In 1906, a British polymath named Francis Galton stepped into a livestock fair in Plymouth. He wasn't there for the prize-winning cattle or the kettle corn. He was there to watch people. Specifically, he was watching eight hundred people try to guess the weight of a slaughtered ox. Galton, who was a bit of an elitist, honestly expected the crowd to be way off. He figured that if you averaged out the guesses of farmers, butchers, and random villagers, you’d get a number that was basically useless.
He was dead wrong.
When he crunched the numbers later, he found the median guess was 1,197 pounds. The actual weight? 1,198 pounds. The crowd was off by 0.08%. That moment became the bedrock of what we now call the genius of the crowd. It’s a phenomenon where the collective intelligence of a diverse group outperforms even the smartest individual experts. It sounds like magic, but it’s actually math.
The Math Behind Why Groups Win
You’ve probably seen this at a wedding with a jar of jellybeans. If you ask one person to guess, they might be off by five hundred. But if you take the average of everyone in the room, you’ll usually land within a few beans of the truth. James Surowiecki, who literally wrote the book on this called The Wisdom of Crowds, argues that for this to work, you need four things: diversity of opinion, independence, decentralization, and a way to turn private judgments into a collective decision.
If everyone is just copying each other, the system breaks. That’s how you get stock market bubbles or weird internet lynch mobs.
But when people think for themselves? That's where the "genius" part kicks in. Think about it this way: every person has some information and some "noise" (errors) in their head. When you average a thousand people, the random errors cancel each other out. The information stays. It's like a statistical filter that leaves you with the truth.
🔗 Read more: Where Did Dow Close Today: Why the Market is Stalling Near 50,000
Real-World Wins: Beyond the Ox
This isn't just about guessing the weight of farm animals or jellybeans in a jar. It’s how the modern world actually functions.
Look at Wikipedia. Early on, experts laughed at it. How could a bunch of random people on the internet write an encyclopedia that was better than Britannica? Well, they did. Because the "genius of the crowd" means that for every person who adds a typo or a fake fact, there are ten more people ready to fix it. A 2005 study in Nature found that Wikipedia was almost as accurate as Britannica on science topics, and since then, the gap has only closed further as the crowd grew.
Then there’s the stock market. Now, the market isn't perfect—clearly—but it’s basically a massive, real-time machine for the genius of the crowd. Millions of people are "voting" with their money on what a company is worth.
Prediction Markets and the Future
Ever heard of Polymarket or PredictIt? These are prediction markets where people bet on the outcomes of elections, sports, or even scientific breakthroughs. They are often more accurate than traditional polls. Why? Because people are putting their money where their mouth is. If you're wrong, you lose cash. That financial pressure forces the crowd to be more honest and rigorous than they would be in a phone survey.
During the 1986 Challenger shuttle disaster, something eerie happened. Within minutes of the explosion, the stock market "knew" who was responsible. While NASA was still forming a committee, the stock prices of the four main contractors dropped. But three of them recovered quickly. Only one—Morton Thiokol—stayed down. It took months for the official investigation to prove that Morton Thiokol’s O-rings were the cause. The crowd figured it out in under an hour just by processing tiny bits of information from thousands of different traders.
💡 You might also like: Reading a Crude Oil Barrel Price Chart Without Losing Your Mind
Why "Experts" Often Lose
It’s kinda bruising to the ego of the "expert" class, but specialists are often too close to the problem. Philip Tetlock, a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, conducted a famous twenty-year study on political and economic forecasting. He found that the "experts" were barely better than a dart-throwing chimpanzee.
Why? Because experts tend to be "hedgehogs"—they know one big thing and try to fit every problem into that framework. The crowd, however, is a collection of "foxes." They know many little things. They see the angles the expert misses because they aren't blinded by a single, elegant theory.
When the Crowd Turns into a Mob
Let's be real: the crowd isn't always a genius. Sometimes it's a total moron.
If you've ever seen a "bank run" or a panic on social media, you’ve seen the dark side. This happens when independence is lost. If I'm only guessing because I heard you guess, we aren't two data points anymore. We’re just one data point and an echo. This is called a "social cascade."
The genius of the crowd only exists when people have different sources of information. If we all watch the same news channel and read the same Twitter threads, our "crowd" loses its power. We just become a mob. Groupthink is the literal poison that kills collective intelligence. To get the genius, you need the weirdos, the outliers, and the people who disagree with the room.
📖 Related: Is US Stock Market Open Tomorrow? What to Know for the MLK Holiday Weekend
Harnessing the Genius of the Crowd in Your Life
You don't need a livestock fair to use this. You can apply the principles of collective intelligence to your business or even your personal decisions.
Stop looking for the "one right answer" from one person. If you're hiring for a role, don't just trust your gut. Have five different people interview the candidate separately and don't let them talk to each other until they've all submitted their scores. That independence is the secret sauce. If they talk first, the loudest person in the room will influence everyone else, and you've just lost the genius of the group.
Actionable Steps for Better Collective Decisions
- Prioritize Diversity: If everyone in the room has the same degree, the same background, and the same hobbies, your "crowd" is just one person in five bodies. Seek out the person who disagrees with you.
- Blind Your Data: If you want a group's honest opinion on a project, have them write their thoughts down before anyone speaks. This prevents "anchoring," where the first person to talk sets the tone for everyone else.
- Aggregate, Don't Compromise: Don't try to reach a consensus where everyone agrees. Just take the average. Consensus often leads to the lowest common denominator. Averages lead to the truth.
- Use Micro-Predictions: Instead of asking "Will this project succeed?", ask ten people to give you a percentage chance of success. Average those percentages. You'll be shocked at how often that number is right.
The genius of the crowd teaches us that nobody is as smart as everybody. It’s a humbling thought, honestly. We like to imagine ourselves as the hero of the story, the one with the vision. But the data says otherwise. If you want to know the truth—whether it’s the weight of an ox or the next big shift in the tech market—you’re better off listening to the quiet hum of the many rather than the loud shout of the one.
Check the information sources you rely on. If they all sound the same, you're not getting the wisdom; you're just getting the echo. To find the genius, you have to find the crowd.
Next Steps for Implementation
- Audit your decision-making process. Identify one recurring meeting where "the boss" speaks first. Flip the script: everyone submits a written opinion via email before the meeting starts.
- Broaden your input. Next time you face a complex problem, deliberately ask three people outside your department for their "dumb" take. You're looking for the information they have that you've filtered out.
- Trust the aggregate. If you’re using a rating system (like Amazon reviews or glassdoor), stop looking for the one-star or five-star rants. Look at the mean and the distribution. The "genius" is in the middle of the curve, not the edges.