The First 48 Killed by Command: What Really Happened in the Memphis Case

The First 48 Killed by Command: What Really Happened in the Memphis Case

Cold cases aren't always about a lack of evidence. Sometimes, they're about the crushing weight of silence. In the world of true crime television, few episodes carry as much heavy, lingering tension as the one involving the "Killed by Command" investigation, documented by the long-running series The First 48.

It’s Season 19, Episode 10. Or, if you’re looking at the production logs, Episode 466.

The case centers on a brutal double homicide in Memphis, Tennessee. It’s a story that basically strips away the Hollywood gloss of detective work and replaces it with the grit of a rainy Memphis night and the reality of gang dynamics. When we talk about The First 48 Killed by Command, we aren't just talking about a TV title; we are talking about the deaths of two men, the terror of a neighborhood, and a motive that feels like something out of a dark noir film.

The Rain and the Shell Casings

The scene was chaotic. Memphis Police Department (MPD) detectives were called to a residential street where two men had been gunned down. Rain was pouring. If you’ve ever watched the show, you know rain is a detective's worst enemy. It washes away DNA. It smears blood patterns. It makes the already difficult job of "the first 48 hours" almost impossible.

The victims were identified as 22-year-old Montrell "Monty" Smith and 20-year-old Deante "D-Tay" Thompson.

Detectives found dozens of shell casings. This wasn't a robbery gone wrong. This wasn't a heat-of-the-moment argument that escalated into a single shot. This was a targeted execution. A "command" hit.

The investigation, led by veteran homicide detectives like Fausto Frias and the Memphis team, quickly shifted from processing physical evidence to navigating the complex social web of North Memphis. Honestly, the physical evidence was sparse because of the weather, so the case rested almost entirely on street intelligence.

Why "Killed by Command" is Different

Most homicides are personal. They are about money, jealousy, or a sudden burst of rage. But the The First 48 Killed by Command case introduced a much more chilling element: the hierarchy of street gangs.

✨ Don't miss: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think

The theory that emerged early on was that the victims were targeted because of an order from someone higher up the chain. In Memphis, like many major cities, gang structures can be rigid. If a "command" is issued, it must be followed, or the person tasked with the hit becomes a target themselves.

Detectives were looking for more than just a shooter. They were looking for the architect.

They started interviewing witnesses, but people were terrified. You could see it in their faces on camera—the way they looked over their shoulders even while sitting in a secure police interview room. That’s the reality of these cases. It’s not just about "snitching." It’s about the very real threat of becoming the next victim of a command.

The Turning Point in the Investigation

Digital footprints eventually became the key. In the modern era, even the most disciplined gang members leave a trail. Detectives began scouring cell phone records and social media posts. They found that the victims had been lured.

They weren't just randomly walking down the street. They were told to meet someone.

As the clock ticked toward that 48-hour mark—the window where the chances of solving a murder drop by 50%—the detectives got a break. A witness, feeling the pressure and perhaps a bit of guilt, began to talk. This led the MPD to focus on a group of individuals associated with a specific local set.

The "command" wasn't just a metaphor. It was a literal instruction given over a burner phone.

🔗 Read more: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened

The Reality of Memphis Crime Statistics

To understand the weight of this episode, you have to look at the environment. In the years surrounding the filming of this episode, Memphis was grappling with a massive surge in violent crime.

  • In 2019, the year this episode roughly aligns with, Memphis saw nearly 200 homicides.
  • A significant percentage of these were classified as gang-related or retaliatory.
  • The clearance rate—the rate at which police "solve" a crime—often hovered around 40-50% for homicides, which is why the work shown in the show is so high-stakes.

When people search for information on the The First 48 Killed by Command, they’re often looking for a sense of justice. Did they catch the guy? The answer is complex. In this specific case, arrests were made, but the legal process for gang-ordered hits is notoriously long. Witnesses often recant when they get to the grand jury. Evidence that seems "iron-clad" on a Tuesday can vanish by the time a trial starts three years later.

What Most People Get Wrong About This Episode

Social media is full of theories about what happens after the cameras stop rolling. One common misconception is that the "first 48" is the only time police work on a case.

That’s not true.

The 48 hours is just the timeframe where leads are "fresh." After that, the case moves into the "long game." In the "Killed by Command" case, the work continued for months. Detectives had to piece together the hierarchy of the gang involved. They had to prove that the shooter didn't act alone, but on behalf of a larger organization. That requires racketeering knowledge, not just homicide investigation.

Another mistake? Thinking the detectives always "know" who did it right away. In this episode, you see the genuine frustration of the MPD. They have names, but they don't have proof. There is a massive difference between knowing a guy is a killer and being able to convince a jury of twelve people beyond a reasonable doubt.

The Human Cost

We watch these shows for the drama, but the families of Montrell Smith and Deante Thompson live with the reality every day. The "Killed by Command" narrative highlights a tragic trend in urban violence: young men being used as pawns by older, more manipulative figures in criminal organizations.

💡 You might also like: What Category Was Harvey? The Surprising Truth Behind the Number

It's a cycle. A command is given. A life is taken. A shooter goes to prison. A new commander takes over.

If you’re looking for the current status of the individuals involved in the The First 48 Killed by Command case, the best resource is the Shelby County Criminal Court Clerk's website. You can search by the names mentioned in the episode.

Note that many of these cases result in plea bargains. Why? Because the "command" structure makes it hard to prosecute the top-level bosses. Prosecutors often offer the shooter a deal to testify against the person who gave the order. It's a "deal with the devil" that many find hard to stomach, but it's often the only way to dismantle the organization.

Actionable Steps for True Crime Enthusiasts

If you are following this case or others like it, there are ways to engage that go beyond just watching the TV show.

Verify the Details
Don't rely solely on the edited version of events shown on A&E. Television requires a narrative arc; reality is messy. Use local news archives from the Daily Memphian or The Commercial Appeal to see how the case was reported at the time of the arrests.

Understand the Legal Hurdles
Research the "Rules of Evidence" in Tennessee. It helps explain why some people who seem "guilty" on camera are never convicted. Understanding things like hearsay rules and witness intimidation statutes provides a much clearer picture of why justice takes so long.

Support Community Resources
The best way to stop "command" killings is to break the cycle of gang recruitment. Organizations in Memphis like 901 Bloq Party or local youth mentorship programs are on the front lines. They work to provide young men with alternatives to the "command" structure that leads to the tragedy seen in Episode 466.

The legacy of The First 48 Killed by Command isn't just a high-ranking episode of a popular show. It's a reminder of the fragility of life in communities where the law of the street often speaks louder than the law of the land. It’s a call to look closer at the systemic issues that allow "commands" to be given in the first place.