Geoffrey Chaucer starts his big road trip poem with a guy who seems perfect. Seriously. The Knight in The Canterbury Tales is the first person we meet in the General Prologue, and on the surface, he’s basically a walking medieval recruitment poster. He’s brave. He’s "worthy." He’s fought in every major crusade from Alexandria to Prussia. Honestly, if you were a 14th-century reader, you probably thought, "Yeah, okay, this guy is the GOAT."
But here’s the thing. Chaucer was a genius of subtlety.
If you look closely at the Knight, something feels... off. Or at least, more complicated than your high school English teacher might have let on. He’s not just a flat "good guy" archetype. He’s a professional soldier living in a world where the very idea of knighthood was dying. He’s dusty, he’s stained, and he’s just come straight from the battlefield without even changing his clothes. There’s a grit there that people usually miss when they’re busy focusing on the "chivalry" part of his description.
The Problem with the Knight’s Resume
When Chaucer lists the Knight’s battles, it’s not just a random list of cool places. It’s a map of the late medieval world’s bloodiest conflicts. He was at Alexandria in 1365. He was in Lithuania and Russia with the Teutonic Knights. He fought in Granada and North Africa.
Wait.
Think about that for a second. If he was at Alexandria, he witnessed one of the most controversial events of the era. The "Crusade" there wasn't some noble defense; it was a chaotic raid where the city was sacked, and the spoils were hauled away while the leaders argued. Terry Jones—the Monty Python guy who was also a legit medieval scholar—wrote an entire book, Chaucer’s Knight: The Portrait of a Medieval Mercenary, arguing that this guy wasn't a hero at all. Jones suggests he was basically a "hired gun" or a mercenary for hire.
Now, not everyone agrees with that. Scholars like Maurice Keen argue that the Knight represents the "True Chivalry" that was fading away. But that tension is exactly why he's the most interesting character in the book. Is he a noble relic of a better time? Or is he a survivor who’s seen too much blood and is trying to wash his soul clean on a pilgrimage?
His Clothes Tell the Real Story
You can tell a lot about a person by their laundry. Chaucer makes a huge point of telling us that the Knight's fustian (a heavy cloth) tunic is "al bismotered with his habergeoun."
✨ Don't miss: Williams Sonoma Deer Park IL: What Most People Get Wrong About This Kitchen Icon
Basically, his shirt is stained with rust and grease from his chainmail.
This is a massive detail. It means he didn't go home to shower or put on his "I’m a rich noble" clothes before heading to Canterbury. He went straight from the boat to the pilgrimage. Most people see this as a sign of his piety—he’s so humble he doesn't care about fashion. But you could also read it as a man who is literally carrying the physical marks of war with him. He’s dirty. He’s tired. He’s out of place among the flashy characters like the Squire or the Prioress.
Why the Knight Tells a Romance (and Why it Fails)
The Knight’s Tale is the first story told, and it’s a long, sweeping epic about two guys, Palamon and Arcite, who fall in love with the same woman, Emily, while they're stuck in a tower. It’s based on Boccaccio’s Teseida. It’s full of philosophy, ancient gods, and big speeches about the "First Mover" and the order of the universe.
It’s also kind of a bummer.
The Knight tries to tell a story about how the world is orderly and how chivalry solves everything. But the plot keeps getting interrupted by chaos. Arcite wins the big tournament—the "knight's way" to solve a problem—but then he gets thrown from his horse and dies in a freak accident because the gods are petty. The Knight is trying so hard to believe that the world makes sense, but his own story proves that it doesn't.
- He wants order; he gets a freak accident.
- He wants romance; the woman in the story, Emily, barely gets to speak and would honestly rather stay single.
- He wants "worthy" combat; but death comes for the winner anyway.
You’ve got to feel for him. He’s a man of the 14th century watching the Black Death, the Peasant's Revolt, and the corruption of the Church. He needs the world to be organized, but he knows it's not.
The Tension Between Father and Son
If you want to see what the Knight isn't, look at his son, the Squire. Chaucer puts them right next to each other, and the contrast is hilarious.
🔗 Read more: Finding the most affordable way to live when everything feels too expensive
The Knight is stained and serious. The Squire is "embroidered like a meadow," full of fresh flowers. He’s got curly hair, he sings, he plays the flute, and he’s mostly interested in "winning his lady's grace."
The Knight is the old world of real, gritty warfare. The Squire is the new world of "courtly love" and looking good in a tight tunic. It’s a classic generational gap. The Knight has seen the reality of the Crusades; the Squire treats knighthood like a hobby to help him get dates. This isn't just flavor text; it’s Chaucer showing us that the "Knight" as a social class is evolving into something much softer and more performative.
Is he actually a "Mercenary"?
The mercenary theory is a big deal in Chaucer studies. See, in the 1380s, knights were expensive. The feudal system—where you gave a guy land and he fought for you for 40 days—was basically dead. By the time Chaucer was writing, kings were just hiring people.
The places the Knight fought are "hotspots." If he fought for the Teutonic Knights in Prussia, he was involved in what was essentially a long-term land grab disguised as a religious mission. If he fought in Algeciras, he was part of a siege.
But here’s the counter-argument: Chaucer uses the word "worthy" for the Knight five times. In Middle English, "worthy" didn't just mean "good." It meant socially high-ranking, brave, and capable. Chaucer doesn't usually use that kind of repetitive praise for characters he’s mocking (like the Friar or the Pardoner). He seems to genuinely respect the Knight, even if he’s acknowledging that the Knight’s profession is a messy, bloody business.
The Knight as the Group’s Peacekeeper
One of the most human moments for the Knight happens way later, after the Pardoner tells his story. The Pardoner is a total scammer who tries to sell fake relics to the pilgrims, and he gets into a nasty, verbal brawl with the Host. It gets ugly. People are shouting. The vibe of the trip is ruined.
The Knight steps in.
💡 You might also like: Executive desk with drawers: Why your home office setup is probably failing you
He’s the only one with enough social "weight" to shut them both up and make them kiss and make up. He doesn't do it with a sword; he does it with authority. This tells us everything we need to know about his role in the social hierarchy of the pilgrimage. He is the "estate" that is supposed to protect and govern. Even if he’s a bit out of date, he’s the only thing keeping the group from falling apart into total chaos.
Why We Still Talk About Him
The Knight matters because he represents the "Perfect Idea" versus the "Gritty Reality."
We all do this. We have an idea of what a "leader" or a "hero" should look like, and then we meet the actual person who has been through the meat grinder of reality. The Knight is that guy. He’s the veteran who doesn't talk about the war but can’t get the stains off his shirt.
He’s also the key to understanding the whole structure of The Canterbury Tales. Because he starts the storytelling, he sets the bar. Every character after him either tries to match his "high-class" style (like the Miller, who immediately ruins it by getting drunk and telling a dirty story) or tries to subvert it.
What You Can Learn from the Knight
If you’re reading Chaucer today, don’t just see the Knight as a boring "good guy." See him as a man in transition.
- Look for the gaps. What is Chaucer not saying? He mentions the Knight’s battles but never his home or his wife. The Knight is a man defined entirely by his job.
- Watch the social interactions. The way he stops the fight between the Host and the Pardoner shows he values social stability over "winning" an argument.
- Consider the "Stain." That rusty tunic is the most important image in his prologue. It’s the bridge between his noble ideals and the dirty work he had to do to keep them.
Actionable Insights for Your Next Reading
If you want to actually understand this character beyond a SparkNotes summary, try these three things:
- Compare the Knight to the Miller. Read the Knight's Tale and then immediately read the Miller's Tale. The Miller specifically says he’s going to "quit" (repay/match) the Knight’s story. It’s a direct middle finger to the Knight’s "noble" view of the world.
- Map the Battles. Look up the Siege of Alexandria (1365) and the campaigns in "Ruce" (Russia) and "Lettow" (Lithuania). Seeing the sheer distance this man traveled makes his "tired" appearance much more impactful.
- Focus on the Silence. Notice that the Knight doesn't brag. In a book full of characters who won't shut up about how great they are, the Knight’s silence about his own glory is his most defining trait.
The Knight isn't a hero because he's perfect. He's a hero because he’s trying to hold onto a sense of duty in a world that is rapidly changing. He’s a bit of a dinosaur, a bit of a mystery, and a whole lot more human than he looks on a pedestal. Honestly, that’s why he’s still the first one out of the gate after all these centuries.