It started with the smell of garlic. Then apples. Sometimes rotting garbage. People in the village of Halabja actually leaned in to sniff the air, thinking it was something strange but maybe harmless, until their skin began to blister and their lungs turned to liquid. This wasn't just a "tragedy" in the vague way history books like to describe things. It was a calculated, state-sponsored attempt to wipe a specific group of people off the map. When we talk about the gassing of the Kurds, we’re talking about the 1988 Anfal campaign, a series of attacks led by Ali Hassan al-Majid—better known as "Chemical Ali"—under the orders of Saddam Hussein.
It’s heavy stuff. Honestly, it’s hard to wrap your head around the fact that this happened while the rest of the world mostly watched or, in some cases, provided the chemicals used to do it.
The Anfal campaign wasn't just one bad day. It was eight distinct stages of systematic destruction. The Iraqi government viewed the Kurds as a "fifth column" during the Iran-Iraq War, accusing them of siding with Tehran. But the response wasn't a standard military engagement. It was a "scorched earth" policy. They didn't just want to defeat the Peshmerga fighters; they wanted to erase the Kurdish rural way of life. Over 4,000 villages were literally bulldozed. If you were a Kurd living in the "prohibited zones," you were basically a target by default.
Why the Gassing of the Kurds Was a Turning Point in Warfare
Most people focus on Halabja because of the sheer scale. On March 16, 1988, Iraqi jets flew over the city and dropped a cocktail of mustard gas, sarin, and tabun. Roughly 5,000 people died almost instantly. But Halabja was actually a bit of an outlier—it was a large city. Most of the gassing of the Kurds happened in small, remote mountain villages where there were no cameras and no journalists.
The strategy was brutal: use chemical weapons to create panic, flush people out of their homes, and then round them up. Once captured, the men and boys were often separated from the women and elderly. Thousands were taken to "collection points" like Topzawa and then vanished. We now know many were executed in mass pits in the southern deserts of Iraq.
🔗 Read more: The Faces Leopard Eating Meme: Why People Still Love Watching Regret in Real Time
Human Rights Watch researcher Middle East Watch (now part of HRW) did some of the most grueling groundwork in the early 90s, uncovering documents left behind during the Kurdish uprising. These papers weren't some secret conspiracy theory; they were official Iraqi bureaucratic records. They detailed the distribution of "special ammunition"—the regime's euphemism for gas.
The Role of International Silence
You’ve gotta wonder why nobody stopped it. Well, the 1980s were a weird time geopolitically. The U.S. and many European nations were more worried about Iran winning the war than they were about Saddam’s internal human rights record.
- The Supply Chain: German, French, and even American companies were involved in selling Iraq the precursors for chemical agents or the dual-use technology needed to make them.
- The UN Response: For a long time, the international community played a game of "bothsidesism," suggesting that maybe Iran was responsible for the gas attacks too, despite evidence clearly pointing to Baghdad.
- The Aftermath: It took years for the term "genocide" to be legally applied to these events.
The survivors didn't just deal with the immediate deaths. Mustard gas is a "gift" that keeps on giving. It causes long-term genetic damage, permanent blindness, and skyrocketing rates of cancer and birth defects. In places like Halabja, the soil and water were contaminated for years, making the very act of living there a slow-motion health crisis.
The Anfal Campaign: More Than Just Gas
While the chemicals get the headlines, the Anfal campaign was a massive logistics operation. It wasn't just about the gassing of the Kurds; it was about the "Arabization" of northern Iraq. After the villages were cleared, the government moved in Arab settlers to change the demographics of oil-rich areas like Kirkuk. This created a legacy of land disputes that still causes violence today.
💡 You might also like: Whos Winning The Election Rn Polls: The January 2026 Reality Check
Joost Hiltermann, a leading expert on the massacre, has written extensively about how the Iraqi regime used the cover of war to settle an internal ethnic "problem." The brutality was the point. They wanted the Kurds to know that they were never safe, not even in the highest mountains.
It's sorta crazy how little this is taught in mainstream history outside of the Middle East. We hear about the Holocaust or Rwanda, but Anfal often gets relegated to a footnote of the Iran-Iraq War. Yet, it was one of the first times a state used chemical weapons against its own citizens on such a massive scale.
What Most People Get Wrong About the 1988 Attacks
One of the biggest misconceptions is that the Kurds were just "caught in the crossfire." That's simply not true. The Iraqi Air Force didn't miss its targets; it hit exactly what it meant to hit. Another myth is that Saddam acted alone. While he was the architect, he had a massive infrastructure of soldiers, intelligence officers, and international suppliers who made it possible.
The legal battle for recognition is still ongoing. The Iraqi Special Tribunal eventually convicted Chemical Ali and others, but for many survivors, the "justice" felt late and incomplete. They still live with the scars—both physical and psychological.
📖 Related: Who Has Trump Pardoned So Far: What Really Happened with the 47th President's List
How to Help and Learn More
If you actually want to understand the impact of the gassing of the Kurds, you shouldn't just read dry reports. Look for the stories.
- Visit the Halabja Memorial: If you ever find yourself in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, the museum there is a gut-wrenching but necessary experience. It houses the remains of the victims and the artifacts of that day.
- Read "A People Betrayed": There are several books by journalists like Jonathan Randal or researchers from Human Rights Watch that detail the granular reality of the 1980s.
- Support Organizations: Groups like the HALO Trust or local Kurdish NGOs work on clearing remnants of war and providing medical care to the aging survivor population.
- Follow the Legal Precedents: Keep an eye on how international courts handle chemical warfare today. The "red lines" established (or ignored) in Iraq in 1988 directly influenced how the world responded to chemical use in Syria decades later.
The history of the gassing of the Kurds serves as a grim reminder of what happens when the world prioritizes political stability over human life. It’s not just a Kurdish story; it’s a warning about the fragility of international law.
To really grasp the scope, look at the numbers: 182,000 estimated deaths during the whole Anfal operation. That's not just a statistic. That's 182,000 individual lives—farmers, teachers, kids—who were snuffed out because of where they were born and the language they spoke.
Actionable Next Steps for Further Research
- Primary Source Check: Search for the "Anfal Files" archived by Human Rights Watch. These are the actual captured Iraqi documents that proved the intent to commit genocide.
- Geographic Context: Open a map and look at the "Prohibited Zones" of 1987-1988. Notice how they correlate with the oil fields of Kirkuk and the border regions.
- Documentary View: Watch "The Silent Witness," which follows survivors of the gas attacks as they navigate life decades later.
- Advocacy: Contact your local representatives to ask about their stance on recognizing the Anfal campaign as a formal genocide if your country hasn't done so already. International recognition helps survivors access specific reparations and psychological support.