It is weird to think of Coriolanus Snow as a hero. Or even a protagonist you’re supposed to root for. But that’s exactly what Francis Lawrence’s 2023 film, The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes movie, asks us to do for over two and a half hours. It’s a gamble. Most prequels fail because they try too hard to explain things nobody asked about, like where a character got their boots or a specific catchphrase. This movie is different. It’s a character study wrapped in the skin of a dystopian thriller, and honestly, it’s probably the most cynical blockbuster we’ve seen in years.
Panem is ugly here. It isn't the shiny, high-tech Capitol we saw with Katniss Everdeen. This is a post-war city still covered in soot, where the elite are hungry and the "monsters" are just kids in a crumbling arena.
Why the 10th Hunger Games felt so different
If you've seen the original trilogy, the 10th Hunger Games in this film feels like a low-budget indie production in comparison. That is intentional. The Tribute center isn't a luxury hotel; it's a zoo. Literally. The kids are kept in a monkey house. There are no fancy chariots or fire-dresses.
This movie shows the moment the Games changed from a boring punishment into a televised spectacle. Tom Blyth plays a young "Coryo" Snow, and he's desperate. His family is broke. They are eating lima beans and cabbage while pretending to be royalty. When he gets assigned to mentor Lucy Gray Baird—the tribute from District 12—he isn't doing it out of the goodness of his heart. He’s doing it to win a scholarship.
Rachel Zegler’s Lucy Gray is the polar opposite of Katniss. Where Katniss was a hunter who hated the cameras, Lucy Gray is a performer who lives for them. She’s part of the Covey, a group of musical nomads. She uses her voice as a weapon. It’s a fascinating dynamic because it forces you to realize that the "hero" of this story is actually the man who eventually becomes a genocidal dictator. You’re basically watching the origin of a villain while hoping he survives. It’s messy.
The Dr. Gaul and Casca Highbottom Influence
We have to talk about Viola Davis. As Dr. Volumnia Gaul, she is terrifying. She’s the Head Gamemaker and she treats the world like a giant, cruel science experiment. She’s the one who asks the central question of the movie: "What are the Hunger Games for?"
💡 You might also like: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
Then you have Peter Dinklage as Casca Highbottom. He’s the man who "invented" the games as a drunken joke that went too far. He hates Snow. Not because Snow is evil yet, but because he sees Snow’s father in him. The tension between these three—Gaul, Highbottom, and Snow—is where the real philosophy of the movie lives. It’s a debate about human nature. Are we naturally violent? Do we need the "contract" of the state to keep us from killing each other?
Dr. Gaul believes we are all animals. Snow eventually agrees.
Breaking down the three-act structure
The movie is split into three distinct chapters. This has frustrated some viewers who felt the third act dragged, but it’s actually the most important part of the story.
- The Mentorship: Snow tries to make Lucy Gray a star to save himself.
- The Games: A brutal, claustrophobic battle in a single arena. No Cornucopia, just rubble and snakes.
- The Peacekeeper Era: Snow is sent to District 12 as punishment. This is where the "Songbird" and the "Snake" actually collide.
In the first two acts, you sort of like Snow. He’s charming. He seems to care about Lucy Gray. But the third act is a slow-motion car crash of paranoia. He starts to value power over love. When he’s in the woods with Lucy Gray at the end, the shift in his eyes is chilling. He doesn't just lose his way; he chooses a different one.
The movie doesn't give you a happy ending. It gives you an inevitable one.
📖 Related: New Movies in Theatre: What Most People Get Wrong About This Month's Picks
The significance of the music
Dave Cobb and Rachel Zegler did something special with the soundtrack. This isn't pop music. It’s Appalachian folk. Songs like "The Hanging Tree" get an origin story here. In the original movies, that song was a rebel anthem. Here, it’s a song about a real execution that Snow witnessed.
The music serves a narrative purpose. It’s how Lucy Gray communicates her boundaries. When she sings "Pure as the Driven Snow," she’s literally trying to convince herself that Coriolanus is a good person. She’s wrong, of course. But the tragedy is that for a moment, he almost was.
What people get wrong about the ending
A lot of people walked out of the theater wondering what happened to Lucy Gray. Did she die? Did she run away?
The point is that it doesn't matter. To Snow, she became a ghost. She’s the one thing he couldn't control, and that lack of control is what fuels his obsession with order for the next sixty years. The movie ends with him returning to the Capitol, poison in hand, ready to climb the ladder. He kills his old self to become President Snow.
It’s a grim realization. Every time you see Donald Sutherland in the original movies now, you'll think of the boy who once cried over a girl in a rainbow dress. The film successfully bridges that gap without feeling like fan service.
👉 See also: A Simple Favor Blake Lively: Why Emily Nelson Is Still the Ultimate Screen Mystery
Real-world themes and complexity
Suzanne Collins wrote the book with Thomas Hobbes and John Locke in mind. The movie sticks to that. It’s a look at how authoritarianism starts—not with a bang, but with a series of small, "necessary" compromises. Snow thinks he’s doing the right thing. He thinks he’s bringing order to chaos.
The film also tackles the ethics of media. How much of what we see on screen is "real"? Even Lucy Gray admits she’s always putting on a show. The "romance" between her and Snow is always tinged with the question of survival. Did she love him, or did she need a mentor who wouldn't let her die? The movie lets that ambiguity sit there. It’s uncomfortable.
Technical details and craftsmanship
The cinematography by Jo Willems is stark. The Capitol is designed with "Stalinist" architecture—huge, imposing concrete structures that make individuals look tiny. This contrasts with the lush, overgrown greenery of District 12.
The costumes also tell a story. Snow starts in a recycled, oversized suit and ends in a tailored, blood-red uniform. His transformation is visual as much as it is psychological.
How to dive deeper into the lore
If you've watched the movie and want to understand the full scope of the Panem history, there are a few things you should actually do to get the most out of the experience.
- Read the book's internal monologues: The movie is great, but the book is written entirely from inside Snow’s head. Seeing how he justifies his betrayals in real-time makes the film's performance by Tom Blyth even more impressive.
- Rewatch the original trilogy with "The Hanging Tree" in mind: Knowing that Snow heard Lucy Gray sing that song makes his reaction to Katniss singing it in Mockingjay completely different. It’s not just a rebel song to him; it’s a personal taunt from his past.
- Compare the 10th and 74th Games: Look at the technology gap. It highlights how much Snow himself contributed to the "glamorization" of the slaughter. He didn't just inherit the system; he built the version we recognize.
- Track the "Rose" symbolism: In this movie, we see his grandmother’s roses. They represent his family’s dying legacy. By the time he’s President, he uses the scent of roses to cover the smell of blood from the sores in his mouth. It’s a literal and figurative mask.
The The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes movie isn't just another sequel. It’s a necessary piece of the puzzle that explains why the world of Panem is so broken. It turns a villain into a human, which is far more frightening than leaving him as a monster.