Look into the actual reports regarding Cobain’s blood-morphine levels. Many medical experts have since debunked Tom Grant’s claim that Kurt would have been too incapacitated to pull the trigger.
- Read the Journals: Published years after this film, Kurt's own writings provide a much deeper look into his mental state than any interview with a former roommate or a disgruntled father could.
- Watch the Counterpoints: Compare Broomfield's film with Soaked in Bleach (which goes all-in on the conspiracy) and Montage of Heck (which focuses on the art and the man).
The Kurt and Courtney film isn't a definitive record of what happened in April 1994. It's a record of the chaos that followed. It shows how a tragedy can be pulled in a dozen different directions by people with their own agendas. Whether you believe the theories or think it’s all sensationalism, you can’t deny that Broomfield captured a moment in time when rock and roll felt truly dangerous—and truly sad.
If you’re planning to watch it today, keep a skeptical mind. Look past the grainy VHS-style footage and the rambling interviews. The real story isn't just about who pulled a trigger; it's about how we handle the loss of our idols and who gets to tell their story after they're gone.
To dig deeper, you should compare the interviews in the film with the official 2014 Seattle Police Department cold case review, which re-examined the crime scene photos and concluded once again that the original ruling of suicide was correct.