History has a funny way of smoothing out the rough edges of chaos until it looks like a clean timeline in a textbook. But if you look at the Iraq war with Iran, nothing about it was clean. It was a messy, grinding, and frankly horrific eight-year slog that changed the Middle East forever. People often call it the "First Gulf War," though most of us just remember it as that endless conflict from 1980 to 1988 that seemed to produce nothing but casualties.
It started with a miscalculation. Saddam Hussein looked at Iran in 1980 and saw a country in total disarray. The Shah was gone. The Ayatollah Khomeini was in. The military was being purged. Saddam thought he could swoop in, grab some oil-rich territory, and maybe become the new leader of the Arab world. He was wrong. Very wrong.
Why the Iraq war with Iran lasted so long
Most wars are supposed to be fast. You hit hard, you take the capital, you negotiate. But this conflict turned into a weird, modern version of World War I. Think trenches. Think barbed wire. Think about thousands of young men being sent across minefields. It’s wild to realize that while the rest of the world was getting into the digital age, these two nations were fighting a war that felt like it belonged in 1916.
Saddam’s initial invasion in September 1980 was meant to be a lightning strike. He wanted the Shatt al-Arab waterway. It’s a tiny bit of water, but for Iraq, it’s the only real way to get to the sea. He also hoped the Khuzestan province would rise up and join him. They didn't. Instead, the invasion acted like a giant adrenaline shot for the Iranian Revolution. It gave the new religious leadership a common enemy.
- Human Wave Attacks: This is one of the darkest parts of the war. Iran, lacking the high-tech weaponry Iraq was getting from the Soviets and the French, relied on its massive population. They sent "Basij" volunteers—some just teenagers—to charge Iraqi positions.
- The sheer grit of the Iranian defense caught Baghdad off guard.
- By 1982, the Iraqis were actually the ones on the defensive.
Iraq had the better gear. They had T-72 tanks and Mirage jets. Iran had the leftovers from the Shah’s era—F-14 Tomcats that they somehow kept flying with black-market parts and sheer ingenuity. It was a bizarre mismatch of tech vs. numbers.
👉 See also: Otay Ranch Fire Update: What Really Happened with the Border 2 Fire
The chemical weapon tragedy
We can't talk about the Iraq war with Iran without mentioning the chemical warfare. It’s one of the most documented uses of nerve agents and mustard gas in modern history. Saddam’s forces used these weapons to stop those Iranian human wave attacks. The world mostly looked the other way because, at the time, many Western and Arab powers were more afraid of Iran’s revolutionary fervor than Saddam’s brutality.
The attack on Halabja in 1988 remains the most haunting example. It wasn't just soldiers; it was civilians. Thousands of Kurds died in minutes. It showed just how desperate the Iraqi regime had become to end a war that was draining their treasury dry.
The "War of the Tankers" and Global Involvement
Eventually, the fighting spilled out of the trenches and into the Persian Gulf. This is where the rest of the world really started to freak out. Both sides started hitting oil tankers. If you’ve ever wondered why gas prices jump when there’s tension in the Strait of Hormuz, this war is the reason why that fear is so deeply baked into the global economy.
The U.S. Navy ended up escorting Kuwaiti tankers to keep the oil flowing. This led to direct skirmishes between the U.S. and Iran, like Operation Praying Mantis. It’s a bit of a "forgotten" naval war, but it was the largest engagement of surface warships for the U.S. since World War II.
✨ Don't miss: The Faces Leopard Eating Meme: Why People Still Love Watching Regret in Real Time
Honestly, the international involvement was a mess of contradictions. You had the Soviet Union and France selling massive amounts of arms to Iraq. You had the U.S. publicly supporting Iraq while secretly (and illegally) selling missiles to Iran in the Iran-Contra scandal. It was a cynical, multi-layered game of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend," except everyone was everyone’s enemy at different times of the week.
The economic toll of eight years of fire
By the time the UN-brokered ceasefire happened in August 1988, both countries were basically broke. Iraq had gone from being one of the wealthiest nations in the region to being billions of dollars in debt. This debt is actually what led Saddam to invade Kuwait just two years later—he needed the oil money to pay off the costs of the war with Iran.
- Over 1 million people died.
- The borders didn't really move.
- The Shatt al-Arab remained a point of contention.
- No one "won."
What we get wrong about the Iraq war with Iran
People often think this was a purely religious war. Sunnis vs. Shias. While that was definitely a huge part of the rhetoric—Khomeini called Saddam an infidel and Saddam called the Iranians "Persian fire-worshippers"—it was also a classic land grab. It was about oil, regional dominance, and the personal egos of two men who refused to back down.
Khomeini famously said that accepting the peace treaty was like "drinking poison." He really wanted to march all the way to Baghdad and topple Saddam. On the flip side, Saddam tried to frame himself as the "Defender of the Arab Gate," a role that allowed him to keep receiving billions in subsidies from neighboring Gulf states.
🔗 Read more: Whos Winning The Election Rn Polls: The January 2026 Reality Check
The war also solidified the power of the Revolutionary Guard (IRGC) in Iran. Because the regular army was mistrusted by the new regime, the IRGC became the elite force that handled the most difficult fronts. Today, the IRGC is a massive political and economic powerhouse in Iran. You can trace that direct line of power back to the marshes of southern Iraq in 1984.
Modern-day echoes
If you look at the map of the Middle East today, the scars of the Iraq war with Iran are everywhere. The heavy Iranian influence in Iraqi politics today is a direct reaction to that war. After 2003, Iran made sure that Iraq would never be a threat to them again.
The veterans of that war are the ones who ran both countries for the next three decades. In Iran, the "Sacred Defense" (as they call it) is the foundational myth of the current state. In Iraq, the memory of the "Qadisiyah" (Saddam’s name for it) was used to fuel a specific brand of nationalism that crashed and burned when the regime fell.
Actionable insights for history buffs and analysts
To really understand the current geopolitical landscape, you have to look at the 1980s. History isn't just about dates; it's about the lingering trauma that dictates how leaders act forty years later.
- Study the Geography: Look at the Shatt al-Arab on a map. You'll see why that tiny sliver of water is still a massive diplomatic headache.
- Follow the Arms Trail: Research how "dual-use" technology was sold to Iraq during the 80s. It provides a blueprint for how modern proxy wars are still being funded today.
- Read Personal Accounts: Instead of just military stats, look for the translated memoirs of the soldiers. The reality of the "marsh warfare" in places like the Majnoon Islands is more harrowing than any fiction.
- Analyze the Debt: Understand that the invasion of Kuwait in 1990 was a direct sequel to the 1988 ceasefire. Economic desperation drives military aggression more often than ideology does.
The war didn't just end; it just changed shape. It set the stage for the 1990s, the 2003 invasion, and the rise of various insurgent groups. It’s the "Great War" of the Middle East, and its shadow is still incredibly long.