The East Los Angeles Walkouts: What Most People Get Wrong About the 1968 Blowouts

The East Los Angeles Walkouts: What Most People Get Wrong About the 1968 Blowouts

It’s March 1968. You’re a teenager at Lincoln High. You’re sitting in a classroom where the ceiling is literally peeling, your textbooks are twenty years out of date, and your counselor just told you—to your face—that you aren't "college material." He says you should probably just look into upholstery or maybe a trade. This wasn't some isolated incident or a bad day at the office. This was the lived reality for thousands of Mexican-American students in the Los Angeles Unified School District. It was a pressure cooker. Eventually, that lid was gonna fly off.

The East Los Angeles walkouts, or the "Blowouts" as the kids called them, weren't just a random protest. They were a tactical, massive, and honestly terrifyingly brave strike by high schoolers who were tired of being treated like second-class citizens in their own zip codes. We're talking about 15,000 to 20,000 students from schools like Garfield, Roosevelt, Lincoln, Belmont, and Wilson all walking out of class. At the same time.

Why the East Los Angeles Walkouts Actually Happened

People think this was just about "better schools." That’s a massive oversimplification that ignores the grit of the era. The drop-out rate—or "push-out rate," as many activists more accurately call it—was sitting at nearly 60 percent. 60 percent. Imagine more than half your friends just disappearing from the roster before graduation because the system was designed to fail them.

The schools in East L.A. were overcrowded. While white schools on the Westside had shiny new facilities and advanced placement tracks, kids in the Eastside were being funneled into "industrial arts." Basically, the district was training them to be cheap labor. They weren't allowed to speak Spanish in the halls; if they did, they got swatted or humiliated. Teachers often held deep-seated prejudices, sometimes openly calling students "lazy" or "dumb" based on their surnames.

Then comes Sal Castro. He was a social studies teacher at Lincoln High School. He didn't just teach history; he lived it. He saw what was happening and realized the kids needed more than just a lecture. They needed a movement. He started mentoring students like Paula Crisostomo and Moctesuma Esparza, helping them organize. They didn't just complain. They made a list. 36 demands, to be exact. They wanted bilingual education, Mexican-American history in the curriculum, and for the janitorial work at schools to be done by janitors, not as "punishment" for students.

🔗 Read more: Elecciones en Honduras 2025: ¿Quién va ganando realmente según los últimos datos?

The Week the Schools Stood Still

It started on March 1, 1968, at Wilson High. It wasn't supposed to start then, but the principal had just canceled a student play, and the frustration boiled over. By March 6, it was a full-blown revolution. Thousands of kids streamed out of the gates. They yelled "Chicano Power!" and carried signs demanding justice.

It’s easy to look back and think it was all cheers and empowerment, but it was violent. The LAPD didn't just watch. They showed up in riot gear. There are photos of officers with batons swinging at teenagers in school sweaters. At Roosevelt High, the police blocked the exits, trapped students, and started beating them. This wasn't a "peaceful assembly" in the eyes of the law; it was a riot. But to the kids, it was their first time feeling like they actually had a voice.

The walkouts lasted over a week. Parents, many of whom were initially scared their kids would get expelled or arrested, eventually joined in. They formed the United Mexican American Students (UMAS) and the Educational Issues Coordinating Committee (EICC). They realized their kids were right. The system was broken.

The state didn't take this lying down. In June 1968, the authorities went after the leaders. They indicted 13 men—including Sal Castro and Carlos Muñoz Jr.—on conspiracy charges. Specifically, conspiracy to "disturb the peace." It was a heavy-handed attempt to decapitate the movement. If convicted, these guys were looking at 66 years in prison.

💡 You might also like: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving

The "Eastside 13" became a rallying cry. The community wasn't intimidated; they were pissed. Protests moved from the schools to the streets in front of the Hall of Justice. Eventually, the California Court of Appeals dropped the charges in 1970, citing the First Amendment. It was a landmark win for free speech, but it took two years of legal hell to get there.

What the Walkouts Actually Changed (And What They Didn't)

If you look at the statistics immediately following the East Los Angeles walkouts, you might feel a bit let down. The school board made a lot of promises they didn't keep right away. Change was slow. Painfully slow.

However, the ripple effect was massive. Before 1968, the idea of "Chicano" identity was still forming in the public consciousness. This event solidified it. It led to:

  • A massive spike in Mexican-American enrollment at UCLA and other universities.
  • The creation of Chicano Studies departments across the country.
  • The rise of a new generation of political leaders who realized that if they wanted change, they had to run for office themselves.
  • More Latinx teachers and administrators being hired by LAUSD, though the numbers still haven't fully caught up to the student population even today.

Honestly, the most important change was psychological. For the first time, a marginalized community in Los Angeles realized they could shut down the city's infrastructure to demand their rights. They learned that the "powers that be" were vulnerable to organized, collective action.

📖 Related: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think

Common Misconceptions About the 1968 Blowouts

Some people think these were "anti-war" protests. While the Chicano Moratorium (which focused on the Vietnam War) happened later, the 1968 walkouts were strictly about education. Another myth is that it was just a "student prank" or kids looking for an excuse to ditch class. You don't face down a police baton just to skip a math quiz. These kids were risking their entire futures.

There’s also a tendency to credit only the men. While Sal Castro was pivotal, the movement was largely organized by young women. Paula Crisostomo, Vickie Castro, and others were the ones on the ground, making the phone calls, printing the fliers, and keeping the momentum alive when things got scary.

Why This History Matters in 2026

We're still seeing the same debates today. Funding disparities between school districts, the lack of diverse representation in curriculum, and the "school-to-prison pipeline" are all modern echoes of the 1968 struggle. The East Los Angeles walkouts proved that students aren't just "customers" of an education system—they are its primary stakeholders.

If you’re looking to understand why L.A. looks the way it does today, you have to look at the Eastside in '68. You can't understand the city without it. It was the moment the Mexican-American community decided they were no longer going to be the "invisible minority."


Actionable Steps to Learn More

  1. Visit the Chicano Studies Research Center at UCLA. They hold many of the primary documents, photos, and oral histories from the walkout era.
  2. Watch the 2006 HBO film Walkout. While it’s a dramatization, it was produced by Moctesuma Esparza (one of the original organizers) and captures the visceral tension of the events.
  3. Read Chicano Manifesto by Armando Rendón. It provides the broader ideological context of what the Chicano movement was trying to achieve beyond just school reform.
  4. Explore the LAUSD archives. Compare the 36 demands made by the students in 1968 to current school board policies. It's a fascinating—and sometimes frustrating—look at how much (or little) has shifted in terms of administrative accountability.