Patrick Lencioni has a knack for making complicated corporate problems feel like common sense. Honestly, when you first pick up The Ideal Team Player, it feels almost too simple. You might even roll your eyes. "Humble, hungry, and smart? That's it?" But then you think about that one coworker who drove you crazy last year. They were brilliant, sure, but they were a "brilliant jerk." Or maybe you think of the person who was incredibly nice but had zero drive, so you ended up doing their work for them. Suddenly, Lencioni’s framework doesn't look like a greeting card. It looks like a survival guide.
The humble hungry smart book—officially titled The Ideal Team Player: How to Recognize and Cultivate The Three Essential Virtues—was released in 2016. Since then, it’s basically become the Bible for HR departments and CEOs who are tired of hiring people who look great on paper but poison the well once they actually start. It’s a leadership fable, a style Lencioni pioneered with The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, meaning the first half of the book is a fictional story about a guy named Jeff Shanley trying to save his family’s construction company.
It’s an easy read. Fast. But the implications for how we work together are massive.
What Lencioni Actually Means by "Smart" (It’s Not What You Think)
Let’s get the biggest misconception out of the way first. When people hear "smart," they think IQ. They think SAT scores, coding ability, or knowing how to pivot a spreadsheet until it sings.
That’s not it. Not even close.
In the humble hungry smart book, "Smart" refers to emotional intelligence (EQ). It’s about people skills. It’s the ability to read a room, understand how your words affect others, and engage in a way that doesn't make everyone else want to quit. A "smart" person in this context knows when to speak up and when to shut up. They ask good questions. They listen.
If you’ve ever worked with someone who is technically a genius but constantly "puts their foot in it" during client meetings, you know exactly what a lack of this virtue looks like. Lencioni argues that being "smart" is the most dangerous virtue to have in isolation. Why? Because a person who is smart but neither humble nor hungry is a "charmer." They can manipulate their way through an interview, make everyone like them, and then do absolutely nothing while taking credit for your hard work.
📖 Related: TCPA Shadow Creek Ranch: What Homeowners and Marketers Keep Missing
The Chemistry of Humility and Hunger
Humility is the most important of the three. Lencioni cites C.S. Lewis’s idea here: humility isn't thinking less of yourself, it’s thinking of yourself less.
- In a team setting, this means:
- Sharing credit.
- Admitting mistakes.
- Defining success collectively rather than individually.
Then there’s "Hungry." This is the internal fire. It’s the person who is looking for more to do, more to learn, and more responsibility. They don’t need to be managed because they are self-motivated. They’re thinking about the next step before you’ve even finished the current one.
But here is where it gets tricky. If you have someone who is Hungry and Smart but lacks Humility, you have the "Skillful Politician." These people are terrifying. They are hard-working and socially adept, but they use those skills purely for their own advancement. They will climb the ladder by stepping on your face, and they’ll do it with a smile that makes you think they’re doing you a favor.
Why Most Companies Get Hiring Wrong
We usually hire for "Hungry." We look at resumes for "Smart" (the IQ kind). We almost never interview for "Humble."
Think about it. Interviews are designed for narcissists. We ask people to sit in a room and talk about how great they are for an hour. If someone is truly humble, they might use the word "we" more than "I." A traditional recruiter might see that as a lack of confidence or a sign that the candidate didn't actually do the work. Lencioni suggests we need to flip that.
The humble hungry smart book provides a roadmap for shifting that perspective. He suggests getting candidates out of the office. Take them to a restaurant. See how they treat the server. (That’s the humility check). Ask them about their biggest failure. If they blame their old boss, they aren't humble. If they can't think of a failure, they aren't being honest.
👉 See also: Starting Pay for Target: What Most People Get Wrong
The Categorization of Non-Ideal Players
Lencioni breaks down what happens when someone only has one or two of these traits. It's kinda brutal, but it's incredibly accurate.
- The Pawn (Only Humble): Nice people. Everyone likes them. They just don't get anything done and don't have the social grease to influence the team.
- The Bulldozer (Only Hungry): They get results, but they leave a trail of bodies behind them. They destroy the culture in the name of the "win."
- The Charmer (Only Smart): They are fun at happy hour, but they are essentially dead weight.
- The Accidental Mess-Maker (Humble and Hungry, but not Smart): These people mean well. They work hard. But they constantly say the wrong thing and create interpersonal drama they didn't intend to. You're always cleaning up after them.
Real-World Application: It’s Not Just for New Hires
A common mistake leaders make after reading the humble hungry smart book is using it as a hatchet to fire people. "Oh, Sarah isn't hungry. Get rid of her."
That’s a waste of talent.
The real value of this framework is in development. Most people can grow in these areas if they have a clear vocabulary for it. If you tell an employee, "You're a jerk," they get defensive. If you say, "I value your hunger, but your 'smart' (EQ) is lagging behind, and it's making the team hesitate to collaborate with you," you've given them a specific path to improvement.
Nuance matters here. You can't just demand humility. You have to model it. If a leader isn't willing to admit their own mistakes, they have zero chance of building a team of "Ideal Team Players."
Actionable Steps for Your Team
If you're looking to actually use this instead of just letting the book sit on your shelf, start here.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Old Spice Deodorant Advert Still Wins Over a Decade Later
Self-Assessment first. Be honest. Which one are you lacking? Most high-achievers struggle with humility (ego) or smarts (bluntness). Rarely is a CEO lacking "hunger." Admit your "low" virtue to your team. It sounds counterintuitive, but showing your own struggle with humility is, well, a humble act. It gives everyone else permission to be honest too.
Audit your interview questions. Stop asking "Where do you see yourself in five years?" It’s a useless question. Instead, ask: "What is the most boring thing you've had to do in a job, and how did you handle it?" This gauges hunger. Or ask: "Tell me about someone who is better than you at what you do." This gauges humility.
Stop tolerating the "Brilliant Jerk." This is the hardest part. You might have a salesperson who is 200% of quota but treats the office manager like garbage. They are hungry and "smart" (in a manipulative way) but have zero humility. By keeping them, you are telling the rest of your team that your values are fake. Lencioni is very clear: you cannot have a functional team if you allow the "Skillful Politician" to stay.
Integrate the language into reviews. Make "Humble, Hungry, Smart" part of your quarterly check-ins. Don't make it a "grade." Make it a conversation. "I noticed you took the lead on the project last month and made sure the interns got credit in the board meeting—that was a great display of being humble and smart."
The humble hungry smart book isn't about finding perfect people. They don't exist. It's about finding people who are "enough" in all three areas that they don't have a blind spot big enough to wreck the car. It’s about building a culture where these three virtues are the air everyone breathes. It takes work. It's uncomfortable. But it’s a lot better than the alternative—a workplace full of pawns, bulldozers, and politicians.