Honestly, if you were online in April 2017, you remember exactly where you were when the Kendall Jenner Pepsi ad dropped. It wasn't just a bad commercial. It was a cultural earthquake that somehow united the entire internet in a rare moment of collective "What were they thinking?" Pepsi tried to sell soda by mimicking the high-stakes tension of the Black Lives Matter movement, and the result was a PR disaster so massive it's still taught in business schools nearly a decade later.
The premise was simple, if deeply flawed. Kendall Jenner—the ultra-famous Kardashian-Jenner sister—is in the middle of a high-fashion photo shoot. She's wearing a blonde wig and looking "edgy." Suddenly, a crowd of protesters marches by. Are they protesting climate change? Police brutality? Economic inequality? We don't know. Their signs just say things like "Love" and "Join the Conversation." It's the most sanitized version of activism you've ever seen.
Jenner sees the crowd, rips off her wig (handing it to a Black assistant, which was its own mini-scandal), and joins the march. The climax? She walks up to a line of police officers and hands one a can of Pepsi. He sips it. He smiles. The crowd cheers. Conflict solved. Racism ended? Not quite.
Why the "Live for Now" Campaign Flopped So Hard
The backlash was instant. It wasn't just that the ad was corny; it was that it felt like it was actively mocking real-life tragedy. Specifically, people pointed out how the ad almost frame-for-frame copied a powerful photo of Ieshia Evans, a Black woman who was arrested while standing peacefully in front of riot police in Baton Rouge.
In the real world, that moment ended in handcuffs. In the Pepsi universe, it ended with a carbonated beverage and a high-five.
💡 You might also like: Why the Old Spice Deodorant Advert Still Wins Over a Decade Later
The Echo Chamber Problem
How did a company as big as PepsiCo mess up this badly? It basically came down to an internal echo chamber. Most big brands hire outside ad agencies to give them an objective perspective. Pepsi didn't do that. They used their own in-house team, the Creators League Studio.
- No Outside Eyes: Because they kept it in-house, there was nobody to say, "Hey, this is actually incredibly offensive."
- A Lack of Diversity: Reports later revealed that the creative team was largely white and seemingly disconnected from the gravity of the social justice movements they were trying to mimic.
- Targeting the Wrong "Vibe": They wanted to capture "millennial energy," but they mistook deep-seated social unrest for a trendy aesthetic.
The commercial was only live for about 24 hours before Pepsi pulled the plug. They issued a groveling apology, saying they "missed the mark" and even apologized to Kendall Jenner herself for putting her in that position. It was a total mess.
The Financial and Cultural Fallout
You might think a disaster this big would bankrupt a company, but business is weird. Pepsi’s stock didn’t actually tank in the long run. In fact, most people didn't stop drinking the soda. However, the reputational damage was a different story.
For years after, Pepsi's "brand sentiment" scores were in the gutter. They became the poster child for "performative activism"—when a brand pretends to care about a cause just to sell products. It made consumers, especially Gen Z, much more skeptical of corporate messaging.
📖 Related: Palantir Alex Karp Stock Sale: Why the CEO is Actually Selling Now
Kendall Jenner’s Role
Jenner stayed quiet for a long time. She finally addressed the controversy on an episode of Keeping Up with the Kardashians, where she was visibly upset. She claimed she was told the ad would be "inspiring" and "great." It was a classic case of a celebrity not doing their due diligence on a project because they trusted a massive brand like Pepsi.
What We Can Learn from the Pepsi Disaster
Even today, the Kendall Jenner Pepsi ad serves as the ultimate cautionary tale for marketers. It's not enough to just "be part of the conversation." You have to actually understand what the conversation is about.
1. Authenticity Over Aesthetics
You can't just borrow the "look" of a protest without acknowledging the pain behind it. If your brand doesn't have a history of supporting social justice, suddenly jumping in with a celebrity and a soda can feels exploitative. People can smell a "cash grab" from a mile away.
2. The Danger of In-House Hubris
Internal teams often become too close to a project. They want to please their bosses, so they stop being critical. This ad proved that you need "devil's advocates" in the room—people who are willing to tell the CEO that an idea is terrible.
👉 See also: USD to UZS Rate Today: What Most People Get Wrong
3. Impact Over Intent
Pepsi clearly didn't set out to be "the most hated brand on the internet." Their intent was "unity" and "peace." But in marketing, intent doesn't matter nearly as much as impact. If your message hurts people or trivializes their struggles, your "good intentions" are irrelevant.
Final Takeaways for Brands and Creators
If you're looking to avoid a "Pepsi moment," the roadmap is pretty clear. First, test your content with a diverse group of real people before you spend $5 million on airtime. Second, if you want to support a cause, do it through action (like donations or policy changes), not just a 30-second commercial.
The era of "vague activism" is over. Modern audiences want brands to be real or just stay quiet. If you aren't willing to actually stand for something when it's hard, don't try to profit from it when it's "trendy."
To truly understand how far marketing has come since this 2017 blunder, look at how brands handled social movements in 2020 and beyond. The ones that succeeded were the ones that focused on their own internal diversity and long-term community support rather than casting a supermodel to hand out drinks to the police.
Moving forward, if you are a business owner or a creator, vet your collaborations against the "Pepsi Test": Does this message simplify a complex human struggle for the sake of a sale? If the answer is yes, hit the delete button immediately.