Peter Jackson probably didn’t mean for his second trip to Middle-earth to be this messy. Honestly, looking back at The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, it’s a miracle the movie even exists in a watchable state. It was the end of an era. We all sat in those theater seats in 2014, some of us wearing plastic pointed ears, waiting to see how a tiny children's book could possibly sustain a three-hour war movie.
It was loud. It was CG-heavy. And man, was it controversial.
Most people forget that Jackson stepped in late to replace Guillermo del Toro. He was basically building the wings of the plane while it was already in the air. You can see it in the final product. Some shots look like a Renaissance painting, while others look like a video game from 2005. But even with the "HFR" (High Frame Rate) drama and the overstuffed plot, there is something deeply fascinating about how this movie tried to bridge the gap between a whimsical fairy tale and the soul-crushing stakes of The Lord of the Rings.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies was never just about a battle
The title is actually a bit of a misnomer if you’re looking for a tight narrative. By the time we get to The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, the main "point" of the book—the dragon—is dead within the first ten minutes. Smaug gets a face full of Black Arrow, and then he’s gone. It’s an odd pacing choice. It leaves the rest of the film to deal with what happens when a bunch of different races realize there’s a massive pile of gold sitting in a mountain with no one guarding it.
Greed is the actual villain here.
Thorin Oakenshield’s descent into "dragon sickness" is arguably the strongest part of the film. Richard Armitage played that role with a heavy, Shakespearean weight that the script sometimes didn't deserve. You see it in his eyes. He goes from a noble king to a paranoid miser, pacing around a floor of gold while his friends look on in horror. It’s dark. It’s uncomfortable. It’s also the only thing that gives the massive CGI melee at the end any emotional stakes at all.
💡 You might also like: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
Critics at the time, like those at The Hollywood Reporter or Variety, pointed out that the film felt "thin." It's true. You’re stretching a few chapters into a massive blockbuster. To fill the time, we got Alfrid Lickspittle—a character almost universally loathed by the fanbase—and a love triangle between a dwarf, an elf, and Legolas that wasn't in the book. It felt like padding. Because it was.
Why the CGI in the third Hobbit movie felt different
If you watch The Fellowship of the Ring, the orcs are guys in makeup. They’re sweaty. They’re gross. In The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, the orcs are digital constructs. This changed everything.
- Azog the Defiler: He’s a completely digital character. While Manu Bennett did the performance capture, the "physicality" feels floaty.
- The Billy Goat Cavalry: One of the most "video game" moments in the series. Dwarves riding goats up a mountain should be cool, but the physics felt off.
- Dain Ironfoot: Billy Connolly is a legend, but his character was entirely CGI. They didn't even have a physical costume for him on set during most of the production.
This reliance on digital effects was a byproduct of the compressed schedule. Jackson didn't have the years of pre-production he had for the original trilogy. He was often figuring out the shots on the day of filming. When you’re under that kind of pressure, you lean on Weta Digital to "fix it in post." The result is a movie that feels spectacular but lacks the "dirt under the fingernails" realism that made Middle-earth feel like a real place back in 2001.
Breaking down the actual five armies
It’s funny how many people can’t actually name the five armies. It depends on whether you're reading the book or watching the movie, too. In the film version of The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, the lineup is generally considered to be:
- The Dwarves: Led by Thorin and later Dain from the Iron Hills.
- The Elves: Thranduil’s army, looking very shiny and disciplined.
- The Men: Bard the Bowman leading the survivors of Lake-town.
- The Orcs: The first wave from Dol Guldur and Moria.
- The Orcs (again) or the Eagles: This is where it gets messy. In the book, it's Men, Elves, Dwarves, Orcs, and Wargs. In the movie, the "fifth" army is often cited as the second Orc army from Gundabad, or the Eagles who show up to save the day.
The scale of the conflict is massive. We're talking about a multi-front war involving trolls with catapults on their backs and giant earth-eating worms that show up once and then disappear forever. (Seriously, where did the Were-worms go? They could have ended the battle in five minutes.)
📖 Related: Album Hopes and Fears: Why We Obsess Over Music That Doesn't Exist Yet
The tragedy of Thranduil and the Elves
Lee Pace as Thranduil is a vibe. He’s cold, he’s arrogant, and he’s riding a massive elk. The movie tries to give him a reason for being such a jerk—revealing he lost his wife to the orcs in the past—but it’s buried under layers of action. The interaction between him and Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly) highlights the weirdest part of the film: the forced romance.
Kili and Tauriel’s "love" was meant to ground the war in personal stakes. Instead, it became a meme. When Tauriel asks, "Why does it hurt so much?" and Thranduil responds, "Because it was real," audiences in 2014 weren't always crying. Some were laughing. It felt unearned. Yet, you have to appreciate the attempt to add some heart to a movie that is essentially one long 45-minute fight scene.
The Extended Edition: Is it actually better?
If you’ve only seen the theatrical cut, you’ve missed the best (and weirdest) parts of The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies. The R-rated Extended Edition adds about 20 minutes of footage. It’s much more violent. There are chariot races on ice, more Bofur, and some genuinely cool moments with the Dwarven army using specialized anti-arrow ballistas.
It feels more like a complete movie. It doesn't fix the pacing issues, but it makes the battle feel like an actual tactical conflict rather than just a series of random skirmishes. You get to see more of the funeral, which provides the closure the theatrical version desperately needed. Seeing Bilbo return to the Shire after the heartbreak of the mountain is the emotional tether the whole trilogy relies on.
Martin Freeman is the MVP here. Amidst the swirling chaos and exploding towers, his Bilbo Baggins remains the most human thing on screen. His goodbye to the dwarves is understated and perfect. "If any of you are ever passing Bag End, tea is at four. There's plenty of it. You are welcome anytime." It’s a line that brings the whole bloated spectacle back down to earth.
👉 See also: The Name of This Band Is Talking Heads: Why This Live Album Still Beats the Studio Records
What we can learn from the production chaos
The legacy of The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies is a complicated one. It’s a cautionary tale about studio interference and the dangers of "stretching" a story. But it’s also a testament to the sheer willpower of a crew that worked 20-hour days to finish a vision they believed in.
If you're revisiting the film today, try to look past the CGI gold and the weird physics. Look at the performances. Ian McKellen as Gandalf is, as always, a masterclass in acting through layers of prosthetics. The scene where he sits with Bilbo, cleaning his pipe while they both process the trauma they’ve just endured, is worth the price of admission alone.
How to watch it for the best experience
Don't just marathon all three Hobbit movies in one go unless you have a lot of caffeine. They are exhausting. To really appreciate what Jackson was doing with the final chapter:
- Watch the Extended Edition. The extra gore and character beats make the "Five Armies" actually feel like armies.
- Focus on the Thorin/Bilbo dynamic. It’s the spine of the film. Everything else is just noise.
- Pay attention to the score. Howard Shore’s work here is underrated. He weaves in themes from the original trilogy in ways that are subtle and heartbreaking.
- Look for the small details. The practical sets that did exist—like the streets of Dale—are incredibly detailed and beautiful.
The film didn't need to be three hours long. It didn't need a love triangle. But it gave us one last look at a cinematic Middle-earth that we likely won't see again for a long time. For all its flaws, it has a certain chaotic energy that modern, sanitized blockbusters often lack. It’s big, it’s loud, it’s messy, and it’s unapologetically Tolkien-adjacent.
To get the most out of your rewatch, try comparing the "White Council" fight at Dol Guldur to the battles in Lord of the Rings. You’ll see the difference in how magic is portrayed—it's much more "active" in the Hobbit films. Seeing Galadriel go full "Dark Queen" to banish Sauron is a highlight that links the two trilogies together more effectively than any dialogue could.
Ultimately, your enjoyment of the movie depends on your ability to forgive it for not being The Return of the King. It was never going to be that. It’s a different beast—a tragedy wrapped in a war film, based on a book for children. It's a weird mix, but it's ours.