It started with a secret execution in a Saudi Arabian car park. In 1977, a young princess and her lover were put to death for adultery. Most of the world wouldn't have known about it if it weren't for a documentary-drama that shook the very foundations of international diplomacy. When the Death of a Princess movie finally aired on Britain’s ITV in April 1980, it didn't just cause a stir. It sparked a full-blown geopolitical crisis that almost cost billions in trade and changed how we look at "docudrama" forever.
Honestly, the fallout was insane.
The Saudi government was furious. They saw the film as a direct insult to their legal system, their religion, and the honor of the House of Saud. This wasn't just a bad review. This was a "kick the British Ambassador out of the country" kind of anger. British officials were terrified. At the time, the UK was deep in recession and desperately needed Saudi oil and defense contracts. You’ve got to imagine the panic in London when the Saudis threatened to freeze trade over a TV show.
What Really Happened to Princess Misha'al?
The story at the heart of the Death of a Princess movie is as tragic as it is controversial. Princess Misha'al bint Fahd al-Saud was the 19-year-old grand-niece of King Khalid. She had been sent to Lebanon to study, where she fell in love with Khaled al-Sha'er, the son of a diplomat. Because she was already married into another branch of the royal family, the relationship was considered a capital offense.
They tried to flee. Misha'al reportedly faked her own drowning and tried to slip out of Saudi Arabia dressed as a man, but she was caught at Jeddah airport. On July 15, 1977, both were executed. This wasn't a formal trial in the way Westerners think of them; it was a tribal and familial decision meant to "cleanse" the family's honor.
Antony Thomas, the filmmaker behind the project, heard about this while in the Middle East and became obsessed. He couldn't just film a documentary because no one would talk on camera. Instead, he created a hybrid. He used actors to recreate interviews he had conducted with real people, changing their names to protect them. This "dramatized documentary" style is common now, but in 1980, it felt like a dangerous blur between fact and fiction.
💡 You might also like: Why This Is How We Roll FGL Is Still The Song That Defines Modern Country
The Diplomatic Firestorm of 1980
When word got out that the Death of a Princess movie was going to air, the Saudi's didn't just send a polite letter. They launched a massive campaign to stop it. They pressured the British Foreign Office. They lobbied the US State Department when PBS announced it would air the film on World.
Mobil Oil even took out full-page ads in American newspapers. Think about that for a second. A massive oil corporation was buying ad space to tell people not to watch a movie because it might hurt their business interests in the Gulf.
The British government was stuck between a rock and a hard place. Lord Carrington, the Foreign Secretary at the time, called the film "offensive," but he also knew he couldn't legally stop the broadcast because of the UK’s commitment to a free press. When the film aired, the Saudi government retaliated by expelling the British Ambassador, James Craig. They also imposed a temporary ban on visas for British businessmen.
It was a mess.
Why the film was so polarizing
The Death of a Princess movie isn't just about an execution. It’s actually a movie about a man trying to find the truth and failing. The protagonist is a journalist (based on Thomas) who travels around the Middle East, talking to people who give him conflicting stories. Some see the Princess as a feminist martyr. Others see her as a spoiled girl who broke the law.
📖 Related: The Real Story Behind I Can Do Bad All by Myself: From Stage to Screen
This nuance is what made the Saudi government so mad. The film suggested that the Saudi elite lived double lives—drinking and partying in Europe while enforcing strict religious laws at home. It exposed a hypocrisy that the Kingdom was not ready to have broadcast to millions of viewers in London and New York.
- The film showed women in veils watching Western films.
- It depicted the "man-hunting" culture of wealthy Saudi women in boutiques.
- It questioned whether the execution was even legal under Sharia law or just a tribal execution.
The Legacy of the Death of a Princess Movie
You might wonder why we still care about a grainy 1980 TV movie. Well, it set the template for how Western media covers the Middle East. It also showed the power of "soft power" and media. One film did more damage to Saudi-British relations than years of political disagreements ever could.
Interestingly, the film was largely "buried" for years. Because of the diplomatic pressure, it wasn't rebroadcast for a long time. It became a bit of a legend—the movie that was too dangerous to watch. Today, you can find it online, and while the production values look a bit dated, the tension is still there. You can feel the weight of the secrets being told.
There's also the question of accuracy. Antony Thomas has always maintained that his "interviews" were based on real conversations. However, critics at the time, and since, have argued that the film relies too heavily on Orientalist tropes. They say it frames the Middle East as a place of "barbaric" mystery rather than a complex society. Whether you agree or not, the film forced a conversation about cultural relativism that we are still having today.
Navigating the History of the Film
If you're interested in the Death of a Princess movie, you shouldn't just watch it as a historical artifact. You have to look at it as a piece of political history.
👉 See also: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa
- Check the sources: Read the memoirs of Sir James Craig, the ambassador who was expelled. He gives a fascinating account of what it was like to be at the center of the storm.
- Look at the PBS controversy: The American experience was different. Despite pressure from the White House, most PBS stations aired the film, arguing that the public had a right to see it. It remains one of the highest-rated programs in PBS history.
- Analyze the "Docudrama" format: This movie is a case study for film students. It challenges the idea that a documentary has to be "objective."
The Death of a Princess movie reminds us that images have consequences. In 1980, a single broadcast threatened the oil supply of the Western world. It showed that stories about honor, love, and death can be more powerful than diplomats and trade deals.
The best way to understand the impact of this film is to look at the immediate reactions from the era. Search for the archived New York Times articles from May 1980 or the transcripts of the UK Parliament debates. You’ll see a world that was terrified of the power of a single TV screen.
To get the full picture, look for the book Death of a Princess: The Trial by Thomas, which delves deeper into his research process. Understanding the context of the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which happened just before the film aired, is also vital. The Saudi monarchy was already feeling incredibly vulnerable to "Western corruption," which is why their reaction to the film was so explosive.
Watch the film through the lens of 1980s geopolitics. Compare the "interviews" depicted in the movie with actual historical accounts of the Saudi judicial system from that time. Finally, research the career of Antony Thomas; his later work often returned to themes of hidden lives and systemic injustice, proving that this movie wasn't just a one-off provocation, but a career-long commitment to uncomfortable truths.