Words change. They warp. They get dragged through the mud of politics and social media until the original meaning is basically unrecognizable. Honestly, if you ask ten people on the street what is the definition of radical, you're gonna get ten different answers, mostly involving guys in balaclavas or maybe a 90s skateboarder yelling about a "radical" kickflip.
It’s messy.
✨ Don't miss: El clima en Nueva Jersey: Por qué es más loco de lo que te cuentan
But at its heart, the word isn't actually about being extreme or violent. It’s about dirt. Specifically, the roots of a plant. The word comes from the Latin radix, meaning "root." To be radical is to go to the very bottom of a problem rather than just hacking away at the leaves.
The History of What Is the Definition of Radical
Back in the 18th century, if you called yourself a radical, you weren't trying to blow anything up. You were probably a "Radical Reformer" in Britain. Thinkers like John Cartwright weren't interested in just tweaking a few laws; they wanted to pull the entire electoral system out by the roots and replant it. They wanted "universal suffrage"—which was a wild, terrifying idea at the time.
That’s the thing about the definition of radical. It’s totally relative.
What's radical today is tomorrow’s boring status quo. In the 1800s, suggesting that women should vote was a radical position. It was "extreme" because it challenged the very foundation of how society was built. Today, if you argue against women voting, that would be considered a radical (and regressive) departure from the norm. It's a sliding scale.
We see this in math, too. You remember the radical symbol from high school? The $\sqrt{x}$? That’s not just a fancy checkmark. It’s asking you to find the number that, when multiplied by itself, gives you the result. It’s asking for the root. Even in the most rigid of sciences, the word stays true to its origin. It’s the base. The fundamental. The starting point.
Why We Conflate Radicalism with Extremism
People use "radical" and "extremist" like they’re synonyms. They aren't.
Extremism is usually about the methods or the distance from the center. It’s about being on the outer edges of a spectrum. Radicalism, however, is about the depth of the change being proposed. You can be a radical pacifist. That’s a real thing. It means you don’t just want to stop one specific war; you want to dig up the root causes of human conflict—poverty, tribalism, resource scarcity—and fix those so war can't grow there in the first place.
Kinda different from what you see on the news, right?
The problem is that "radical" sounds scary. It implies that the current system is so broken it can’t be fixed with a fresh coat of paint. It suggests we need to tear the house down to the studs because the foundation is cracked. Most people like their houses. Even if the roof leaks a bit, they’d rather put a bucket under the drip than move out. So, "radical" becomes a slur. It’s used to dismiss ideas that feel too big or too fast.
The Medical Perspective
Check this out: in medicine, a "radical" procedure is something like a radical mastectomy or a radical prostatectomy. Doctors aren't being "extreme" for the sake of it. They are removing the entire affected area, including the blood supply and lymph nodes.
They are going to the root.
If a surgeon says they need to take a radical approach, they mean the disease has spread so deep that a surface-level "conservative" treatment won't cut it. It’s a life-or-death distinction. In this context, being radical is actually the most logical, albeit intense, way to save a patient.
The Chemistry of It All
Science loves this word. In chemistry, you’ve got "free radicals." These are atoms or molecules that have an unpaired electron. They’re unstable. They’re highly reactive. They go around bumping into other molecules, trying to steal an electron to become stable again.
This causes a chain reaction.
This is a perfect metaphor for social radicalism. One "unstable" idea hits the status quo. It forces a reaction. That reaction causes another one. Before you know it, the entire molecular structure of a society has shifted. It’s why we take antioxidants—to stop free radicals from damaging our cells. Society does the same thing. It creates "social antioxidants"—laws, traditions, taboos—to prevent radical ideas from causing too much "oxidative stress" to the body politic.
The Semantic Shift: From Roots to "Totally Tubular"
We can't talk about the definition of radical without mentioning the 1980s.
Surfer culture hijacked the word. For a solid decade, "radical" just meant "cool" or "impressive." If you caught a massive wave, it was radical. It’s funny because, in a way, it still fits the root definition. A "radical" move on a surfboard is one that pushes the limits of the sport's fundamental physics.
But mostly, it just sounded catchy.
Then the 90s happened, and the word got even more diluted. It became a marketing term for "X-treme" soda and baggy jeans. We lost the "root" meaning in a sea of neon colors and Saturday morning cartoons. Now, in the 2020s, we’ve swung back the other way. The word is heavy again. It’s political. It’s loaded with baggage from the "War on Terror" and the rise of polarized internet echo chambers.
Angela Davis and the Power of the Root
The activist and scholar Angela Davis famously said: "Radical simply means 'grasping things at the root'." She hit the nail on the head.
When Davis talks about radicalism, she’s talking about looking at systemic issues like racism or incarceration and asking: "Where did this start?" If you believe a system is fundamentally flawed at its inception, then "reform" is just a Band-Aid on a gunshot wound. To a radical, you have to address the "why" before you can fix the "how."
This is where people get uncomfortable.
Looking at the root requires us to admit that some of our most cherished institutions might be built on shaky ground. It’s much easier to just argue about the symptoms. We argue about the "leaves"—policy tweaks, tax rates, rhetoric—because looking at the "root" is exhausting and, honestly, a little bit terrifying.
✨ Don't miss: Long layers for long hair: Why your stylist keeps getting it wrong
Practical Ways to Be "Radical" in Daily Life
You don't have to be a revolutionary to use the definition of radical in your own life. Radical thinking is actually a superpower if you use it right. It’s basically just extreme "First Principles" thinking, a concept popularized by people like Elon Musk (though the Greeks were doing it way earlier).
- Radical Honesty. This isn't about being mean. It’s about refusing to lie to yourself about why you’re unhappy or why a project is failing. Stop looking at the surface excuses. What’s the root? Is it fear? Is it laziness? Is it a lack of skill?
- Radical Empathy. Don’t just feel bad for someone. Try to understand the root of their behavior. If someone is acting like a jerk, what’s the underlying cause? Are they scared? In pain? When you address the root of their anger rather than the anger itself, the conflict usually dissolves.
- Radical Simplicity. Our lives are cluttered with "leaves"—apps, subscriptions, obligations. A radical approach to lifestyle involves cutting everything back to the root of what actually brings you value. It’s more than just "decluttering." It’s a fundamental reassessment of what you're doing with your time on Earth.
The Danger of Surface-Level Radicalism
There’s a fake kind of radicalism that’s pretty popular right now. I call it "Aesthetic Radicalism."
It’s when people adopt the look of a radical—the slogans, the clothes, the edgy social media bios—without ever actually doing the work of digging. They want the "extreme" label because it feels exciting, but they aren't actually interested in the roots. They’re just playing with the leaves.
True radicalism is often quiet. It’s studious. It involves a lot of reading and a lot of uncomfortable self-reflection. It’s not a performance. If someone is shouting about being a radical, there’s a decent chance they’re just an extremist looking for a subculture to join.
Reclaiming the Word
So, where does that leave us?
The definition of radical is a tool. Use it to distinguish between people who want to fix symptoms and people who want to fix systems. Neither is inherently "better"—sometimes you just need to fix the leak so the basement doesn't flood. But if the basement floods every time it rains, eventually you’ve gotta look at the foundation.
Don’t be afraid of the word.
When someone calls an idea "radical," ask them: "Do you mean it’s extreme, or do you mean it’s addressing the root cause?" Usually, they won't have an answer. But by asking, you’ve already started the process of digging. You’ve moved past the surface.
Next Steps for Applying Radical Thinking:
- Audit your biggest problem: Pick one thing in your life that isn't working. Write down why. Then ask "Why?" to that answer. Do this five times. By the fifth "Why," you'll usually hit the root.
- Analyze the news: The next time you see a "radical" group mentioned, look past their tactics. What is the fundamental "root" grievance they are claiming to address? You don't have to agree with them to understand what they are aiming at.
- Study the Radicals: Read the primary sources of historical "radicals" like the Suffragettes or the early Labor movement. You’ll find that their arguments were often deeply logical and grounded in the "roots" of human rights, even if they were considered dangerous at the time.
Radicalism is just a commitment to the truth, no matter how deep you have to dig to find it. It's not about being loud. It's about being thorough.