It is easily the best "worst" movie ever made. When Tommy Wiseau released The Room in 2003, he thought he was making a Tennessee Williams-level masterpiece of American drama. Instead, he made a film where people play catch in tuxedos for no reason, subplots about breast cancer disappear in thirty seconds, and the protagonist screams at the sky because his girlfriend is "tearing him apart." It’s a disaster. But it’s a beloved disaster. So, when news broke years ago that James Franco would be directing and starring in a movie about the making of The Room, the internet collectively lost its mind.
The result was The Disaster Artist.
Honestly, it’s a bit of a miracle the movie exists at all. James Franco didn't just play a role; he basically transformed into Wiseau, a man whose origins, age, and source of wealth remain one of Hollywood's greatest unsolved mysteries. Franco’s obsession with the project wasn't just about making a comedy. He saw something poetic in the failure. He saw a guy who wanted to be an artist so badly that he spent $6 million of his own money to fail on a global scale.
Why James Franco Was Obsessed With The Room
If you’ve ever watched The Room, you know it feels like it was written by an alien who had "human emotion" explained to them once but didn't quite get the hang of it. James Franco read Greg Sestero’s book, The Disaster Artist, and realized there was a real human story behind the "Oh hi, Mark" memes.
Franco has always been a weird guy in the industry. He jumps from soap operas to Oscar-nominated dramas to teaching poetry at NYU. He’s restless. He saw in Tommy Wiseau a kindred spirit, albeit a much less technically skilled one. During the filming of The Disaster Artist, Franco stayed in character as Tommy the entire time. Imagine being Seth Rogen or Dave Franco and having to take direction from a guy wearing three belts and a long black wig, speaking in an unidentifiable European accent for twelve hours a day.
It wasn't just a gimmick. Franco was chasing a very specific kind of authenticity. He wanted to capture the "lightning in a bottle" energy of a set where nobody knew what they were doing. To do that, he had to recreate scenes from The Room with terrifying precision. If you watch the side-by-side comparisons, the framing, the lighting, and the awkward pauses are identical. It’s uncanny. It’s almost uncomfortable.
📖 Related: Alfonso Cuarón: Why the Harry Potter 3 Director Changed the Wizarding World Forever
Recreating the Magic of a Trainwreck
How do you make a good movie about a bad movie? You don't mock it. That’s the secret. If Franco had just spent two hours laughing at Tommy Wiseau, the movie would have felt mean-spirited. Instead, he treated the production of The Room like a high-stakes thriller.
The cast he assembled was a "who's who" of 2010s comedy. Dave Franco played Greg Sestero. Seth Rogen played Sandy Schklair, the script supervisor who was basically the only person on the original set trying to make things make sense. But the heart of the film is the relationship between the two leads. It’s a story about friendship and the delusion required to make it in Hollywood.
- The set was built to look exactly like the original.
- The crew used the same bizarre "dual camera" rig Wiseau insisted on—shooting on both 35mm film and HD digital simultaneously for no logical reason.
- Franco spent hours in the makeup chair to get the prosthetic eyelid and the specific weathered look of Wiseau's face.
Most people don't realize how much work goes into looking that cheap. To make a movie look as bad as The Room, you actually need a very talented cinematographer. Brandon Trost, the DP on The Disaster Artist, had to find a way to make high-end equipment look like a low-budget mess without losing the cinematic quality of the "real world" scenes. It’s a delicate balance.
The Complicated Legacy of the Performance
When The Disaster Artist premiered, the reception was overwhelmingly positive. Franco won a Golden Globe. Critics praised him for finding the soul inside the caricature. But then, the real world intervened. Shortly after his win, allegations of sexual misconduct surfaced, which significantly clouded the film's awards season run and Franco's public standing.
This creates a weird tension when we look back at the project today. Can we separate the art from the artist? In this case, it’s even more layered because the art is about another artist who is also deeply eccentric and controversial. Tommy Wiseau himself has a murky history, and while he initially embraced Franco’s portrayal, the relationship between the two was always "it's complicated."
👉 See also: Why the Cast of Hold Your Breath 2024 Makes This Dust Bowl Horror Actually Work
Wiseau attended the Golden Globes with Franco, nearly grabbing the microphone during the acceptance speech. It was a meta-moment that felt like it belonged in The Room itself. One man who failed his way to fame finally standing on a stage he was never supposed to reach, while the man who portrayed him reached a career-high right before a public fall.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Original Film
You can't talk about Franco's version without understanding the source material. A lot of people think The Room is just a "so bad it's good" movie. It’s more than that. It’s a singular vision. Most bad movies are boring. They are made by committees to sell tickets. The Room was made by one man with a dream and a lot of unexplained cash.
There is a sincerity in Wiseau’s work that you can’t fake. James Franco understood that. If you try to write a "bad" movie, you’ll fail. You have to try to make a "great" movie and fail sincerely. That is what Franco captured. He didn't play Tommy as a clown; he played him as a hero who was simply living in a different reality than the rest of us.
The movie explores the specific madness of the Los Angeles acting scene. The endless rejections. The tiny apartments. The "look" people give you when you tell them you’re going to be a star. Franco and his brother Dave used their own experiences as young actors in Hollywood to fuel those scenes. It’s why the movie feels grounded despite the prosthetic faces and weird accents.
Practical Takeaways for Fans of Cult Cinema
If you’re looking to dive deeper into this rabbit hole, there are a few things you should do to truly appreciate the layers of what James Franco did.
✨ Don't miss: Is Steven Weber Leaving Chicago Med? What Really Happened With Dean Archer
First, you have to watch the original The Room with a crowd. It’s a communal experience. You throw plastic spoons at the screen. You yell "Meanwhile, in San Francisco!" during the transition shots. Without that context, The Disaster Artist is just a weird biopic. With it, it’s a victory lap for a film that refused to die.
Second, read Greg Sestero’s book. It’s actually better than the movie. It’s darker, stranger, and provides way more detail about where Tommy might have come from (likely Poland or Romania, though he claims to be from New Orleans). The book highlights the power dynamics and the almost cult-like atmosphere Tommy created on set.
Third, look at the technical side. Pay attention to the "movie within a movie" scenes in Franco's film. They actually hired some of the original crew and actors for cameos. It’s a love letter to the process of creation, no matter how botched that process might be.
The story of James Franco and The Room is a reminder that in the world of entertainment, being memorable is often more important than being good. Tommy Wiseau is a household name because he did something unique. Franco recognized that uniqueness and gave it the prestige treatment, forever linking their legacies in Hollywood history.
To truly understand the impact, start by comparing the "rooftop scene" in both films. Notice how Franco mimics the specific cadence of Wiseau’s "I did not hit her, I did not... oh hi, Mark." It’s a masterclass in mimicry that reveals just how much effort it takes to recreate accidental genius. Study the lighting—the original was shot on a parking lot with a green screen for no reason, and Franco’s team spent thousands of dollars to recreate that specific, flat, ugly look. That's true dedication to the craft of failure.