It started with a few quiet deaths in the parish of St. Giles-in-the-Fields. Nobody panicked at first. By the time the summer of 1665 hit its peak, London was a ghost town, or rather, a city of the dying. The Great Plague of London wasn't just a "bad year" for the city; it was a total societal collapse that killed roughly 100,000 people—about a quarter of the population—in just eighteen months.
We’ve all seen the woodcuts of the "plague doctors" with their bird-like masks. You probably think you know the story. Rats, fleas, filth, and the Great Fire of London finally burning the germs away. But the reality is way messier. Honestly, the science and the politics behind the 1665 outbreak are far more terrifying than the myths we learned in primary school.
Why the Great Plague of London Wasn't Just About Rats
Most people blame the black rat (Rattus rattus). It’s the classic villain. But recent archaeological studies and DNA sequencing from "plague pits" like the one found during the Crossrail excavations at Liverpool Street suggest a more complex picture. While Yersinia pestis—the bacterium responsible—definitely traveled via fleas, there’s a massive debate among historians and epidemiologists about how it spread so fast.
Some researchers, like those at the University of Oslo, have suggested that human body lice and respiratory transmission played a much bigger role than we give them credit for. If it were just rats, the spread might have been slower. But in the cramped, timber-framed houses of 17th-century London, people were living on top of each other. Literally.
The Symptom Timeline
It wasn't a quick death. You'd start with a headache. Maybe a fever. Then the "buboes" appeared—hard, painful swellings in the groin, neck, or armpits. If those buboes didn't burst (a process as painful as it sounds), you were basically done for. Internal bleeding followed, leading to the "God’s tokens"—small black spots on the skin that signaled the end was hours away.
The Failed Public Health Response
The government’s plan was, frankly, a disaster. They didn't understand germs. They thought "miasma," or bad air, was the culprit. To fight the smell, people carried nosegays or smoked tobacco. In fact, Eton College reportedly made its students smoke to ward off the plague. Imagine that.
📖 Related: The Human Heart: Why We Get So Much Wrong About How It Works
Then there was the order to kill the dogs and cats.
This was probably the single biggest blunder in the history of English public health. Authorities thought the pets were carrying the disease. By slaughtering hundreds of thousands of dogs and cats, they inadvertently removed the only natural predators of the actual flea-carriers: the rats. The rat population exploded. The plague got worse.
The Shutting Up of Houses
If one person in your house got sick, the "Examiners" would come. They’d bolt your door from the outside. They’d paint a red cross on it with the words "Lord have mercy upon us." You were trapped inside with a dying relative. A watchman stood outside to make sure you didn't escape. It was a death sentence for the healthy members of the family.
Samuel Pepys, whose diary provides the most visceral account of this era, wrote about the "sad sight" of these marked houses. He noted how the streets grew silent, save for the rumbling of the "dead carts" at night.
The Economic Divide: Who Stayed and Who Ran?
The Great Plague of London was a class war.
👉 See also: Ankle Stretches for Runners: What Most People Get Wrong About Mobility
King Charles II and his court fled to Oxford almost immediately. The wealthy merchants moved to their country estates. The people left behind were the ones who couldn't afford to leave—the artisans, the laborers, and the poor. They were the ones who had to deal with the skyrocketing price of bread and the lack of work.
- The Clergy: Many fled, but some stayed behind to minister to the dying, often dying themselves.
- The Doctors: Most "real" doctors left. The "plague doctors" you see in pictures were often second-rate physicians or even frauds trying to make a quick buck off the desperate.
- The Apothecaries: These were the real frontline workers, mixing herbs and remedies that did almost nothing but offer a shred of hope.
Did the Great Fire Actually Save London?
This is the most common myth. The story goes that the 1666 fire was a "cleansing" force that burned down the infested slums and killed the plague.
It’s mostly false.
While the fire did destroy many of the congested areas where the plague thrived, the outbreak was already tapering off by September 1666. More importantly, the plague didn't just happen in the areas that burned. It was in Southwark, in Clerkenwell, and in the outlying parishes that the fire never touched. The plague ended because the weather cooled and the Yersinia pestis bacteria likely hit a point of "burnout" within the specific host population, combined with better (albeit slow) quarantine measures.
Lessons from the Pits
Modern science hasn't finished with the 1665 outbreak. When construction crews found mass graves in 2011, scientists extracted DNA from the dental pulp of the skeletons. This confirmed that the strain was indeed Yersinia pestis, similar to the Black Death of the 1300s but with specific mutations.
✨ Don't miss: Can DayQuil Be Taken At Night: What Happens If You Skip NyQuil
It reminds us that these pathogens don't just disappear. They evolve. They wait for the right conditions—overcrowding, poor sanitation, and slow political response—to strike again.
How to Understand the Legacy of 1665
If you want to truly grasp the scale of what happened, don't just look at the numbers. Look at the shift in the city's psychology.
- Read Primary Sources: Don't just take a textbook's word for it. Read A Journal of the Plague Year by Daniel Defoe. Even though it's historical fiction written years later, it’s based on his uncle’s journals and is incredibly accurate to the atmosphere of the time.
- Trace the Geography: If you're ever in London, visit Bunhill Fields or the small "plague patches" in city churchyards. The ground is often raised several feet higher than the surrounding streets—that’s not landscaping; it’s the sheer volume of bodies buried there.
- Analyze the Data: Look at the "Bills of Mortality." These were the weekly printed statistics of deaths in London. They are some of the earliest examples of big data being used to track a public health crisis. You can see the spike in "Fever" and "Griping in the Guts" as the plague took over.
The Great Plague of London serves as a grim blueprint for how urban centers react to catastrophe. It showed the best and worst of humanity—the courage of the few who stayed to help and the cowardice of those who used their power to escape while leaving the vulnerable to rot. It changed how we think about quarantine, urban planning, and the basic responsibility of a government to its citizens.
To really dive into the data, researchers suggest looking at the work of Graham Twigg, who challenged the "rat-flea" theory in his book The Black Death: A Biological Reappraisal. While controversial, his work pushes us to think about how environmental factors like weather and soil quality might have influenced the spread more than we previously thought. Understanding 1665 isn't just about history; it's about preparing for the next time a quiet death in a single parish turns into a global headline.
Take a moment to look at the digital archives of the Wellcome Collection; they have digitized thousands of documents from the 1660s that show the actual hand-written notes of people trying to survive the impossible. It’s the most direct way to bridge the gap between "historical event" and human tragedy.