History is usually written by the winners, and in the case of the Free Territory of Ukraine, the winners were the Bolsheviks. They didn’t just win the war; they spent decades scrubbing the "Makhnovshchina" from the history books or, worse, painting it as a chaotic band of drunken bandits. But if you actually look at what happened in southeastern Ukraine between 1918 and 1921, you find something much more complex. It wasn't just a military campaign. It was a massive, messy, and arguably successful experiment in radical statelessness.
Nestled in the Gulyai-Pole region, this was a place where millions of people tried to live without a central government during one of the most violent periods in human history.
Imagine the Russian Civil War. It’s a nightmare. You have the "Whites" (monarchists and nationalists) coming from one side and the "Reds" (Bolsheviks) from the other. In the middle of this, a short, charismatic guy with long hair named Nestor Makhno decides he’s had enough of both. He organizes a "Black Army" to fight for the peasants. Honestly, it sounds like the plot of a movie, but it was the gritty reality for roughly seven million people at its peak.
Why the Free Territory of Ukraine wasn't just "Chaos"
When people hear "anarchy," they think of fires in the streets and no rules. That’s not what the Free Territory of Ukraine was about. It was based on the ideas of Peter Kropotkin—basically, the belief that people can organize themselves through voluntary communes and worker councils.
People didn't just stop working. In places like Gulyai-Pole, peasants finally owned the land they worked on, not because a government gave it to them, but because they took it and agreed to share it. They set up "Free Soviets." These weren't the top-down, party-controlled soviets you’d see later in the USSR. These were local meetings where people actually voted on how to run their own villages.
The economy was weird but functional. They used various currencies, including their own printed notes, though mostly it was a barter-and-credit system among the communes. If a village produced grain and a town produced shoes, they traded. No middleman. No tax man. It was rudimentary, sure, but it kept people fed while the rest of the former Russian Empire was starving.
🔗 Read more: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?
The Black Army: Guerilla Warfare 101
You can't have a territory in a war zone without a way to defend it. The Revolutionary Insurrectionary Army of Ukraine—the Black Army—was terrifyingly effective. They invented the tachanka.
What is a tachanka? Basically, it's a horse-drawn carriage with a heavy machine gun bolted to the back. It was the technical of the 1920s.
Makhno’s troops were incredibly mobile. They could cover sixty miles a day, strike a White Army supply line, and vanish back into the peasantry before anyone knew what happened. Because the soldiers were local farmers, they knew every ravine and forest. They had the ultimate home-field advantage.
The Bolshevik Betrayal
This is where the story gets dark. The Free Territory of Ukraine actually helped the Bolsheviks win the war. When the White General Denikin was marching on Moscow, it was Makhno’s army that cut his supply lines and forced a retreat.
Lenin and Trotsky knew they couldn't beat the Whites without the anarchists. So, they made alliances. They promised autonomy. They signed treaties.
💡 You might also like: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
Then they broke them.
Once the "White" threat was neutralized, Trotsky decided that an independent, anarchist pocket in Ukraine was a threat to the centralized power of the Communist Party. He famously stated that it was better to have the Whites in power than to let the Makhnovists continue their experiment. In 1920, the Red Army turned its guns on its former allies. They invited Makhno’s commanders to a "joint planning meeting" and then arrested or executed them.
It wasn't a fair fight. The Red Army had a state’s worth of resources. The Free Territory was a collection of war-weary villages. By 1921, the experiment was crushed. Makhno fled to Paris, where he ended up working as a carpenter and a stagehand at the Opera, dying in poverty.
Common Misconceptions and Nuances
Look, it wasn't a utopia.
Some historians, like Voline (who was actually there), admit there were serious issues. War makes people brutal. There were summary executions of "class enemies" and collaborators. While Makhno himself was famously anti-Semitic and punished his own soldiers for pogroms, the chaos of the era meant that anti-Jewish violence still occurred in the region, often perpetrated by rogue units or local gangs that claimed the "Black" flag but didn't follow the ideology.
📖 Related: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
Also, the "freedom" was often dictated by the needs of the front line. You can't have a purely voluntary society when an armored train is barreling toward your village. The Black Army had to "requisition" supplies, which, let’s be honest, is just a fancy word for taking them.
The Legacy: More Than Just a Footnote
Why does a century-old failed state matter in 2026?
Because the Free Territory of Ukraine remains the largest-scale implementation of anarchist principles in modern history, alongside Revolutionary Catalonia in the 1930s. It proved that millions of people could, for a time, organize a society without a central state, even under the most extreme pressure.
It also highlights the long-standing tension between Ukrainian autonomy and Russian centralization. Whether it was the Tsar, Lenin, or modern-day Moscow, the desire for Ukraine to be a "free territory" has been a recurring theme for hundreds of years.
How to Learn More About This Period
If you're tired of the sanitized version of history, you've got to go to the primary sources.
- Nestor Makhno's Memoirs: He wrote three volumes while in exile. They are passionate, defensive, and give you a window into his headspace.
- The Unknown Revolution by Voline: This is probably the best intellectual look at the movement. Voline was an anarchist intellectual who worked closely with Makhno.
- Peter Arshinov’s History of the Makhnovist Movement: Arshinov was the movement’s primary historian and provides the most detailed military accounts.
Actionable Steps for History Buffs
To truly understand the Free Territory of Ukraine, don't just read one Wikipedia page.
- Compare the Maps: Look at maps of the Eastern Front from 1919. Note where Gulyai-Pole is located. It’s the crossroads of everything. Seeing the geography explains why they were hit from all sides.
- Audit the "Bandit" Narrative: Whenever you read a source that calls the Makhnovists "mere bandits," check the author’s bias. Soviet-era sources are notoriously skewed to justify the Red Army’s eventual invasion of the territory.
- Trace the Ideology: Read Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread. It’s the "manual" Makhno was trying to follow. Seeing the gap between the theory and the reality of the Ukrainian steppe is a masterclass in political science.
- Explore the Cultural Impact: Look into how Makhno is viewed in modern Ukraine. He went from being a "traitor" in Soviet times to a complex folk hero today, with statues and museums dedicated to his memory in Gulyai-Pole.
Understanding this era isn't just about memorizing dates. It's about seeing how people behave when the world falls apart and they have to build something new from the wreckage. The Free Territory of Ukraine was a brief, violent, but deeply earnest attempt to live differently. Even if it failed, the fact that it existed at all is a miracle of human organization.