Most rom-coms end at the altar. You get the big kiss, the swell of orchestral music, and the screen fades to black just as the couple starts their "happily ever after." But The Five-Year Engagement does something way more honest. It looks at the mess that happens when life just keeps getting in the way of a wedding.
Honestly, it’s a bit of a miracle this movie exists in the way it does. Released in 2012, it reunited Jason Segel and director Nicholas Stoller, the duo behind Forgetting Sarah Marshall. But while Sarah Marshall was about the explosive aftermath of a breakup, this movie is about the slow, grinding erosion of a relationship caused by geography, career ambition, and the weird guilt that comes with "supporting" a partner.
The Brutal Reality of Career Compromise
The plot is pretty straightforward. Tom (Jason Segel) is a rising star chef in San Francisco. Violet (Emily Blunt) is a PhD student. They get engaged. It’s cute. It’s easy. Then Violet gets a post-doc position at the University of Michigan.
This is where the movie gets real.
Tom agrees to move to Ann Arbor. He thinks he’s being the "good guy." He tells himself he can cook anywhere. But Ann Arbor isn't San Francisco. He goes from making high-end molecular gastronomy to slicing cold cuts at a local deli. He grows a "depression beard." He starts hunting deer. He becomes a person neither he nor Violet recognizes.
It’s painful to watch because it’s so common. We’ve all seen that couple where one person moves for the other's job, promising it won't change anything. It always changes everything. The resentment doesn't happen overnight; it’s a slow leak.
Why the Humor Works (And Why It Doesn't)
The movie is long. Like, two-hours-and-four-minutes long. For a comedy, that’s usually a death sentence. Some critics at the time, like Roger Ebert, pointed out that the pacing felt heavy. But that’s almost the point? The movie feels like a long engagement. You feel the years passing. You feel the seasons in Michigan changing from gray to grayer.
👉 See also: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
The supporting cast is genuinely insane when you look back at it.
- Chris Pratt plays the best friend, Alex. This was pre-Marvel, "Parks and Rec" era Pratt. He’s loud, he’s unfiltered, and he’s the foil to Tom’s misery.
- Alison Brie plays Violet’s sister, Suzie, doing a hilariously forced British accent that somehow works perfectly with Emily Blunt’s actual British accent.
- Minday Kaling and Randall Park show up as fellow academics.
There’s a scene where Pratt’s character performs a "tribute" song at a funeral that involves a slideshow of his own sexual conquests. It’s cringeworthy. It’s absurd. It’s exactly what you need to break up the tension of Tom and Violet’s slow-motion train wreck.
The Gender Dynamics Nobody Talks About
Back in 2012, a lot of romantic comedies still relied on the "man-child" trope. You know the one. The guy who won't grow up and the woman who has to fix him. The Five-Year Engagement flips that script. Tom is actually very mature at the start. He’s successful. He’s planned.
The conflict arises because Violet is the one with the upward trajectory. The movie asks a question that few mainstream comedies were asking then: Can a high-achieving man truly be happy being the "trailing spouse" to a high-achieving woman?
Tom tries. He really does. But the loss of his identity as a chef breaks him. He starts making mead. He gets obsessed with knitting. It’s funny, sure, but it’s also a portrait of a man losing his sense of purpose. It highlights a specific kind of ego bruise that happens when your partner is thriving in the very place that is stifling you.
Location as a Character
San Francisco and Ann Arbor are presented as polar opposites. San Francisco is golden, vibrant, and represents Tom’s peak. Ann Arbor is depicted as a snowy, academic purgatory.
✨ Don't miss: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
Is that fair to Michigan? Probably not. But in the context of the film, it works as a visual metaphor for their relationship. The cold represents the cooling of their passion. The isolation of the Midwest represents how far they’ve drifted from the people they were when they first said "yes."
What We Can Learn From the "Failed" Wedding Dates
If you’ve ever planned a wedding, you know the stress. The guest list, the venue, the "save the dates." In The Five-Year Engagement, the wedding date keeps moving.
Every time they push the date back, it feels like a mini-death. It’s a signal that the relationship is no longer the priority. Life—in the form of tenure tracks, family deaths, and unplanned pregnancies—keeps shoving itself to the front of the line.
The movie suggests that there is no "perfect time." If you wait for the stars to align, for both careers to be stable, and for all the family drama to resolve, you’ll be engaged for five years, or ten, or forever.
The Turning Point: The Elmo Voice Fight
One of the most famous scenes is the argument they have while using Sesame Street voices. Violet is Elmo. Tom is Cookie Monster. They are screaming at each other about infidelity and unhappiness, but they’re doing it in high-pitched puppet voices because they’re at a kid’s birthday party.
It’s a masterclass in writing. It shows how couples often have to perform "happiness" for others while they are rotting on the inside. It’s absurdly funny and deeply uncomfortable. You’re laughing, but you’re also thinking, "I have been there." Not the Elmo part, hopefully, but the part where you’re forced to pretend everything is fine while your world is falling apart.
🔗 Read more: Who is Really in the Enola Holmes 2 Cast? A Look at the Faces Behind the Mystery
Real-World Takeaways for Your Own Relationship
Look, this isn't just a movie review. There are actual psychological hurdles presented here that most couples face but don't know how to label.
- The Trailing Spouse Syndrome: If you move for your partner, you need a plan for your own identity. You cannot live solely through their success. Tom’s mistake wasn't moving; it was moving without a clear path for his own career.
- Resentment is Quiet: It doesn't start with a scream. It starts with a sigh. It starts with Tom looking at a deer he shot and realizing he'd rather be in a kitchen in California.
- The "Good Guy" Trap: Tom thought that by sacrificing his career, he earned "points." But relationships aren't a scoreboard. When he eventually threw his sacrifice in Violet's face, it didn't matter that he had been "noble." It just mattered that he was bitter.
Where to Watch It Now
Currently, The Five-Year Engagement is often available on platforms like Max (formerly HBO Max) or for rent on Amazon and Apple TV. It has aged surprisingly well. Unlike many 2010s comedies that rely on dated references, the core conflict of balancing love and ambition is timeless.
It reminds us that a wedding is just a day. The engagement is the trial run. And sometimes, the trial run tells you exactly what you need to know, even if it takes five years to hear it.
Actionable Steps for Navigating Long-Term Commitments
- Audit Your Sacrifices: If you are making a major life change for a partner, sit down and write out what you need to feel fulfilled in the new location. Don't just "wing it" like Tom.
- Set a Hard Deadline: If you're engaged and keep pushing the date, ask why. Is it logistics, or is it a fundamental doubt about the union? Setting a "non-negotiable" date can force necessary conversations.
- Check the Ego: If your partner is currently the "breadwinner" or the one with the career momentum, acknowledge it openly. Don't let it turn into the "depression beard" phase. Talk about how to rebalance the scales in the future.
The movie ends with a wedding that is small, chaotic, and completely unplanned. It’s perfect because it’s messy. It’s a reminder that the "happily ever after" doesn't require a five-year plan; it just requires two people who are willing to stop waiting for life to be easy and start living it as it is.