You probably remember sitting in a cramped classroom, staring at a dusty wall map, and being told there are seven continents. It seemed simple. Africa, Antarctica, Asia, Australia, Europe, North America, and South America. Neat. Tidy. Absolute. But if you actually ask a geologist or a tectonic researcher for the definition of a continent, you're going to get a very long, very hesitant sigh.
There is no single, globally agreed-upon rule for what makes a continent.
It's a mess. Honestly, the more you look into it, the more you realize that our global map is based as much on culture and history as it is on actual rocks. We like to think of continents as discrete islands of land floating in a vast ocean, but that’s just not how the Earth is built. If you look at a globe without the political lines, Europe and Asia are one giant landmass. Why are they separate? Because humans decided they were.
The Scientific Struggle to Define a Continent
Scientists usually look at the crust. The Earth's outer shell comes in two main flavors: oceanic and continental. Oceanic crust is thin, dense, and made mostly of basalt. Continental crust is thick, less dense, and full of granite. This is why continents "float" higher on the mantle than the ocean floor does.
But even this doesn't give us a clean definition of a continent.
Take the "Continental Shelf" into account. This is the submerged part of the continent that extends underwater before dropping off into the deep ocean. If we defined continents purely by where the granite ends, the map would look bloated. If we defined them by what’s currently above sea level, the map changes every time a glacier melts or an ice age begins. It’s a moving target.
✨ Don't miss: Williams Sonoma Deer Park IL: What Most People Get Wrong About This Kitchen Icon
Geology tells us one thing; geography tells us another.
Most geologists use a set of four criteria to identify a continent, though even these are debated. First, you need high elevation relative to the ocean floor. Second, you need a variety of igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. Third, the crust must be thicker than the surrounding oceanic crust. Fourth, there should be well-defined limits.
The Seven-Continent Model is Just One Opinion
Depending on where you went to school, you might have learned a completely different map. In many Spanish-speaking countries and parts of Europe, students are taught a six-continent model where North and South America are just one "America." In Russia and parts of Eastern Europe, the definition of a continent often merges Europe and Asia into a single entity called Eurasia.
Then there’s the Olympic rings. Five rings. Why? Because they represent the five "inhabited" continents, excluding Antarctica.
It feels arbitrary because it is. If we go strictly by "landmasses surrounded by water," then Africa, Europe, and Asia are one single, massive "Eurafrasia" because they are all connected (or were, before the Suez Canal was dug). If we use tectonic plates as the guide, the map gets even weirder. The North American Plate actually carries a chunk of Eastern Russia (Siberia) and part of Japan. Is Tokyo in North America? Geologically, part of it is.
🔗 Read more: Finding the most affordable way to live when everything feels too expensive
The Case of Zealandia: The "New" Continent
A few years ago, a team of geoscientists led by Nick Mortimer published a paper that shook up the textbook industry. They argued for the recognition of Zealandia.
Zealandia is a massive piece of continental crust—about 4.9 million square kilometers—that is 94% underwater. Only New Zealand and New Caledonia poke above the waves. Under the traditional "it must be a big dry landmass" definition of a continent, Zealandia doesn't count. But Mortimer and his team argued that because it is made of thick continental crust and is physically isolated from Australia by oceanic crust, it deserves the title.
It’s the world’s most "sunken" continent.
This discovery highlights the biggest problem with our definitions: we are biased toward what we can see. We focus on the "above water" parts because that's where we live. But the Earth doesn't care about sea level. Sea level is temporary. Tectonics are permanent (on a million-year scale, anyway).
Why the Definition Matters for the Future
You might think this is all just semantics. Who cares if we call it a continent or a subcontinent or a "large igneous province"?
💡 You might also like: Executive desk with drawers: Why your home office setup is probably failing you
It matters for international law. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) uses the concept of the "continental shelf" to determine which countries own the rights to resources like oil, gas, and minerals on the seabed. If a country can prove their land is part of a specific continental structure, they can claim territory far beyond their coastline.
There's also the biological aspect. Continents act as giant "evolutionary islands." When a landmass breaks off—like Madagascar did from Africa—it carries a toolkit of life that evolves in total isolation.
Actionable Insights for Navigating Geography
If you’re trying to understand the world through a more accurate lens than a 5th-grade textbook, keep these points in mind:
- Look at Tectonic Maps: Instead of political maps, find a map of the Earth's tectonic plates. It will show you the real "seams" of the planet.
- Acknowledge the "Eurasia" Reality: Recognize that Europe is a cultural continent, not a geographical one. It’s a peninsula of Asia. Calling it a continent is a nod to history and politics, not geology.
- Follow the Crust: If you're arguing about whether a place like Greenland or Madagascar should be a continent, look at the rock type. If it's thick granite, it's continental. If it's thin basalt, it's oceanic.
- Stay Flexible: Accept that the number of continents is a "best guess" based on current conventions. Whether it's five, six, seven, or eight depends entirely on your criteria.
The Earth is a dynamic, shifting puzzle. Trying to pin down a rigid definition of a continent is like trying to draw a line in a river. It’s better to view continents as "very large, distinct crustal fragments" rather than fixed, unchangeable truths.
Next time someone tells you there are definitely seven continents, you can tell them about Zealandia, the granite crust, and the fact that we’re basically just living on the high spots of a very bumpy, very wet rock.